RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      멀티미디어 학습 환경에서 연습문제의 유형이 인지적 기능의 획득에 미치는 효과 = Effect of practice problem format on cognitive skill acquisition in multimedia-based instruction

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959611

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study investigated if presenting problems only to the learner is more effective instructional procedure than the matched worked example and problem for the learners who already formed partial schema of the target cognitive skill. It also investigated if the results of two practice conditions is related to the achievement level of learners at practice phase. An experiment was implemented on 68 third grade elementary school students. Participants were randomly assigned either to problems only condition, to matched worked example and problem condition, or to reduced number of problems only condition. Participants studied a topic on mathematics in a multimedia based instruction. Learners` study time, their response correctness to the practice problems, and achievement level after the treatment were measured. Results revealed that problems only is more effective as a practice condition than the matched worked example and problem condition for the learners. The results of different practice conditions were related to the level of each student`s response correctness to the practice problems. The results also tell us that the effect of practice conditions depends on the number of practice problems learners actually have to try to solve for themselves. The results of this study suggest that it is a better instructional procedure to present enough numbers of problems only to the learners at practice phase than the matched worked examples and problems when learners already formed partial schema of the target cognitive skill. The results also suggest that learners` response correctness level is a variable that mediates the effect of different instructional treatments employed in this study.
      번역하기

      This study investigated if presenting problems only to the learner is more effective instructional procedure than the matched worked example and problem for the learners who already formed partial schema of the target cognitive skill. It also investig...

      This study investigated if presenting problems only to the learner is more effective instructional procedure than the matched worked example and problem for the learners who already formed partial schema of the target cognitive skill. It also investigated if the results of two practice conditions is related to the achievement level of learners at practice phase. An experiment was implemented on 68 third grade elementary school students. Participants were randomly assigned either to problems only condition, to matched worked example and problem condition, or to reduced number of problems only condition. Participants studied a topic on mathematics in a multimedia based instruction. Learners` study time, their response correctness to the practice problems, and achievement level after the treatment were measured. Results revealed that problems only is more effective as a practice condition than the matched worked example and problem condition for the learners. The results of different practice conditions were related to the level of each student`s response correctness to the practice problems. The results also tell us that the effect of practice conditions depends on the number of practice problems learners actually have to try to solve for themselves. The results of this study suggest that it is a better instructional procedure to present enough numbers of problems only to the learners at practice phase than the matched worked examples and problems when learners already formed partial schema of the target cognitive skill. The results also suggest that learners` response correctness level is a variable that mediates the effect of different instructional treatments employed in this study.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 오선화, "하이퍼텍스트 학습환경에서 학습전략, 메타인지, 작동기억이 성취도에 미치는 영향" 10 (10): 35-63, 2004

      2 진화봉, "언어정보와 시각정보의 통합과정에 관여하는 작동기억 기제" 19 (19): 51-75, 2003

      3 차영준, "비모수 검정" 自由 아카데미 2001

      4 이현정, "멀티미디어 학습환경에서 학습자 특성별 인지부하 효과" 21 (21): 79-102, 2005

      5 진화봉, "멀티미디어 학습 환경에서 통합촉진 전략이 인지부하에 미치는 효과" 19 (19): 139-160, 2003

      6 오선아, "멀티미디어 보조학습에서 정보제시유형이 작동기억 부하에 미치는 효과" 9 (9): 71-99, 2003

      7 Chandler, "When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples Journal of Educational Psychology" 93 : 579-588, 2001

      8 Owen, "What do students learn while solving mathematics problems Journal of Educational Psychology" 272-284, 1985

      9 Carroll,W.M, "Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom" 86 : 360-367, 1994

      10 Atkinson, "Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems Combining fading with prompting fosters learning Journal of Educational Psychology" 95 : 774-783, 2003

      1 오선화, "하이퍼텍스트 학습환경에서 학습전략, 메타인지, 작동기억이 성취도에 미치는 영향" 10 (10): 35-63, 2004

      2 진화봉, "언어정보와 시각정보의 통합과정에 관여하는 작동기억 기제" 19 (19): 51-75, 2003

      3 차영준, "비모수 검정" 自由 아카데미 2001

      4 이현정, "멀티미디어 학습환경에서 학습자 특성별 인지부하 효과" 21 (21): 79-102, 2005

      5 진화봉, "멀티미디어 학습 환경에서 통합촉진 전략이 인지부하에 미치는 효과" 19 (19): 139-160, 2003

      6 오선아, "멀티미디어 보조학습에서 정보제시유형이 작동기억 부하에 미치는 효과" 9 (9): 71-99, 2003

      7 Chandler, "When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples Journal of Educational Psychology" 93 : 579-588, 2001

      8 Owen, "What do students learn while solving mathematics problems Journal of Educational Psychology" 272-284, 1985

      9 Carroll,W.M, "Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom" 86 : 360-367, 1994

      10 Atkinson, "Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems Combining fading with prompting fosters learning Journal of Educational Psychology" 95 : 774-783, 2003

      11 Paas,F, "Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem solving skill in statistics:A cognitive load approach" 84 : 429-434, 1992

      12 & Cooper, "The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra" 59-89, 1985

      13 Anderson, "The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill Journal of Experimental Psychology" Fincham 23 : 932-945, 1997

      14 Clarke, "The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet Applications" 53 (53): 15-24, 2005

      15 Ayres, "The expertise reversal effect" 38 : 23-31, 2003

      16 Trafton, "The contributions of studying examples and solving problems to skill acquisition Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society" 1993

      17 A, "Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skills acquisition" 38 : 15-22, 2003

      18 Yeung, "Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes" 23 : 1-21, 1998

      19 Quilici, "Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems Journal of Educational Psychology" 88 : 144-161, 1996

      20 Mayer, "Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning" 38 (38): 43-52, 2003

      21 Mayer,R.E, "Multimedia learning" Cambridge University Press 2001

      22 Chandler, "Levels of expertise and instructional design" 1-17, 1998

      23 Mwangi, W., & Sweller, J., "Learning to solve compare word problems The effect of example format and generating self-explanations" 16 : 173-199, 1998

      24 Zhu, "Learning mathematics from examples and by doing" 137-166, 1987

      25 Renkl,A, "Learning from worked-out examples:A study on individual differences" 21 : 1-29, 1997

      26 Atkinson, "Learning from examples Instructional principles from the worked examples research Review of Educational Research" 70 : 181-214, 2000

      27 Mayer, R. E, "Learning and Instruction" Prentice-Hall 2003

      28 Chandler, "Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance" 21 : 5-23, 2001

      29 Van Merrienboer, "Instructional strategies and tactics for the design of introductory computer programming courses in high school" 252-285, 1987

      30 Chandler, "Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction Journal of Educational Psychology" 92 : 126-136, 2000

      31 Chi, "How student study and use examples in learning to solve problems" 1989

      32 "Guidance during mathematical problem solving Journal of Educational Psychology" 424-436, 1988

      33 A, "From studying examples to solving problems Proceeding of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society" 393-398, 2000

      34 A, "From example study to problem solving Journal of Experimental Education" 70 : 293-315, 2002

      35 Tuovinen, J., & Paas, F, "Exploring Multidimensional Approaches to the Efficiency of Instructional Conditions" 32 : 133-152, 2004

      36 & Levine, "Effects of sub-goal density on means-ends analysis and learning Journal of Experimental Psychology" 463-474, 1982

      37 Cooper, "Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer Journal of Educational Psychology" 347-362, 1987

      38 Chandler, "Cogntive load and selective attention as factors in the structuring of technical material Jouranl of Experimental Psychology" 176-192, 1990

      39 VanLehn,K, "Cognitive skill acquisition" 47 : 513-539, 1996

      40 A, "Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments" 38 (38): 1-4, 2003

      41 Anderson,J.R, "Acquisition of cognitive skill" 89 : 369-403, 1982

      42 Mayer, "A split-attention effect in multimedia learning Evidence for dual-processing systems in working memory Journal of Educational Psychology" 90 : 312-320, 1998

      43 Tuoviane, J., & Sweller, J, "A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples Journal of Educational Psychology" 91 : 334-341, 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼