RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    독일 문화정책의 이상적 기대와 실제 현실에 대한 개관 = An Overview of an Ideal Expectation and Actual Reality of German Cultural Policy

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Up until the 1970s, Germany's cultural policy stood primarily for "cultural care": for example, the entertainment of theaters, museums or opera houses. With the "New Cultural Policy", participation became the focus. Leading goals such as "cultural democracy", "civil rights culture" and "culture for all" rely on the participation of all citizens. Cultural policy as social policy had to get rid of the elitist - an expanded concept of culture no longer only to stand for literature and art, but also for lifestyles, values ​​and beliefs. At local and state level, cultural policy is mostly a distribution policy. No urban stage in the Federal Republic could hold its own on the "market". Accordingly, more culture means more costs. At the same time, art thrives on the ideal of being able to develop free of interests.
    In addition to visitor orientation, the demand today includes, among other things, a new organizational culture for public cultural companies, the consideration of the actors as "knowledge employees", the development of multidimensional cultural financing or the formation of creative alliances. That is all correct and necessary, but it also remains to be warned against pushing too hard an adaptation of market action, too harshly throwing overboard the principles of a cultural area that is also cumbersome and mortgage-laden. Cultural management and cultural policy remain related, a relationship that has to be balanced again and again.
    The scarcity of public funds also leads to concrete problems of cultural funding: the majority of the funds are tied up for institutions such as municipal museums; these often have too tight administrative budgets and lose innovative strength and scientific value; More and more third-party funders such as foundations, but now also the federal government, are increasingly raising expectations regarding the content of local cultural businesses, which are forcing them into a conflict between legal entities and funding backdrop.
    번역하기

    Up until the 1970s, Germany's cultural policy stood primarily for "cultural care": for example, the entertainment of theaters, museums or opera houses. With the "New Cultural Policy", participation became the focus. Leading goals such as "cultural dem...

    Up until the 1970s, Germany's cultural policy stood primarily for "cultural care": for example, the entertainment of theaters, museums or opera houses. With the "New Cultural Policy", participation became the focus. Leading goals such as "cultural democracy", "civil rights culture" and "culture for all" rely on the participation of all citizens. Cultural policy as social policy had to get rid of the elitist - an expanded concept of culture no longer only to stand for literature and art, but also for lifestyles, values ​​and beliefs. At local and state level, cultural policy is mostly a distribution policy. No urban stage in the Federal Republic could hold its own on the "market". Accordingly, more culture means more costs. At the same time, art thrives on the ideal of being able to develop free of interests.
    In addition to visitor orientation, the demand today includes, among other things, a new organizational culture for public cultural companies, the consideration of the actors as "knowledge employees", the development of multidimensional cultural financing or the formation of creative alliances. That is all correct and necessary, but it also remains to be warned against pushing too hard an adaptation of market action, too harshly throwing overboard the principles of a cultural area that is also cumbersome and mortgage-laden. Cultural management and cultural policy remain related, a relationship that has to be balanced again and again.
    The scarcity of public funds also leads to concrete problems of cultural funding: the majority of the funds are tied up for institutions such as municipal museums; these often have too tight administrative budgets and lose innovative strength and scientific value; More and more third-party funders such as foundations, but now also the federal government, are increasingly raising expectations regarding the content of local cultural businesses, which are forcing them into a conflict between legal entities and funding backdrop.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 윤미애, "현대도시의 지형학과 벤야민의 도시읽기 - 발터 벤야민의 『파사주 프로젝트』에 대한 소론" 한국독일어문학회 19 (19): 153-175, 2011

    2 최미세, "문화예술의 공적가치와 문화민주주의" 한국독일어문학회 22 (22): 395-416, 2014

    3 배정희, "문화연구로서의 지역학- 함부르크의 문화지역학적 특징으로서의 도시와 항구, 다리의 관계에 대한 고찰" 한국독일어문학회 19 (19): 127-149, 2011

    4 조우호, "독일의 문화정책에 기초된 문화이념과 문화주의의 성격" 한국독어독문학교육학회 69 (69): 159-182, 2017

    5 김상원, "독일 에센의 통합적 도시재생과 문화마케팅 - LED 조명을 중심으로" 한국독어독문학교육학회 67 (67): 229-246, 2016

    6 윤태원, "독일 문화정책의 역사적 고찰" 한국독일언어문학회 (78) : 157-186, 2017

    7 김화임, "노르트라인-베스트팔렌 주정부의 상호문화성 정책과 그 실제" 한국독어독문학교육학회 56 (56): 399-422, 2013

    8 Die aktuelle Denkschrift des Rates für Kulturelle Bildung e.V., "Zur Sache. Kulturelle Bildung: Gegenstände, Praktiken und Felder"

    9 Elias, Norbert, "Studien über die Deutschen. Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert"

    10 Brinkmann, Dieter, "Pädagogik selbstorganisierter Bürgerhäuser, Bielefeld. Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. Übereinkommen über den Schutz und die Förderung der Vielfalt kultureller Ausdrucksformen"

    1 윤미애, "현대도시의 지형학과 벤야민의 도시읽기 - 발터 벤야민의 『파사주 프로젝트』에 대한 소론" 한국독일어문학회 19 (19): 153-175, 2011

    2 최미세, "문화예술의 공적가치와 문화민주주의" 한국독일어문학회 22 (22): 395-416, 2014

    3 배정희, "문화연구로서의 지역학- 함부르크의 문화지역학적 특징으로서의 도시와 항구, 다리의 관계에 대한 고찰" 한국독일어문학회 19 (19): 127-149, 2011

    4 조우호, "독일의 문화정책에 기초된 문화이념과 문화주의의 성격" 한국독어독문학교육학회 69 (69): 159-182, 2017

    5 김상원, "독일 에센의 통합적 도시재생과 문화마케팅 - LED 조명을 중심으로" 한국독어독문학교육학회 67 (67): 229-246, 2016

    6 윤태원, "독일 문화정책의 역사적 고찰" 한국독일언어문학회 (78) : 157-186, 2017

    7 김화임, "노르트라인-베스트팔렌 주정부의 상호문화성 정책과 그 실제" 한국독어독문학교육학회 56 (56): 399-422, 2013

    8 Die aktuelle Denkschrift des Rates für Kulturelle Bildung e.V., "Zur Sache. Kulturelle Bildung: Gegenstände, Praktiken und Felder"

    9 Elias, Norbert, "Studien über die Deutschen. Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert"

    10 Brinkmann, Dieter, "Pädagogik selbstorganisierter Bürgerhäuser, Bielefeld. Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. Übereinkommen über den Schutz und die Förderung der Vielfalt kultureller Ausdrucksformen"

    11 Deutscher Bundestag, "Kultur in Deutschland. Schlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission des Deutschen Bundestages" 2008

    12 "Einigungsvertrag vom 31. August 1990(BGBl. 1990 II p. 889), Art. 35"

    13 Endreß, Alexander, "Die Kulturpolitik des Bundes. Strukturelle und inhaltliche Neuorientierung zur Jahrtausendwende?" 2005

    14 Beck, Ulrich, "Das kosmopolitische Europa. Gesellschaft und Politik in der Zweiten Moderne" 2004

    15 Bollenbeck, Georg, "Bildung und Kultur. Glanz und Elend eines deutschen Deutungsmusters" 1996

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-04-22 학회명변경 영문명 : FOREIGN STUDIES CENTER -> FOREIGN STUDIES INSTITUTE KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2007-09-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 외국어문학연구소 -> 외국학연구소
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.28 0.28 0.25
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.22 0.2 0.437 0.12
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼