BSC의 관점에서 公企業의 成果評價 指標 改善에 관한 硏究 = Improvement of the Performance Evaluation Indicators for Public Enterprises Based on the BSC

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

1. CONTENTS
(1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Public Enterprise are organizations which affect the national economy significantly and they generate crucial elements of the people including electricity, gas, currency and roads. However, there is a criticism that the Public Enterprise are run inefficiently. The government operates performance evaluation system to enhance the efficiency of the Public Enterprise, as well
as promoting the privatization.
The performance evaluation system is a system introduced to guarantee autonomy and responsible management system of the Public Enterprise. Accordingly, the performance evaluation system needs to have the following functions: to diagnose and evaluate whether the Public Enterprise conduct their essential duty in accordance with the initial plans, and influence the management and members of the organization by reminding them of their objective and roles. Furthermore, evaluation indications should provide a future-oriented direction to allow them to pursue innovation and performance enhancement.
In this regard, the purpose of this study is to present an evaluation indication based on Balanced Score Care(BSC), which is credited in academia and industry recently as an efficient evaluation measure for the organization. It is to guarantee autonomy and responsible management system of the Public Enterprise, and to effectively embody the objective of the performance evaluation system.
(2) RESEARCH METHOD
In this study, pre research was performed based on documentary survey in descriptive method. The analysis was made by having a file in each year's financial statements of 13 public enterprises and evaluating their financial strength and managerial efficiency. We have come up with some problems by reclassifying management evaluation index of 13 public enterprises(utilities) within the frame work of 4 BSC.
(3) RESEARCH RESULTS
To summarize the results of this study, first, based on the comprehensive examination of the various scholars' research results on the significance of the performance evaluation system for the organization and necessity of changes in evaluation methods, it is strongly advised to introduce a new evaluation method by the Public Enterprise in order to reflect the changes of policy environment and enhance the efficiency of the public agencies.
Second, as a result of analyzing the actual state of management of the performance evaluation system which is conducted by the government, it is found that the performance evaluation scores of the Public Enterprise tend to increase annually, so that it motivates the Public Enterprise to improve their performance. However, the current performance evaluation system has the following problems: insufficiency as a comprehensive performance measurement indication, lack of coherence for long-term and short-term indications, and lack of distinctive features of each agency. Consequently, the current performance evaluation system is incapable of appropriately evaluating the performance of the Public Enterprise, so that it is required to establish a new performance evaluation system based on BSC, which enables a comprehensive and balanced evaluation.
Third, the current evaluation indication system is analyzed based on BSC in this study. It is found out that the current evaluation indication system does not properly embrace customer perspective, financial perspective, internal business perspective and innovation & learning perspective, of which BSC aspires to embrace. Moreover, each indication is incapable of maintaining mutual causation, thus, it is necessary to design a system to form a causal relation between the above mentioned four perspectives and mutual balance, lagging and leading indications, long- and short-term indications.
Fourth, the performance efficiency of the 13 Public Enterprise is analyzed with their financial statements from 1997 to 2003. As a result of the analysis, it is found that the performance effic

목차 (Table of Contents)

• ABSTRACT
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 성과평가에 관한 이론적 고찰
• Ⅲ. 공기업 성과평가지표 체계 분석
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 參考文獻

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "지식기반조직체에서의 재무적 비재무적 성과측정 항목의 가중치 개발에 관한 연구" 서강대학교 경영연구소 10 : 17 -48, 1999

2 "지방공기업 경영평가지표 선정 및 가중치 설정 : BSC와 AHP의 활용을 중심으로" 2003.

3 "정부투자기관 경영평가제도의 유효성 연구 : 계량성과평가지표체계의 분석을 중심으로" 1991.

4 "정부투자기관 경영평가제도 및 운용체계의 개편방안" 한국공기업학회 12 (12): 2000.8

5 "정부투자기관 경영평가를 위한 비계량 평가지표의 개선방향" 한국공기업학회 12 (12): 2000.8

6 "정부출연연구기관 기관성과평가지표체계 분석" 과학기술정책연구원 2001.

7 "정부업무 기관평가제도의 분석적 조명" 한국행정연구원 59 -95, 2002

8 "성과평가의 기본적 개념과 틀 우리 나라 기업의 성과평가제도에 관한 연구보고서" 한국회계학회 (7) : 1997

9 "비재무지표의 가중치가 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국회계정보학회 16. : 2001.12

10 "비영리조직의 경영효율성 측정치와 경영실적평가 결과간의 관련성" 한국회계정보학회 17. : 2002.6

11 "기업가치평가요인에 관한 실증연구" 한국회계정보학회 17. : 2002.6

12 "균형잡힌 성과기록표를 활용한 공기업의 경영평가" 중앙대학교 경영연구소 26 (26): 2000

13 "균형잡힌 성과기록표(BSC)의 개념적 고찰" 중앙대학교 경영연구소 27 (27): 2000

14 "공기업론 (제5정판)" 법문사 2000.

15 "공기업 경영평가제도의 성과와 향후 과제" 한국행정학회 10 (10): 2001

16 "공공부문 성과측정의 이슈와 정책평가제도의 개혁방향" 한국정책분석평가학회 10 (10): 13-16, 2000

17 "경영평가제도의 회고와 방향" 한국행정학회 34 (34): 1996

18 "가치경영과 공기업 경영평가지표" 한국공기업학회 12 (12): 2000.8

19 "Why Balanced Scorecard Fail?" 6 -11, January1999

20 "Using the Balanced Scorecard to Develop Companywide Performance Measures Journal of Cost Management" 5 10-,

21 "Use of Non-financial Performance Measures" 31 33-, spring1992

22 "Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: PartⅠ" 15 (15): 88 -89, March2001

23 "The emerging federal quasi government: Issues of management and accountability" 61 : 290 -312, 2001

24 "The SMART Way to Define and Sustain Success" 22 23-, 1988.vol.8

25 "The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance" 71 79-, -19920102

26 "The Balanced Scorecard for Public : Sector Organizations" HBS Publishing 1999.

27 "The Balanced Scorecard : Translating Strategy into Action" Harvard Business School Press 21-29, 1996.

28 "Relevance Lost - the Rise and Fall of Management Accounting" Harvard Business School Press 253 256-, 1991

29 "Public Policy and Program Evaluation" Transaction Pub 1997.

30 "Performance measurement" 49 (49): 64-65, 2000

31 "Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing A Model for American Companies" Productivity Press 31 32-, 1991

32 "Performance Measurement System Design: A Literaure Review and Research Agenda" 15 (15): 80 -116, 1995

33 "Performance Drivers : A Practical Guide to Using the Balanced Scorecard" John Wiley & Sons 14-, 1998

34 "Ministerial Control of National Indestries" Columbia University Press 79-, 1970

35 "Journal of Cost Management" 47 52-,

36 "Innovation in Performance Measurement : Trends and Research Implications" 10 : 205 -206, 1998

37 "Innovation in Performance Measurement : Trends and Research Implications" 10 : 205 -206, 1998

38 "How to Design a Performance Measurement Program" 1992 (4) : 49-50, vol.4

39 "High Performance Work System and Firm Performance: A Sysnthesis of Research and Managerial Implications" JAI Press 53-, 1998

40 "Do Financial and Nonfonancial Performance Measures Have to Agree?" 28 35-,

41 "Design System to Manage for Results" 16 : 395 402-, 1993

42 "Creating a Comprehensive System to Measure Performance" 41 58-, 199210

43 "BSC(균형성과시스템)가 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구"" 2000.

44 "BSC 실천메뉴얼" (주)시그마인사이트컴 2001.

45 "A Review of State and Local Government Initiatives" An Urban Institute Press 312-, d.c.1980

46 "A Focus on Policy and Administration Ⅱ" 1145-,