RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      소프트웨어개발계약과 권리의 귀속 = Software Development Contract and Attribution of Rights

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76489665

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

        At the first time, one of Supreme Court cases made me study about the issue discussed here-onto. It relates to the attribution of copyright in software development contract, especially in the existence of special agreement. Despite the special agreement. a copyright is held to be owned by creator herself at the very time of creation of the work. And the special agreement could be construed as an assignment of all copyright except personal rights. But it makes the time of assignment earlier, for example at the time of development completion. Here this paper takes a look at some related issues as followings; ① what is legal nature of the contract in case where a client makes software development contract with a developer. ② whether Civil Act can apply to the contract. ③ what means the special agreement providing acquisition of all rights by client. ④ how can the special agreement be constructed in void of the agreement. ⑤ whether the Article 5 of Computer Program Protection Act can apply to such a development contract between parties in special relationship. This paper tries to harmonically deal with the above issues in the aspect of civil law and intellectual property law related to software.<BR>  In conclusion. a software development contract can be considered as a contract for work in many cases but its legal nature can vary according to real facts. The Civil Act applies to a software development contract as a contract for work but tangible-related provisions will be excluded. A special agreement will be void under two imperative provisions of Computer Program Protection Act. That is, Article 2 and Article 7. However. it can be constructed as another meaning, such as the assignment of rights or the time of copyright acquisition. From my broader perspective on the Article 5 of Computer Program Protection Act. the provision can be applied to a software development contract. Finally. this paper provides a systematic construction and reasoning of software development contract.
      번역하기

        At the first time, one of Supreme Court cases made me study about the issue discussed here-onto. It relates to the attribution of copyright in software development contract, especially in the existence of special agreement. Despite the spe...

        At the first time, one of Supreme Court cases made me study about the issue discussed here-onto. It relates to the attribution of copyright in software development contract, especially in the existence of special agreement. Despite the special agreement. a copyright is held to be owned by creator herself at the very time of creation of the work. And the special agreement could be construed as an assignment of all copyright except personal rights. But it makes the time of assignment earlier, for example at the time of development completion. Here this paper takes a look at some related issues as followings; ① what is legal nature of the contract in case where a client makes software development contract with a developer. ② whether Civil Act can apply to the contract. ③ what means the special agreement providing acquisition of all rights by client. ④ how can the special agreement be constructed in void of the agreement. ⑤ whether the Article 5 of Computer Program Protection Act can apply to such a development contract between parties in special relationship. This paper tries to harmonically deal with the above issues in the aspect of civil law and intellectual property law related to software.<BR>  In conclusion. a software development contract can be considered as a contract for work in many cases but its legal nature can vary according to real facts. The Civil Act applies to a software development contract as a contract for work but tangible-related provisions will be excluded. A special agreement will be void under two imperative provisions of Computer Program Protection Act. That is, Article 2 and Article 7. However. it can be constructed as another meaning, such as the assignment of rights or the time of copyright acquisition. From my broader perspective on the Article 5 of Computer Program Protection Act. the provision can be applied to a software development contract. Finally. this paper provides a systematic construction and reasoning of software development contract.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 사실관계와 판결
        평석
        [ABSTRACT]
      • 사실관계와 판결
        평석
        [ABSTRACT]
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-10-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-10-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review KCI등재
      2008-05-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소
      영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.64 0.64 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.6 0.57 0.849 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼