RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      THE INTERACTION BETWEEN PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=E806557

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      What a diversity of opinion!
      A well-known chemist' categorically denies that there is any interaction between philosophy and science; a prominent medievalist maintains that science is the chief incentive of philosophy, a leading physicist claims that philosophy decisively inspired science, and a distinguished metaphysician emphatically affirms that there is a mutual interaction between philosophy and science.
      If, in addition, we recall that some claim that science has no meta-physical presuppositions but does have philosophical implications while others maintain that the converse is true ─ claims which are stronger than those made by Randall and Heisenberg, respectively ─ we realize that all possible combinations of denial and affirmation have indeed been espoused.
      번역하기

      What a diversity of opinion! A well-known chemist' categorically denies that there is any interaction between philosophy and science; a prominent medievalist maintains that science is the chief incentive of philosophy, a leading physicist claims that...

      What a diversity of opinion!
      A well-known chemist' categorically denies that there is any interaction between philosophy and science; a prominent medievalist maintains that science is the chief incentive of philosophy, a leading physicist claims that philosophy decisively inspired science, and a distinguished metaphysician emphatically affirms that there is a mutual interaction between philosophy and science.
      If, in addition, we recall that some claim that science has no meta-physical presuppositions but does have philosophical implications while others maintain that the converse is true ─ claims which are stronger than those made by Randall and Heisenberg, respectively ─ we realize that all possible combinations of denial and affirmation have indeed been espoused.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼