RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      韓日日月起源神話의 比較硏究

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76250464

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      According to the comparison between the sun-noon origin mythologies in Korea and Japan, the two eyes are classified into some distinct types, viz., metamorphosis-type, human-transformation-type, autogeny-type, and provision-type in Korea, whereas they are grouped into metamorphosis-type, mirror-metamorphosis-type, human-transformation-type, and viviparity-type in Japan. Both Korea and Japan have metamorphosis-type and human-transformation-type in common. What: Korea has but Japan does not is autogeny-type and provision-type. Meanwhile, what Japan includes but Korea does not is mirror-metamorphosis-type and viviparity-type.
      When we consider this characteristic in connection with the myths in East Asia area, we com: to realize that Korea and Japan, both, are linked to the Chinese culture via the metamorphosis-type of the two eyes, whereas they are associated with Mongolian, Manchurian, and Siberian minority cultures by way of the human-transformation-type.
      In addition to this, Korea shows a unique mythological way of thinking, i.e., autogeny-type, among other regions of Northeast Asia. On the other hand, it was also confirmed that Korea is related to Manchurian, Mongolian, and Siberian mythologies through the provision-type. However, Japan is connected to the northern continent culture, which represents Tatar, Mongolia, Manchuria, and Korea, by virtue of the mirror-metamorphosis-type, whereas it was verified to have relationship with the Chinese culture via viviparity-type. In the meantime, the metamorphosis-type and human-transformation-type of the two eyes, which are shared by the two countries, are the instances thar were hardly found in the European mythology. From this evidence, the common mythological features, both in Korea and Japan, can be said to be typical of Asia, i.e., Northeast Asia, in particular, in contrast to Europe.
      번역하기

      According to the comparison between the sun-noon origin mythologies in Korea and Japan, the two eyes are classified into some distinct types, viz., metamorphosis-type, human-transformation-type, autogeny-type, and provision-type in Korea, whereas they...

      According to the comparison between the sun-noon origin mythologies in Korea and Japan, the two eyes are classified into some distinct types, viz., metamorphosis-type, human-transformation-type, autogeny-type, and provision-type in Korea, whereas they are grouped into metamorphosis-type, mirror-metamorphosis-type, human-transformation-type, and viviparity-type in Japan. Both Korea and Japan have metamorphosis-type and human-transformation-type in common. What: Korea has but Japan does not is autogeny-type and provision-type. Meanwhile, what Japan includes but Korea does not is mirror-metamorphosis-type and viviparity-type.
      When we consider this characteristic in connection with the myths in East Asia area, we com: to realize that Korea and Japan, both, are linked to the Chinese culture via the metamorphosis-type of the two eyes, whereas they are associated with Mongolian, Manchurian, and Siberian minority cultures by way of the human-transformation-type.
      In addition to this, Korea shows a unique mythological way of thinking, i.e., autogeny-type, among other regions of Northeast Asia. On the other hand, it was also confirmed that Korea is related to Manchurian, Mongolian, and Siberian mythologies through the provision-type. However, Japan is connected to the northern continent culture, which represents Tatar, Mongolia, Manchuria, and Korea, by virtue of the mirror-metamorphosis-type, whereas it was verified to have relationship with the Chinese culture via viviparity-type. In the meantime, the metamorphosis-type and human-transformation-type of the two eyes, which are shared by the two countries, are the instances thar were hardly found in the European mythology. From this evidence, the common mythological features, both in Korea and Japan, can be said to be typical of Asia, i.e., Northeast Asia, in particular, in contrast to Europe.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김헌선, "한국의 창세신화" 길벗 1994

      2 나경수, "한국의 신화연구" 280-, 1993

      3 김태곤, "한국의 신화" 시인사 1988

      4 "한국과 몽골의 창세신화 비교연구" 1999

      5 "중국창세신화" 아세아문화사 1998

      6 "일본의 고사기" 1987

      7 "우리나라의 천지개벽신화 비교민속학 비교민속학회" 1991

      8 更科源藏, "아이누 신화" 역락 2000

      9 "세계의 유사신화" 세종서적 1996

      10 "불교문화연구회" 문영출판사 불교설화대선 : 1981

      1 김헌선, "한국의 창세신화" 길벗 1994

      2 나경수, "한국의 신화연구" 280-, 1993

      3 김태곤, "한국의 신화" 시인사 1988

      4 "한국과 몽골의 창세신화 비교연구" 1999

      5 "중국창세신화" 아세아문화사 1998

      6 "일본의 고사기" 1987

      7 "우리나라의 천지개벽신화 비교민속학 비교민속학회" 1991

      8 更科源藏, "아이누 신화" 역락 2000

      9 "세계의 유사신화" 세종서적 1996

      10 "불교문화연구회" 문영출판사 불교설화대선 : 1981

      11 김선풍 외, "몽골신화와 상징연구" 1988

      12 "동아시아의 창세신화 연구" 소명출판 2002

      13 "동아시아 일월조정신화 비교연구" 한국구비문학회 14 : 2002

      14 김재용, "동북아 창조신화와 양성원리" 한국구비문학회 12 : 2001

      15 "星座讀解 日本神話" 大修館書店 2000

      16 "創造神話の事典" 靑土社 1998

      17 null, "世界の始まりの神話" 大和書房 1994

      18 "インドの神話傳說" 自由國民社 1992

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.39 0.39 0.42
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.46 0.44 0.796 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼