RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국소마취와 전신마취로 시행된 비성형술의 환자 만족도과 합병증 비교 = Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Complications of Rhinoplasty between Local and General Anesthesia

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106664109

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background and Objectives Since rhinoplasty techniques require meticulous and delicatemanipulation, proper anesthesia is essential. The aim of the current study is to comparepatient satisfaction and complication of rhinoplasty performed under local anesthesia againstgeneral anesthesia.
      Subjects and Method Patients who underwent rhinoplasty by a single surgeon betweenMarch 2014 and January 2017 were enrolled in this study. Midazolam was utilized to sedatethe patient during local anesthesia. Pain and memory of surgery under local anesthesia, satisfactionof anesthesia, and willingness to undergo the surgery with the same anesthesia methodagain were evaluated. Cardiopulmonary events, nausea, and vomiting were assessed as complications.
      Aesthetic satisfaction of patients and the doctor was evaluated 6 month after thesurgery. The parameters were compared between local and general anesthesia.
      Results A total 120 patients were included in this study. The degree of pain was low duringsurgery under local anesthesia. Although most of patients remembered the process of surgeryduring local anesthesia, satisfaction of local anesthesia was high. The satisfaction of anesthesiaand willingness to undergo surgery with same anesthesia were not signifcantly different betweenlocal and general anesthesia. No serious complications developed during local anesthesiaand there were no signifcant differences of aesthetic satisfaction between local and generalanesthesia.
      Conclusion Patient satisfaction and aesthetic results of rhinoplasty performed under localanesthesia were comparable to general anesthesia, indicating that surgeons do not need to beafraid of applying local anesthesia in rhinoplasty.
      번역하기

      Background and Objectives Since rhinoplasty techniques require meticulous and delicatemanipulation, proper anesthesia is essential. The aim of the current study is to comparepatient satisfaction and complication of rhinoplasty performed under local an...

      Background and Objectives Since rhinoplasty techniques require meticulous and delicatemanipulation, proper anesthesia is essential. The aim of the current study is to comparepatient satisfaction and complication of rhinoplasty performed under local anesthesia againstgeneral anesthesia.
      Subjects and Method Patients who underwent rhinoplasty by a single surgeon betweenMarch 2014 and January 2017 were enrolled in this study. Midazolam was utilized to sedatethe patient during local anesthesia. Pain and memory of surgery under local anesthesia, satisfactionof anesthesia, and willingness to undergo the surgery with the same anesthesia methodagain were evaluated. Cardiopulmonary events, nausea, and vomiting were assessed as complications.
      Aesthetic satisfaction of patients and the doctor was evaluated 6 month after thesurgery. The parameters were compared between local and general anesthesia.
      Results A total 120 patients were included in this study. The degree of pain was low duringsurgery under local anesthesia. Although most of patients remembered the process of surgeryduring local anesthesia, satisfaction of local anesthesia was high. The satisfaction of anesthesiaand willingness to undergo surgery with same anesthesia were not signifcantly different betweenlocal and general anesthesia. No serious complications developed during local anesthesiaand there were no signifcant differences of aesthetic satisfaction between local and generalanesthesia.
      Conclusion Patient satisfaction and aesthetic results of rhinoplasty performed under localanesthesia were comparable to general anesthesia, indicating that surgeons do not need to beafraid of applying local anesthesia in rhinoplasty.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이종화, "개원가에서의 안전한 진정" 대한의사협회 54 (54): 1179-1188, 2011

      2 최진우, "감시하 마취관리 동안 자가 진정 조절을 이용한 propofol, propofol-fentanyl, propofol-ketamine 군에서 진정의 질적 효과, 부작용, 회복 양상의 비교" 대한마취통증의학회 50 (50): 428-433, 2006

      3 Taylor MB, "Ventilatory effects of propofol during induction of anaesthesia. Comparison with thiopentone" 41 (41): 816-820, 1986

      4 Al-Moraissi EA, "Local versus general anesthesia for the management of nasal bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis" 73 (73): 606-615, 2015

      5 Walder B, "A lack of evidence of superiority of propofol versus midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review" 92 (92): 975-983, 2001

      1 이종화, "개원가에서의 안전한 진정" 대한의사협회 54 (54): 1179-1188, 2011

      2 최진우, "감시하 마취관리 동안 자가 진정 조절을 이용한 propofol, propofol-fentanyl, propofol-ketamine 군에서 진정의 질적 효과, 부작용, 회복 양상의 비교" 대한마취통증의학회 50 (50): 428-433, 2006

      3 Taylor MB, "Ventilatory effects of propofol during induction of anaesthesia. Comparison with thiopentone" 41 (41): 816-820, 1986

      4 Al-Moraissi EA, "Local versus general anesthesia for the management of nasal bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis" 73 (73): 606-615, 2015

      5 Walder B, "A lack of evidence of superiority of propofol versus midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review" 92 (92): 975-983, 2001

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-04-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학 -> 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery -> Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
      KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-06-12 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery -> Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-06-14 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Society Of Otolaryngology -> Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Otolaryngology-Head &N -> Korean Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.13
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.13 0.306 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼