At the first time, one of Supreme Court cases made me study about the issue discussed here-onto. It relates to the attribution of copyright in software development contract, especially in the existence of special agreement. Despite the spe...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76489665
2007
-
360
KCI등재
학술저널
129-145(17쪽)
2
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
At the first time, one of Supreme Court cases made me study about the issue discussed here-onto. It relates to the attribution of copyright in software development contract, especially in the existence of special agreement. Despite the spe...
At the first time, one of Supreme Court cases made me study about the issue discussed here-onto. It relates to the attribution of copyright in software development contract, especially in the existence of special agreement. Despite the special agreement. a copyright is held to be owned by creator herself at the very time of creation of the work. And the special agreement could be construed as an assignment of all copyright except personal rights. But it makes the time of assignment earlier, for example at the time of development completion. Here this paper takes a look at some related issues as followings; ① what is legal nature of the contract in case where a client makes software development contract with a developer. ② whether Civil Act can apply to the contract. ③ what means the special agreement providing acquisition of all rights by client. ④ how can the special agreement be constructed in void of the agreement. ⑤ whether the Article 5 of Computer Program Protection Act can apply to such a development contract between parties in special relationship. This paper tries to harmonically deal with the above issues in the aspect of civil law and intellectual property law related to software.<BR> In conclusion. a software development contract can be considered as a contract for work in many cases but its legal nature can vary according to real facts. The Civil Act applies to a software development contract as a contract for work but tangible-related provisions will be excluded. A special agreement will be void under two imperative provisions of Computer Program Protection Act. That is, Article 2 and Article 7. However. it can be constructed as another meaning, such as the assignment of rights or the time of copyright acquisition. From my broader perspective on the Article 5 of Computer Program Protection Act. the provision can be applied to a software development contract. Finally. this paper provides a systematic construction and reasoning of software development contract.
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2018-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2017-10-24 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-10-10 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review | ![]() |
| 2008-05-13 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.71 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.6 | 0.57 | 0.849 | 0.28 |