RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소프트웨어 프로세스 생산성 향상을 위한 동인기반의 CMM 수준평가 시스템(CLAS) 개발 = Developing an Enabler-Based CMM Level Assessment System(CLAS)for Improving Software Process Productivity

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104470022

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, the qualification of Capability Maturity Model(CMM) which is a dominant standard for improving software process productivity has drawn much attention as a critical competitive factor in software organizations. In order to prepare the qualification a lot of cost and time are typically required;it is important to make more economic efforts to minimize such resources of companies for the preparation. Therefore, this paper proposes a Web-based support system, CLAS(CMM Level Assessment System) to help companies which have interests in acquiring CMM qualification or even just improving their processes. This system contains an assessment survey tool based on enablers required to achieve the requirements of CMM, so can provide practical guidelines to help prepare the CMM qualification effectively.
    번역하기

    Recently, the qualification of Capability Maturity Model(CMM) which is a dominant standard for improving software process productivity has drawn much attention as a critical competitive factor in software organizations. In order to prepare the qualifi...

    Recently, the qualification of Capability Maturity Model(CMM) which is a dominant standard for improving software process productivity has drawn much attention as a critical competitive factor in software organizations. In order to prepare the qualification a lot of cost and time are typically required;it is important to make more economic efforts to minimize such resources of companies for the preparation. Therefore, this paper proposes a Web-based support system, CLAS(CMM Level Assessment System) to help companies which have interests in acquiring CMM qualification or even just improving their processes. This system contains an assessment survey tool based on enablers required to achieve the requirements of CMM, so can provide practical guidelines to help prepare the CMM qualification effectively.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 문송철, "프로세스 성숙도 인증 여부에 따른 프로젝트 품질 성과 및 조직 성과 차이에 관한 탐색적 연구 : CMM 인증 및 비인증 조직을 중심으로" 한국정보처리학회 11 (11): 387-396, 2004

    2 류진수, "소프트웨어 프로세스 개선을 위한 CMM과 ISO9001간의 비교 연구" 31 (31): 76-89, 2003

    3 양경식, "소프트웨어 생산성 지표 및 측정기준에 관한 연구" 4 (4): 41-55, 2005

    4 송태국, "구현사례를 통한 CMM이해" 피어슨 에듀케이션 코리아 2002

    5 Sarker, S, "Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation" 41 (41): 63-74, 2003

    6 Wu, I.L, "Understanding senior management's behavior in promoting the strategic role of IT in process reengineering:Use of the theory of reasoned action" 41 (41): 1-11, 2003

    7 Ashrafu, N, "The impact of software process improvement on quality:In theory and practice" 62 (62): 677-690, 2003

    8 Mutafelija, B, "Systematic Process Improvement Using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI" ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 2003

    9 Emam, K.E, "Success of failure? Modeling the likelihood of software process improvement" (029) : 98-15, 1998

    10 Stelzer, D, "Success factors of organizational change in software process improvement" 4 (4): 227-250, 1999

    1 문송철, "프로세스 성숙도 인증 여부에 따른 프로젝트 품질 성과 및 조직 성과 차이에 관한 탐색적 연구 : CMM 인증 및 비인증 조직을 중심으로" 한국정보처리학회 11 (11): 387-396, 2004

    2 류진수, "소프트웨어 프로세스 개선을 위한 CMM과 ISO9001간의 비교 연구" 31 (31): 76-89, 2003

    3 양경식, "소프트웨어 생산성 지표 및 측정기준에 관한 연구" 4 (4): 41-55, 2005

    4 송태국, "구현사례를 통한 CMM이해" 피어슨 에듀케이션 코리아 2002

    5 Sarker, S, "Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation" 41 (41): 63-74, 2003

    6 Wu, I.L, "Understanding senior management's behavior in promoting the strategic role of IT in process reengineering:Use of the theory of reasoned action" 41 (41): 1-11, 2003

    7 Ashrafu, N, "The impact of software process improvement on quality:In theory and practice" 62 (62): 677-690, 2003

    8 Mutafelija, B, "Systematic Process Improvement Using ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI" ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 2003

    9 Emam, K.E, "Success of failure? Modeling the likelihood of software process improvement" (029) : 98-15, 1998

    10 Stelzer, D, "Success factors of organizational change in software process improvement" 4 (4): 227-250, 1999

    11 Girish, H.S, "Software quality and IS project performance improvements from software development process maturity and IS implementation strategies" 2006

    12 Hall, T, "Software process improvement motivators:An analysis using multidimensional scaling" 7 (7): 93-114, 2002

    13 Komiyama T, "Software process assessment and improvement in NEC:Current status and future direction" 5 : 31-43, 2000

    14 Humphrey, "Software improvement at hughes aircraft" 1991

    15 Zahran, S, "Software Process Improvement:Practical Guidelines for Business Success" 1998

    16 Zahran, S, "Software Process Improvement:Practical Guidelines for Business Success" 1998

    17 나미자, "SW프로세스능력에 관한 현황과 기업성과에 관한 연구" 한국품질경영학회 30 (30): 2-46, 2002

    18 Emam, K.E, "SPICE:The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination" IEEE Computer Society Press 1997

    19 Davenport, "Reengineering Work through Information Technology" Harvard Business School Press 1993

    20 Baddoo, N, "Motivators of software process improvement:An analysis of practitioners' views" 62 (62): 86-96, 2002

    21 Rainer, A, "Key success factors for implementing software process improvement:A maturity-based analysis" 62 (62): 71-84, 2002

    22 Paulk, "Key practices of the capability maturity model for software" -1, 1993b

    23 Grewal, D.,, "Internet retailing:Enablers, limiters and market consequences"

    24 "IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers" 1990

    25 Mahanti, R, "Confluence of Six Sigma, simulation and software development" 20 (20): 739-762, 2005

    26 and Carleton A, "Case studies of software process improvement measurement" 1994

    27 Paulk, "Capability maturity model for software" -1, 1993a

    28 Staples, M, "An exploratory study of why organizations do not adopt CMMI" 2006

    29 Goldenson, D.R., "After the appraisal:A systematic survey of process improvement, its benefits, and factors the influence success" Software Engineering Institute. 1995

    30 Isacsson, P, "Accelerating CMM-based improvement programs:Accelerator model and method with experiences" 6 (6): 23-34, 2001

    31 James, D.H, "A systematic survey of CMM experience and results" 323-330, 1996

    32 Colaman, G, "A quality software process for rapid application development" 7 (7): 107-122, 1998

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-06-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 생산성논집 -> 생산성연구: 국제융합학술지
    외국어명 : Productivity Review -> Productivity Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal
    KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-12-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Productivity Review KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 生産性論集 -> 생산성논집 KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.78 0.78 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.77 0.76 1.06 0.16
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼