RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    직접민주주의규정의 헌법개정에 대한 검토

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76468662

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      About 60 years ago, we, koreans, started democracy but our political condition is not up to our first ideal. That means dictatorship or quasi-democracy. in this reason, I decided to study Direct-Democracy to be a little help to korean democracy" development.<BR>  Lately, in korea, revision of the constitution is be under debate. So I came to write this these to make Direct-Democracy proposal.<BR>  IN korean constitutional law, Article Ⅰ, clause 1 has it that Korea is democratic republic, and Article Ⅰ, clause 2 has it that Sovereignty rests with the people. However the real situation is different. I think that it is our urgent need to replace formal Sovereignty with substantial Sovereignty. To realize substantial Sovereignty, We need Direct-Democracy which will, I believe, satisfy our real political demand. The reason why the principle of Sovereignty became formal, I think mainly, is that we have no effective way to take part in political decision. Namely although citizens want to participate in political decision, they can do so only in election and an opinion poll etc, not through direct Democracy. only through these rare chance, citizens cannot become ideal citizens. So ultimately Democracy cannot be completed. In this reason, direct Democracy is essential in completing Democracy.<BR>  Existing thearies treat principle of Sovereignty, and representative system and direct Democracy separately, but principle of Sovereignty is closely connected with representative system and direct Democracy because whether principle of Sovereignty is formal or active, functional and substantial, can be defined by how much representative system and direct Democracy are partitioned.<BR>  My assertion is that semi-directory system is the best political system because representative system and direct Democracy are not perfect itself.<BR>  Specially, in this thesis, I treat direct Democracy not because direct Democracy can replace representative system, but because direct Democracy can make up for the defect of representative system.<BR>  The main reason why direct Democracy can not be practiced is not only ideological, hegemonic problem but also we have no efficient way to practice direct Democracy. In this point, To practice direct Democracy. is most needed Specially E-Democracy provides e-vote and space for debate on which direct Democracy is based. In addition, mature people will to take part in political decision, makes direct Democracy practicable. Through all changes, we can challenge bloodless revolution and achieve the purpose of substantial Democracy.
    번역하기

      About 60 years ago, we, koreans, started democracy but our political condition is not up to our first ideal. That means dictatorship or quasi-democracy. in this reason, I decided to study Direct-Democracy to be a little help to korean demo...

      About 60 years ago, we, koreans, started democracy but our political condition is not up to our first ideal. That means dictatorship or quasi-democracy. in this reason, I decided to study Direct-Democracy to be a little help to korean democracy" development.<BR>  Lately, in korea, revision of the constitution is be under debate. So I came to write this these to make Direct-Democracy proposal.<BR>  IN korean constitutional law, Article Ⅰ, clause 1 has it that Korea is democratic republic, and Article Ⅰ, clause 2 has it that Sovereignty rests with the people. However the real situation is different. I think that it is our urgent need to replace formal Sovereignty with substantial Sovereignty. To realize substantial Sovereignty, We need Direct-Democracy which will, I believe, satisfy our real political demand. The reason why the principle of Sovereignty became formal, I think mainly, is that we have no effective way to take part in political decision. Namely although citizens want to participate in political decision, they can do so only in election and an opinion poll etc, not through direct Democracy. only through these rare chance, citizens cannot become ideal citizens. So ultimately Democracy cannot be completed. In this reason, direct Democracy is essential in completing Democracy.<BR>  Existing thearies treat principle of Sovereignty, and representative system and direct Democracy separately, but principle of Sovereignty is closely connected with representative system and direct Democracy because whether principle of Sovereignty is formal or active, functional and substantial, can be defined by how much representative system and direct Democracy are partitioned.<BR>  My assertion is that semi-directory system is the best political system because representative system and direct Democracy are not perfect itself.<BR>  Specially, in this thesis, I treat direct Democracy not because direct Democracy can replace representative system, but because direct Democracy can make up for the defect of representative system.<BR>  The main reason why direct Democracy can not be practiced is not only ideological, hegemonic problem but also we have no efficient way to practice direct Democracy. In this point, To practice direct Democracy. is most needed Specially E-Democracy provides e-vote and space for debate on which direct Democracy is based. In addition, mature people will to take part in political decision, makes direct Democracy practicable. Through all changes, we can challenge bloodless revolution and achieve the purpose of substantial Democracy.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼