RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      특허지표와 기업 성과의 인과관계에 대한 분석

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82636232

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      As business environment has become more competitive, the R&D strategies of firms have been regarded more important. Patent has information about technology which affects a firm’s profit and it is considered as resources which have provided appropriate data for research of innovations and trends in technology. And patent indicators are known as qualitative representation of technology quality in an objective view. Also, they are available for the continuous and systematic analysis. However, most previous studies have focused on developing patent indicators to investigate patent value and characteristics. Furthermore they have limitations that most results is not significant that patent indicators have effect on firm performance-Tobin’s q, Intangible assets based on balance sheet, sales and etc. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to propose proper a factor to represent a firm performance and to analyze causal relationship between patent indicators and firm performance. Intangible assets based on market value are employed as one of most significant firm performance indicator.
      The results indicate that intangible assets are appropriate for analyzing causal relation between patent and a firm performance with 7 significant indicators among 10 patent indicators. Considering firm’s exogenous factors, regression analysis of each data for five years is performed. This result is similar to regression analysis of full data for all years.
      번역하기

      As business environment has become more competitive, the R&D strategies of firms have been regarded more important. Patent has information about technology which affects a firm’s profit and it is considered as resources which have provided appropria...

      As business environment has become more competitive, the R&D strategies of firms have been regarded more important. Patent has information about technology which affects a firm’s profit and it is considered as resources which have provided appropriate data for research of innovations and trends in technology. And patent indicators are known as qualitative representation of technology quality in an objective view. Also, they are available for the continuous and systematic analysis. However, most previous studies have focused on developing patent indicators to investigate patent value and characteristics. Furthermore they have limitations that most results is not significant that patent indicators have effect on firm performance-Tobin’s q, Intangible assets based on balance sheet, sales and etc. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to propose proper a factor to represent a firm performance and to analyze causal relationship between patent indicators and firm performance. Intangible assets based on market value are employed as one of most significant firm performance indicator.
      The results indicate that intangible assets are appropriate for analyzing causal relation between patent and a firm performance with 7 significant indicators among 10 patent indicators. Considering firm’s exogenous factors, regression analysis of each data for five years is performed. This result is similar to regression analysis of full data for all years.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 문헌 연구
      • 3. 연구가설 및 자료수집
      • 4. 연구 결과
      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 문헌 연구
      • 3. 연구가설 및 자료수집
      • 4. 연구 결과
      • 5. 결론 및 제언
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 US. Department of Commerce,

      2 이기환, "특허활동이 경영성과에 미치 는 영향; 벤처기업 대 일반기업" 79-104, 2006

      3 김혁준, "특허정보를 이용한 기업성과 분석-기술다각화를 중심으로" (102) : 2008

      4 오범석, "특허가치전략-특허경영전략의 관점 에서" 페이퍼하우스 2009

      5 남영준, "인용정보를 이용한 신 특허지수 개발에 관한 연구" 한국정보관리학회 23 (23): 221-241, 2006

      6 김홍기, "연구개발비가 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" (14) : 171-193, 2004

      7 정혜영, "연구개발비 정보의 기업가치 관련성에 관한 연구: 산업별 비교" 한국경영학회 32 (32): 10-282, 2003

      8 서지성, "무형자산성 지출의 회계처리방법에 따른 기업가치관련성" 한국국제회계학회 (24) : 317-336, 2008

      9 손수정, "기초원천기술 경쟁력 강화와 특허정책" 과학기술정책, 과학기술정책연구원, 2009

      10 한국특허정보원, "기술로드맵 작성을 위한 특 허 분석 방법론" 한국특허정보원 2005

      1 US. Department of Commerce,

      2 이기환, "특허활동이 경영성과에 미치 는 영향; 벤처기업 대 일반기업" 79-104, 2006

      3 김혁준, "특허정보를 이용한 기업성과 분석-기술다각화를 중심으로" (102) : 2008

      4 오범석, "특허가치전략-특허경영전략의 관점 에서" 페이퍼하우스 2009

      5 남영준, "인용정보를 이용한 신 특허지수 개발에 관한 연구" 한국정보관리학회 23 (23): 221-241, 2006

      6 김홍기, "연구개발비가 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" (14) : 171-193, 2004

      7 정혜영, "연구개발비 정보의 기업가치 관련성에 관한 연구: 산업별 비교" 한국경영학회 32 (32): 10-282, 2003

      8 서지성, "무형자산성 지출의 회계처리방법에 따른 기업가치관련성" 한국국제회계학회 (24) : 317-336, 2008

      9 손수정, "기초원천기술 경쟁력 강화와 특허정책" 과학기술정책, 과학기술정책연구원, 2009

      10 한국특허정보원, "기술로드맵 작성을 위한 특 허 분석 방법론" 한국특허정보원 2005

      11 United States Patent and Trademark Office, "http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/ documents/0900_901_05.htm#sect901.05"

      12 Reitzig, M., "What determines patent value? :Insights from the semiconductor industry" 32 (32): 13-26, 2003

      13 Hirschey, M, "Valuation effects of patent quality:A comparison for Japanese and U.S. firms" 9 (9): 65-82, 2001

      14 Trajtenberg, M., "University versus corporate patents:A window on the basicness of invention" 5 (5): 19-50, 1997

      15 Soete, L.G, "The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator" 58 (58): 31-54, 1983

      16 Chen, Y, "The relationship between a firm’s patent quality and its market value-The case of US pharmaceutical industry" 77 (77): 20-33, 2010

      17 Sveiby, K.E., "The new organizational wealth :Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets" Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc 1997

      18 Grupp, H., "The measurement of technical performance of innovations by technometrics and its impact on established technology indicators" 23 (23): 175-193, 1994

      19 Blind, K., "The influence of strategic patenting on companie’s patent portfolios" 38 (38): 428-436, 2009

      20 Shane, H, "The Relation Between Patent Citations and Tobin’s q in the Semiconductor Industry" 9 (9): 131-146, 1997

      21 Lerner, J., "The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis" 25 (25): 319-333, 1994

      22 Matolcsy, Z, "The Association between Technological Conditions and the Market Value of Equity" 83 (83): 479-518, 2008

      23 Dengm, Z., "Science and technology as predictors of stock performance" 55 (55): 20-32, 1999

      24 Ernst, H., "Patenting strategies in the German mechanical engineering industry and their relationship to company performance" 15 (15): 225-240, 1995

      25 Lanjouw, J.O., "Patent protection in the shadow of infringement-simulation extimations of patent value" 65 (65): 671-710, 1998

      26 Comanor, W.S, "Patent Statistics as a measure of technical change" 77 (77): 392-398, 1969

      27 Griliches, Z., "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators:A Survey" 28 (28): 1661-1707, 1990

      28 Lanjouw, J.O, "Patent Quality and research Productivity:Measuring Innovation with multiple indicato" 114 : 441-465, 2004

      29 Lin, B, "Patent Portfolio Diversity, Technology Strategy, and Firm Value" 53 (53): 17-26, 2006

      30 Chin, H., "Patent Citation, R&D Spillover, and Tobin’s q:Evidence from Taiwan Semiconductor Industry" 26 (26): 67-84, 2006

      31 Gilbert, R, "Optimal patent length and breadth" 21 (21): 106-112, 1990

      32 United States Patent and Trademark Office, "Office of the Chief Information Officer Operational Information Technology Plan"

      33 Hauser, J.R., "Metrics thermostat" 18 (18): 134-153, 2001

      34 Tong, X, "Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data" 23 (23): 133-141, 1994

      35 Hall, B.H., "Market Value and Patent Citations" 36 (36): 16-38, 2005

      36 Choi, W.W., "Market Valuation of Intangible Assets" 49 (49): 35-45, 2000

      37 Carpenter, M., "Linkage Between Basic Research Literature and Patents" 23 (23): 30-35, 1980

      38 Stewart, T.A., "Intellectual Capital" Nicholas Brealey Publishing 1997

      39 Villalonga, B., "Intangible resources, Tobin’s q, and sustainability of performance differences" 54 (54): 205-230, 2004

      40 Brockhoff, K., "Instruments for patent data analyses in business firms" 12 (12): 41-59, 1992

      41 Reitzig, M., "Improving patent valuations for management purposes-validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales" 33 : 939-957, 2004

      42 Harhoff, D., "Exploring the tail of the patent value distribution"

      43 Lai, Y, "Evaluating patents using damage awards of infringement lawsuits :A case study" 26 (26): 167-180, 2009

      44 Schankerman, M, "Estimate of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period" 96 (96): 1052-1076, 1986

      45 Cockburn, I.M, "Entry, Exit and Patenting in the Software Industry" 2006

      46 Chiesaa, V., "Designing a performance measurement system for the research activities :A reference framework and an empirical study" 25 (25): 213-226, 2008

      47 Harhoff, D., "Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights" 32 (32): 1343-1363, 2003

      48 Hirschey, M, "Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors" 11 (11): 91-107, 2004

      49 Ceccagnoli, M., "Appropriability, preemption, and Firm Performance" 30 (30): 81-98, 2009

      50 Guellec, D, "Applications, grants and the value of patent" 69 (69): 109-114, 2000

      51 Trajtenberg, M., "A penny for your quotes :patent citations and the value of invention" 21 (21): 172-187, 1990

      52 Chung, K.H, "A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s q" 23 (23): 70-74, 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.59 0.59 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.63 0.63 0.998 0.07
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼