경매절차에서 청구권 보전을 위한 가등기의 효력 – 가등기담보 등에 관한 법률 개정방향을 포함하여 – = Effects of Provisional Registration for Preserving the Right to Claim in the Auction Procedure: Including the amendment direction of the Provisional Registration Security Act

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There is a precedent asserting that provisional registration only has the effect of preserving the priority, and provisional registration alone does not have any effect under a substantive law. If there is a registration of an intermediate disposition before principal registration according to provisional registration, the person having the right to the provisional registration may request the obligor for provisional registration to perform the principal registration procedure according to provisional registration for preserving the priority. However, it is contradictory to say that the person having the right to the provisional registration may request the obligor for provisional registration to perform the principal registration procedure, while the provisional registration alone does not have any effect under a substantive law. It is necessary to clarify that any disposition made after the provisional registration for preserving the right to claim is ineffective when the person having the right to the provisional registration applies for the principal registration. In addition, there is no regulation in the Provisional Registration Security Act regarding the effects of provisional registration in case of provisional registration for security, so there is a need to regulate it in a unified manner. In consideration of such fact, it is necessary to provide a regulation indicating “The disposition of an object made after provisional registration shall not be effective to the extent that it violates the right to be preserved by the provisional registration,” just as Article 187-2 of the revised bill of the Civil Act in 2004.
On the other hand, in practice, there are cases where provisional registration for security is also carried out for preserving the right to claim, and if the property for auction has been registered temporarily, the auction court cannot identify whether it is the provisional registration for securing the right to claim or it is the provisional registration for security. So, if the person having the right to the provisional registration does not submit a claim report, it is treated as the provisional registration for preserving the right to claim. In addition, the provisional registration for preserving the right to claim established before the security right to be lapsed by sale or provisional seizure is not lapsed by the sale, but is taken over by the buyer, so there are many cases in which auctions of temporarily registered real estate are miscarried. To address this problem, there is a need to establish a new provision stating “The provisional registration for preserving the priority that is not reported shall be presumed to be a provisional registration for security, and such provisional registration shall be lapsed by sale,” in Article 16 of the Provisional Registration Security Act.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김규완, "청구권보전 가등기의 실체법적 결과효" 안암법학회 (13) : 2001

2 최명구, "일반가등기와 부동산물권변동과의 관계" 민사법의 이론과 실무학회 25 (25): 2022

3 법원행정처, "부동산등기실무[III]" 2007

4 구연모, "부동산등기법" 박영사 2022

5 곽윤직, "부동산등기법" 박영사 1993

6 법원행정처, "법원실무제요 민사집행[II]" 2003

7 박경량, "민법학의 현대적 과제: 고창현박사화갑기념논문집" 박영사 1987

8 권성, "가등기･대물변제" 박영사 2010

9 김영희, "가등기제도-가등기에 의한 본등기시 중간처분등기의 직권말소와 가등기의 청구권보전의효력을 중심으로" 한국비교사법학회 7 (7): 2000

10 위계찬, "가등기의 효력에 관한 입법적 재검토" 한국법정책학회 7 (7): 2007

11 강태성, "가등기의 효력" 한국재산법학회 4 (4): 1997

12 김진현, "가등기의 실체법적 효력" 강원대학교 15 : 1982

13 홍성재, "가등기에 기한 본등기절차의 개정방향" 한국재산법학회 31 (31): 2014

14 김정수, "가등기가처분" 한국토지법학회 (16) : 2000