동아시아의 역사화해를 위한 시론 : 식민지 지배책임론을 제기하며 = Poetry for Historical Reconciliation in East Asia

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The root cause of the First and Second World War can be said to be the conflict between expansionist policies between imperialist countries, that is, colonial invasion and domination policy. The United States, who won these wars, needed a rhetoric to judge the defeated nations and claim their legitimacy in the name of civilization. This investigation is embodied in The International Military Tribunal for the Far East. The International Military Tribunal for the Far East limited the period from the killing of Jang Cheol-lin in 1928 to the defeat of 45 years, which led to the Manchurian incident in 1931. The International Military Tribunal for the Far East did not deal with various forms of crime in the process of colonization and control. The war responsibility theory commonly discussed in Japan in conjunction with the timing of The International Military Tribunal for the Far East does not include the responsibility for colonial rule. Therefore, it is necessary to change the structure of the discussion from war responsibility theory to colonial responsibility theory. This change is to declare that colonial rule by imperialist countries is against human universal values.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 현대사에 대한 재론 Ⅲ. 도쿄재판 재검토 Ⅳ. 일본의 전쟁책임론이 가지는 문제점 Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 치모토 히데키, "천황제의 침략책임과 전후책임" 경북대학교출판부 2017

2 이민효, "전쟁범죄와 법" 연경문화사 2010

3 이재승, "이행기의 정의" 법과사회이론학회 22 : 47-74, 2002

4 위르겐 오스트함멜, "식민주의" 역사비평사 2006

5 "더반선언문 및 행동프로그램"

6 "대법원 판결, 사건번호 2013다61381(징용에 의한 강제노동 피해자인 원고가 신일철주금을 상대로 낸 손해배상청구소송)"

7 최종길, "대동아전쟁과 다케우치 요시미(竹内好)의 전쟁책임론" 수선사학회 (64) : 279-309, 2018

8 김경원, "그들은 왜 일본군 ‘위안부’를 공격하는가" 휴머니스트 2014

9 藤原彰, "現代史における戦争責任" 青木書店 1990

10 永原陽子, "植民地責任論" 青木書店 2009

11 粟屋憲太郎, "東京裁判論" 大月書店 1987

12 粟屋憲太郎, "東京裁判への道" 講談社 2013

13 日暮吉延, "東京裁判" 講談社 2008

14 内海愛子 他, "戦後責任" 岩波書店 2014

15 赤澤史朗, "戦後日本の戦争責任論の動向" 2000 (2000): 2000

16 荒井信一, "戦争責任論" 岩波書店 2005

17 竹内好, "全集 第八卷" 筑摩書房 1980