RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    고등학교 성취평가제 실행에 대한 과학과 교사들의 인식 조사 = A Study on Science Teachers' Perceptions of the Implementation of the Standards-based Assessment in High School

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109283864

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigated the operation status and perceptions of the achievement standards-based assessment among high school science teachers, and discussed ways to support the achievement standards-based assessment in the introduction of the high school credit system. Teachers lacked understanding of key terms and showed low implementation levels in providing feedback through analysis of assessment results and developing assessment tools. In developing assessment tools that take into account achievement levels, there was a strong tendency to focus on the upper achievement levels, and consideration of the lower achievement levels was minimal. In developing assessment tools for the achievement standards-based assessment, teachers cited difficulties in aligning with rank based gradings, a focus on high-stakes discrimination, and difficulties in developing items to check achievement levels as the main problems. Teachers mainly used default cut-off scores by achievement level and school-calculated cut-off scores by achievement level, which made it difficult to estimate the expected correct answer rate for each item category and conceptualize the characteristics of the minimum competent students by achievement level. Due to the introduction of the high school credit system, teachers had the most difficulty determining achievement level E, and were concerned that grades would be inflated. Therefore, the development and dissemination of achievement level-specific assessment tools are needed, and practical monitoring measures should be put in place to identify and address specific difficulties in the field.
    번역하기

    This study investigated the operation status and perceptions of the achievement standards-based assessment among high school science teachers, and discussed ways to support the achievement standards-based assessment in the introduction of the high sch...

    This study investigated the operation status and perceptions of the achievement standards-based assessment among high school science teachers, and discussed ways to support the achievement standards-based assessment in the introduction of the high school credit system. Teachers lacked understanding of key terms and showed low implementation levels in providing feedback through analysis of assessment results and developing assessment tools. In developing assessment tools that take into account achievement levels, there was a strong tendency to focus on the upper achievement levels, and consideration of the lower achievement levels was minimal. In developing assessment tools for the achievement standards-based assessment, teachers cited difficulties in aligning with rank based gradings, a focus on high-stakes discrimination, and difficulties in developing items to check achievement levels as the main problems. Teachers mainly used default cut-off scores by achievement level and school-calculated cut-off scores by achievement level, which made it difficult to estimate the expected correct answer rate for each item category and conceptualize the characteristics of the minimum competent students by achievement level. Due to the introduction of the high school credit system, teachers had the most difficulty determining achievement level E, and were concerned that grades would be inflated. Therefore, the development and dissemination of achievement level-specific assessment tools are needed, and practical monitoring measures should be put in place to identify and address specific difficulties in the field.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정은영, "The teachers’ recognition and the implementation of evaluation in life science Ⅰ at high school" 46 (46): 176-186, 2018

    2 Ministry of Education [MOE], "Step-by-step Implementation Plan for Full Implementation of the High School Credit System in 2025"

    3 노태희 ; 이재원 ; 강석진 ; 강훈식, "Secondary school science teachers’ actual and preferred types of assessment" 35 (35): 725-733, 2015

    4 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology., "Secondary School Academic Advancement Plan for Enhancement of Creativity and Character Education"

    5 Kim, S., "Research on Measures to Develop and Utilize Assessment Tools for Students’ Achievement Level Check" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2023

    6 Kim, Y., "Research and Development of the Achievement Levels of the 2022 Revised National Science Curriculum for Elementary and Middle Schools" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2023

    7 Park, E., "Report on the Results of the 2013 School Year Middle School Retake System Pilot School Operation Support" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2013

    8 Kim, K., "Monitoring of Achievement Standards-Based Assessment through the Analysis of the Assessment Results" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2022

    9 Park, H., "Measures to Improve the Achievement Standard-Based Assessment Following the Introduction of the High School Credit System" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2022

    10 MOE, "Instructions for Filling Out School Records for the 2024 School Year" 2024

    1 정은영, "The teachers’ recognition and the implementation of evaluation in life science Ⅰ at high school" 46 (46): 176-186, 2018

    2 Ministry of Education [MOE], "Step-by-step Implementation Plan for Full Implementation of the High School Credit System in 2025"

    3 노태희 ; 이재원 ; 강석진 ; 강훈식, "Secondary school science teachers’ actual and preferred types of assessment" 35 (35): 725-733, 2015

    4 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology., "Secondary School Academic Advancement Plan for Enhancement of Creativity and Character Education"

    5 Kim, S., "Research on Measures to Develop and Utilize Assessment Tools for Students’ Achievement Level Check" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2023

    6 Kim, Y., "Research and Development of the Achievement Levels of the 2022 Revised National Science Curriculum for Elementary and Middle Schools" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2023

    7 Park, E., "Report on the Results of the 2013 School Year Middle School Retake System Pilot School Operation Support" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2013

    8 Kim, K., "Monitoring of Achievement Standards-Based Assessment through the Analysis of the Assessment Results" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2022

    9 Park, H., "Measures to Improve the Achievement Standard-Based Assessment Following the Introduction of the High School Credit System" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2022

    10 MOE, "Instructions for Filling Out School Records for the 2024 School Year" 2024

    11 전소현 ; 이현주, "Exploring high school science teachers’ perceptions of instructional changes due to achievement standards-based assessment : Focusing on the impact of no longer indicating course ranking" 44 (44): 195-207, 2024

    12 Jin, K. A., "Exploring Student Assessment Strategies in Light of High School Reform Policies" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2019

    13 곽영순 ; 이일, "Exploration of high school science teachers’ perceptions on instruction and assessment of science elective courses in the 2015 revised curriculum" 41 (41): 183-192, 2021

    14 Ebel, R., "Essentials of Educational Measurement" Prentice-Hall 1991

    15 Ministry of Education [MOE], "Draft of the 2028 University Examination System Reform Plan to Prepare for Future Society"

    16 Ministry of Education [MOE], "Announcement of the Direction of the Reform of the University Admission System and the Direction of Innovation in High School Education in 2022"

    17 Son, M., "Analysis of Implementing Achievement Standards-Based Assessment in High Schools and the Directions for Its Improvement" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2015

    18 심재호, "An analysis of alignment between the national achievement standards and the school level assessment in biology domain of high school science" 43 (43): 131-144, 2015

    19 한화정 ; 심규철, "A study on the development ability of process-focused assessment instrument of in-service biology teachers" 49 (49): 133-142, 2021

    20 김유정 ; 이경건 ; 홍훈기, "A case study on teacher’s process-centered evaluation competency(T-PEC) : Focused on the case of a middle-school/a high-school science teacher" 39 (39): 695-706, 2019

    21 Heo, G., "A Study on the Evaluation and Improvement Measures for The Field Application of Performance Assessments in Elementary and Secondary Schools" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2001

    22 Noh, E., "A Study on Establishing the Standard of Course Completion for the High School Credit System" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2019

    23 Ministry of Education [MOE]., "A Plan to Improve the Competitiveness of Public Education that Supports the Growth of All Students"

    24 MOE, "2022 High School Credit System Improvement Research Group 3rd Workshop" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research 2022

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼