RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Is the immediate blood pressure control using parenteral antihypertensive drug needed for patients with severe high blood pressure with epistaxis in the emergency department?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108329289

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: This study aimed to assess whether the conventional treatments administered in the emergency department (ED) for hypertensive urgencies (observed or peroral [PO]-controlled) in severe high blood pressure (BP) patients with epistaxis increase the incidence of epistaxis recurrence and the mortality rate as compared to immediate BP control using intravenous (IV) antihypertensive medication Methods: A retrospective study over 7 years was conducted at the ED of a tertiary university hospital. Among adult patients with spontaneous epistaxis, subjects with severe high BP (systolic BP ≥180 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥120 mmHg) were included in the study. Participants were divided into three groups determined by the methods used to control BP: non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups. The incidence of epistaxis recurrence and mortality rate within 6 months were compared.
      Results: Among the 380 patients enrolled, 238 were discharged from the ED without any pharmacological antihypertensive treatment (non-controlled group), 83 received PO antihypertensive medication (PO-controlled group), and 59 received IV antihypertensive medication (IV-controlled group). Of these, 29 (12.2%), nine (10.8%), and seven (11.9%) patients from the non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups, respectively, experienced epistaxis recurrence within 24 hours, which was statistically not different among the three groups (P=0.948). The 6-month mortality rates were determined to be 0.8%, 2.4%, and 3.4% in the non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups, respectively. The difference was also not significant among the groups (P=0.294).
      Conclusion: The conventional treatments of hypertensive urgencies (observed or PO-controlled) in patients with severe high BP with epistaxis in the ED did not increase the incidence of epistaxis recurrence and short-term mortality rate when compared to immediate BP control using IV antihypertensive medication.
      번역하기

      Objective: This study aimed to assess whether the conventional treatments administered in the emergency department (ED) for hypertensive urgencies (observed or peroral [PO]-controlled) in severe high blood pressure (BP) patients with epistaxis increas...

      Objective: This study aimed to assess whether the conventional treatments administered in the emergency department (ED) for hypertensive urgencies (observed or peroral [PO]-controlled) in severe high blood pressure (BP) patients with epistaxis increase the incidence of epistaxis recurrence and the mortality rate as compared to immediate BP control using intravenous (IV) antihypertensive medication Methods: A retrospective study over 7 years was conducted at the ED of a tertiary university hospital. Among adult patients with spontaneous epistaxis, subjects with severe high BP (systolic BP ≥180 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥120 mmHg) were included in the study. Participants were divided into three groups determined by the methods used to control BP: non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups. The incidence of epistaxis recurrence and mortality rate within 6 months were compared.
      Results: Among the 380 patients enrolled, 238 were discharged from the ED without any pharmacological antihypertensive treatment (non-controlled group), 83 received PO antihypertensive medication (PO-controlled group), and 59 received IV antihypertensive medication (IV-controlled group). Of these, 29 (12.2%), nine (10.8%), and seven (11.9%) patients from the non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups, respectively, experienced epistaxis recurrence within 24 hours, which was statistically not different among the three groups (P=0.948). The 6-month mortality rates were determined to be 0.8%, 2.4%, and 3.4% in the non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups, respectively. The difference was also not significant among the groups (P=0.294).
      Conclusion: The conventional treatments of hypertensive urgencies (observed or PO-controlled) in patients with severe high BP with epistaxis in the ED did not increase the incidence of epistaxis recurrence and short-term mortality rate when compared to immediate BP control using IV antihypertensive medication.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Chobanian AV, "The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report" 289 : 2560-2572, 2003

      2 Isezuo SA, "Relationship between epistaxis and hypertension : a study of patients seen in the emergency units of two tertiary health institutions in Nigeria" 11 : 379-382, 2008

      3 Sarhan NA, "Relationship between epistaxis and hypertension : a cause and effect or coincidence?" 27 : 79-84, 2015

      4 Thomas L, "Managing hypertensive emergencies in the ED" 57 : 1137-1197, 2011

      5 "Management of severe asymptomatic hypertension (hypertensive urgencies) in adults"

      6 Karras DJ, "Lack of relationship between hypertension-associated symptoms and blood pressure in hypertensive ED patients" 23 : 106-110, 2005

      7 Kim C, "Is epistaxis associated with high blood pressure and hypertension? Propensity score matching study" 38 : 1319-1321, 2020

      8 Kikidis D, "Is epistaxis associated with arterial hypertension? A systematic review of the literature" 271 : 237-243, 2014

      9 Grassi D, "Hypertensive urgencies in the emergency department: evaluating blood pressure response to rest and to antihypertensive drugs with different profiles" 10 : 662-667, 2008

      10 Rodriguez MA, "Hypertensive crisis" 18 : 102-107, 2010

      1 Chobanian AV, "The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report" 289 : 2560-2572, 2003

      2 Isezuo SA, "Relationship between epistaxis and hypertension : a study of patients seen in the emergency units of two tertiary health institutions in Nigeria" 11 : 379-382, 2008

      3 Sarhan NA, "Relationship between epistaxis and hypertension : a cause and effect or coincidence?" 27 : 79-84, 2015

      4 Thomas L, "Managing hypertensive emergencies in the ED" 57 : 1137-1197, 2011

      5 "Management of severe asymptomatic hypertension (hypertensive urgencies) in adults"

      6 Karras DJ, "Lack of relationship between hypertension-associated symptoms and blood pressure in hypertensive ED patients" 23 : 106-110, 2005

      7 Kim C, "Is epistaxis associated with high blood pressure and hypertension? Propensity score matching study" 38 : 1319-1321, 2020

      8 Kikidis D, "Is epistaxis associated with arterial hypertension? A systematic review of the literature" 271 : 237-243, 2014

      9 Grassi D, "Hypertensive urgencies in the emergency department: evaluating blood pressure response to rest and to antihypertensive drugs with different profiles" 10 : 662-667, 2008

      10 Rodriguez MA, "Hypertensive crisis" 18 : 102-107, 2010

      11 Michel J, "Guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL): epistaxis and high blood pressure" 134 : 33-35, 2017

      12 Theodosis P, "Epistaxis of patients admitted in the emergency department is not indicative of underlying arterial hypertension" 47 : 260-263, 2009

      13 Charles R, "Epistaxis and hypertension" 53 : 260-261, 1977

      14 Sundstrom J, "Effects of blood pressure reduction in mild hypertension : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 162 : 184-191, 2015

      15 Koroboki E, "Circadian variation of blood pressure and heart rate in normotensives, white-coat, masked, treated and untreated hypertensives" 53 : 432-438, 2012

      16 Patel KK, "Characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting with hypertensive urgency in the office setting" 176 : 981-988, 2016

      17 Byun H, "Association of hypertension with the risk and severity of epistaxis" 147 : 1-7, 2020

      18 Min HJ, "Association between hypertension and epistaxis : systematic review and metaanalysis" 157 : 921-927, 2017

      19 Knopfholz J, "Association between epistaxis and hypertension : a one year follow-up after an index episode of nose bleeding in hypertensive patients" 134 : e107-e109, 2009

      20 Muiesan ML, "An update on hypertensive emergencies and urgencies" 16 : 372-382, 2015

      21 Fuchs FD, "Absence of association between hypertension and epistaxis : a populationbased study" 12 : 145-148, 2003

      22 SPRINT Research Group, "A randomized trial of itensive versus standard bloodpressure control" 373 : 2103-2116, 2015

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼