RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Notion of Null Hypothesis in Generative Grammar

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105819558

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper claims that given the exhaustive list of interpretive effects of Merge, as argued in this paper, the formal operation of Merge may be null hypothesis, which leads to new linguistic explanations, crucially supporting non-determinism (Yang 2013, 2014). Chomsky (2008) states: Merge can apply freely, yielding expressions interpreted at the interface in many different kinds of ways. The free Merge theory as claimed by Chomsky (2008) above implies that the Merge operation is free and optional unless the derivation comes to be constrained by some condition like the [+marked] feature, as discussed with respect to non-determinism (Yang 2013, 2014). The free and optional Merge is unmarked unless it is marked by being obligatory due to the [+marked] feature as mentioned above. Chomsky (2008) claims that every Merge, especially the unmarked Merge, always induces an interpretive effect. In fact, we may assume that even the marked Merge, which has been often exceptionally claimed to induce no interpretive effect, can be assumed to induce an interpretive effect called the null interpretive effect, or simply null effect. Hence, we accept Chomsky's claim literally that every Merge induces an interpretive effect, and develop the theory of grammar crucially based on the general notion of interpretive effect of Merge. The overt exact operation of Merge for each interpretive effect is rarely distinctively defined in contrast to the general (semantic and/or functional) notion of interpretive effects like topic, focus, etc., so that the overt operation of Merge itself can be assumed to be null hypothesis, obviously even without involving the edge feature effects (Chomsky 2008), while the essential distinctive effects of Merge should be the semantic or functional interpretive effect itself (Yang 2014). By way of motivating the null hypothesis theory for Merge as characterized above, I will discuss significant theoretical implications of the null hypothesis of Merge with respect to new linguistic explanations, speculating how far the null hypothesis theory is applicable in our grammar.
      번역하기

      This paper claims that given the exhaustive list of interpretive effects of Merge, as argued in this paper, the formal operation of Merge may be null hypothesis, which leads to new linguistic explanations, crucially supporting non-determinism (Yang 20...

      This paper claims that given the exhaustive list of interpretive effects of Merge, as argued in this paper, the formal operation of Merge may be null hypothesis, which leads to new linguistic explanations, crucially supporting non-determinism (Yang 2013, 2014). Chomsky (2008) states: Merge can apply freely, yielding expressions interpreted at the interface in many different kinds of ways. The free Merge theory as claimed by Chomsky (2008) above implies that the Merge operation is free and optional unless the derivation comes to be constrained by some condition like the [+marked] feature, as discussed with respect to non-determinism (Yang 2013, 2014). The free and optional Merge is unmarked unless it is marked by being obligatory due to the [+marked] feature as mentioned above. Chomsky (2008) claims that every Merge, especially the unmarked Merge, always induces an interpretive effect. In fact, we may assume that even the marked Merge, which has been often exceptionally claimed to induce no interpretive effect, can be assumed to induce an interpretive effect called the null interpretive effect, or simply null effect. Hence, we accept Chomsky's claim literally that every Merge induces an interpretive effect, and develop the theory of grammar crucially based on the general notion of interpretive effect of Merge. The overt exact operation of Merge for each interpretive effect is rarely distinctively defined in contrast to the general (semantic and/or functional) notion of interpretive effects like topic, focus, etc., so that the overt operation of Merge itself can be assumed to be null hypothesis, obviously even without involving the edge feature effects (Chomsky 2008), while the essential distinctive effects of Merge should be the semantic or functional interpretive effect itself (Yang 2014). By way of motivating the null hypothesis theory for Merge as characterized above, I will discuss significant theoretical implications of the null hypothesis of Merge with respect to new linguistic explanations, speculating how far the null hypothesis theory is applicable in our grammar.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼