中央政府와 地方政府間 事務分配의 改善方案 = Improvemental measures of functional allocation between the central and local government

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study analyzes the relationship between the central and local government, with a specific focus on the allocation of functions performed by the two different levels of government. It is assumed that this study has a significant contribution to our understanding of the role of government in general and of the many functions performed by the two authorities in particular. Moreover, there is an increasing need to clarify the relationship as we are facing a new system of local autonomy in the very near future.
In this study, the subject is dealt with in six chapters. In each of them there are some important theoretical and methodological discussions that may deserve to be fully described here. However, it is necessary to note here that the following analysis and explanations have the most significance.
we have generalized the relationship between the central and local government by introducing several theoretical and practical perspectives. To cite a few, there is J. A. G. Griffith who presents three models of the governmental relationship :Laisser-faire Type, Regulatory Type, and Promotional Type. Howard Elcock has Partnership Model and Agent Model. Deil S. Wright clarifies among Coordinate-Authority Model, Overlapping-Authority Model, and Inclusive-Authority Model. Finally, H. F. Alderfer divides into only two different types :Dependent and Regulatory Models.
The several comparative analyses about the functional divisions of governmental activities in a few countries, including Great Britain, United States, France, and Japan. They represent different types of administrative relations and show several important characteristics in managing their own governments. For instance, Japan has, contrary to our general understanding, a relatively weak command system from the central to local government, and there is a wide discussion about the level of cooperation between the two.
The bulk of this study focuses on the case of Korea. Here, we can find a few important characteristics seen in the administrative relations between the central and local government. First of all, the functional divisions of governmental activities in Korea are very ambiguous and the delegated activities from the central to local government is somewhat over-loaded. This gives a sign of the meticulous control, supervision, and direction to the local government from the strong central government.
All in all, it means that there are not so much divisions of administrative power between the central and local government.
A final note may clear the limitation of this study. Although this dissertation tries to focus on the functional allocation of administration between the central and local government, it should be stated here that a comprehensive analysis on the every aspect of governmental relations was very difficult. Since the governmental activities are by themselves interrelated with both inter-cabinet level and inter-governmental level, there remains some difficulties in analyzing the proper relations in every field of governmental activities.
Besides, there are many factors such as the financial and personnel limitations that can give a significant influence in implementing administrative decisions. No grand theories or models of administrative division of functions would be possible, yet the above analyses seem to have a significant relevance to the relations between central and local government in Korea.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 3
• 제2장 중앙과 지방정부간의 상호관계에 관한 이론검토 = 4
• 제1절 정부간 관계에 관한 이론 모형 = 4
• 1. Ernest S. Griffith = 4
• 2. Howard Elcock = 5
• 3. Deil S. Wright = 8
• 제2절 중앙과 지방정부의 기능 구분 = 12
• 1. 정부기능의 유형 = 12
• 2. 지방정부의 역할 구분 = 15
• 제3절 지방정부의 분권 유형 = 18
• 제3장 외국의 정부간 사무배분 제도 = 23
• 제1절 각국의 사무배분 제도 = 23
• 1. 영국의 사무배분 제도 = 24
• 2. 미국의 사무배분 제도 = 28
• 3. 프랑스의 사무배분제도 = 29
• 4. 일본의 사무배분 제도 = 34
• 제2절 각국 사무배분의 원칙 = 44
• 제3절 외국 사무배분 제도의 정책적 시사점 = 46
• 제4장 우리나라 사무배분의 실태 및 문제점 = 51
• 제1절 사무배분의 원칙과 기준 = 51
• 1. 사무배분의 원칙 = 51
• 2. 사무배분의 기준 = 52
• 제1절 사무배분의 실태 = 57
• 1. 중앙정부와 지방정부간 사무의 성질별 배분 = 57
• 2. 중앙정부와 지방정부간 사무의 기능별 배분 = 59
• 3. 중앙정부와 지방정부간 사무의 부처별 배분 = 60
• 4. 중앙정부와 지 방정부간 사무의 조사기관별 배분 = 61
• 5. 중앙정부와 지방정부간 사무처리의 주체별 배분 = 61
• 제3절 사무배분의 문제점 = 63
• 1. 명확한 사무구분의 부재 = 64
• 2. 국가위임사무의 비중 과다 = 66
• 3. 위임사무에 대한 경비부담 문제 = 67
• 4. 자치적 기능수행의 제약 = 67
• 5. 국회와 지방의회의 관여범위 불분명 = 69
• 6. 특별행정기관의 설치와 중복적인 사무배분 = 70
• 제5장 사무배분의 개선방안 = 71
• 제1절 사무배분의 전제 : 미래 행정관경의 변화 = 71
• 1. 행정수요의 다양화 = 71
• 2. 행정의 민주화 요구 = 71
• 3. 지방자치단체의 자율성 범위의 확대 = 72
• 제2절 사무배분의 개선방안 = 73
• 1. 사무구분의 명확화 = 73
• 2. 국가 위임사무의 감소 = 77
• 3. 위임사무에 소요되는 경비문제의 해결 = 77
• 4. 자치적 기능수행을 제고하는 방안 = 78
• 5. 국회와 지방의회의 관여 범위 명확화 = 79
• 6. 특별행정기관의 설치 억제 = 80
• 제6장 결론 = 81
• 참고문헌 = 83
• SUMMARY = 88