RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      전기통신사업법 개정안의 문제점과 통신 도매시장 활성화를 위한 법적 과제 = Issues of the Revision Draft to the Telecommunications Business Act & Legal Tasks to Revitalize the Wholesale Telecommunications Market

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99704654

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Ministry of Government Legislation has completed its deliberations on the “partial revision draft to the Electricity and Telecommunications Industry Act”, which makes resale obligatory, and has referred it to the Science, Technology, Information & Telecommunications Committee of the National Assembly. When this draft goes into effect, Korea`s telecommunications market - especially the mobile telecommunications market - will see the emergence of a completely new market participant, the resale businesses. This should boost competition. However, the degree to which competition is promoted will depend on how effectively hindrances to the emergence of this new type of business are resolved. Among other things, there will be complaints of excessive regulation and anti-competitive market policy as well as arguments over profitability, who will bear the initial investment costs, uncertainty about cooperation by resale providers, and so on. Through this revision, the government intends to expedite competition by lowering entry barriers and reduce mobile telecommunications charges for the general public. The draft is meant to create several legal tools to drive this change. The major thrust of the revision is introduction of wholesale regulation and relaxing of retail regulation to improve regulation on telecommunications charges (Addition of Article 33-8 and revision of Articles 29 and 36-3 in the draft). Under the current system, new businesses face high structural barriers to entry such as frequency limits, and in principle, telecommunications businesses determine telecommunications charges on their own and report them to the authorities. Nevertheless, market-controlling businesses(KT`s city call and high-speed Internet service and SK`s mobile calling) require appropriate ministers` approval when setting charges. The revision introduces wholesale regulation to create an environment where a new business without a telecommunications network can advance into the retail market, and thereby provide services at rates different from those of existing businesses. It facilitates competition and induces market entry by various businesses from the industries of distribution, finance, and others. ``Wholesale regulation`` will minimize abuse of market power by a few companies and induce rate competition. The system for reduction of charges, which is ``retail regulation``, is designed to bring about conversion to the reporting system step-by-step. Once the revised resale system firmly takes root, the advancement of new businesses will be much easier, doing much to vitalize competition. Still, there will likely be many hurdles to overcome before the wholesale market becomes active as a result of the revision. This paper will consider the significance and issues of the draft revision from various viewpoints and suggest legal tasks for the vitalization of the telecommunications wholesale market.
      번역하기

      The Ministry of Government Legislation has completed its deliberations on the “partial revision draft to the Electricity and Telecommunications Industry Act”, which makes resale obligatory, and has referred it to the Science, Technology, Informati...

      The Ministry of Government Legislation has completed its deliberations on the “partial revision draft to the Electricity and Telecommunications Industry Act”, which makes resale obligatory, and has referred it to the Science, Technology, Information & Telecommunications Committee of the National Assembly. When this draft goes into effect, Korea`s telecommunications market - especially the mobile telecommunications market - will see the emergence of a completely new market participant, the resale businesses. This should boost competition. However, the degree to which competition is promoted will depend on how effectively hindrances to the emergence of this new type of business are resolved. Among other things, there will be complaints of excessive regulation and anti-competitive market policy as well as arguments over profitability, who will bear the initial investment costs, uncertainty about cooperation by resale providers, and so on. Through this revision, the government intends to expedite competition by lowering entry barriers and reduce mobile telecommunications charges for the general public. The draft is meant to create several legal tools to drive this change. The major thrust of the revision is introduction of wholesale regulation and relaxing of retail regulation to improve regulation on telecommunications charges (Addition of Article 33-8 and revision of Articles 29 and 36-3 in the draft). Under the current system, new businesses face high structural barriers to entry such as frequency limits, and in principle, telecommunications businesses determine telecommunications charges on their own and report them to the authorities. Nevertheless, market-controlling businesses(KT`s city call and high-speed Internet service and SK`s mobile calling) require appropriate ministers` approval when setting charges. The revision introduces wholesale regulation to create an environment where a new business without a telecommunications network can advance into the retail market, and thereby provide services at rates different from those of existing businesses. It facilitates competition and induces market entry by various businesses from the industries of distribution, finance, and others. ``Wholesale regulation`` will minimize abuse of market power by a few companies and induce rate competition. The system for reduction of charges, which is ``retail regulation``, is designed to bring about conversion to the reporting system step-by-step. Once the revised resale system firmly takes root, the advancement of new businesses will be much easier, doing much to vitalize competition. Still, there will likely be many hurdles to overcome before the wholesale market becomes active as a result of the revision. This paper will consider the significance and issues of the draft revision from various viewpoints and suggest legal tasks for the vitalization of the telecommunications wholesale market.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 양용석, "통신 도매시장 활성화를 위한 정책적 제언" 한국정보산업연합회 2008

      2 정보통신부, "전기통신사업법 일부개정법률안" 국회 제출자료 2008

      3 정보통신부, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      4 정보통신부, "국회 보고자료" 2008

      5 법제처, "국회 보고자료" 2008

      6 SKT, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      7 규제개혁위원회, "국회 보고자료" 2008

      8 정보통신산업연합회, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      9 KOTRA EU 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      10 KOTRA 영국 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      1 양용석, "통신 도매시장 활성화를 위한 정책적 제언" 한국정보산업연합회 2008

      2 정보통신부, "전기통신사업법 일부개정법률안" 국회 제출자료 2008

      3 정보통신부, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      4 정보통신부, "국회 보고자료" 2008

      5 법제처, "국회 보고자료" 2008

      6 SKT, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      7 규제개혁위원회, "국회 보고자료" 2008

      8 정보통신산업연합회, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      9 KOTRA EU 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      10 KOTRA 영국 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      11 KOTRA 스웨덴 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      12 KOTRA 덴마크 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      13 KOTRA 아일랜드 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      14 KOTRA 노르웨이 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      15 KOTRA 스페인 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      16 KOTRA 아이슬란드 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      17 KOTRA 미국 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      18 KOTRA 일본 무역관, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      19 KT, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      20 KTF, "국회 보고자료" 2007

      21 국회 과학기술정보통신위원회, "국정감사 결과자료" 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2007-05-09 학회명변경 한글명 : 과학기술법연구소 -> 과학기술법연구원
      영문명 : Institute for Law of science & Technology -> Institute for Law of Science & Technology
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.51 0.51 0.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.48 0.42 0.66 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼