RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      A Study on the Homer Hulbert’s View on Neo-Confucianism : Focuses on His Views of Sejong and Yeongjo in his History of Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103640257

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Hulbert’s History of Korea was published in Seoul, Korea in 1905. His book is significant in many ways. First of all, it was a history book on Korea at the time of Korea losing it diplomatic sovereignty to Japan. Also, this book reflects a view-point of a Westerner on Korean history and tradition. In addition, Hulbert’s book is a good historical source to understand the Korean condition while he was serving for the Korean government.
      Besides the various historical significances of his book, this paper focuses on the subject that what was a Westerner’s view point about the kingship of Joseon. Joseon was the dynasty established based on the ideology of Neo- Confucianism. Although Neo-Confucianism was born in China, Joseon was the only kingdom adopting this ideology as a national creed.
      Although Hulbert understood Asia and especially Korea well, as a Westerner, he reflect unique view on the kingship of Joseon. It is important to analyze his view because Joseon’s kingship was very effective and well-functioning for him. His view-point with Western influences, he provided interesting analyses on the kingship of Neo-Confucian dynasty of Joseon. Although some scholars criticize his book, it is worth to analyze his book to see what a Westerner see of history of Korea. It is important to learn the different viewpoints on the history of Korea at the era of globalization. Understanding various viewpoints and historical approaches give more objective view in writing and understanding history.
      Achieving this goal, this paper analyzes the descriptions on the parts of Sejong and Yeongjo in Hulbert’s book. Throughout the 600 years of Joseon history, Sejong and Yeongjo were two king who exercised the centralized kingship than any other kings of the dynasty. The system of centralized kingship is the political aim of the Neo-Confucianism. Doing so, this paper will provide better understanding on the subject of Neo-Confucian political system as well as the political nature of Joseon. In addition, seeing this subject through an eye of Westerner provides the different viewpoint to understand the history of Joseon as well as Neo-Confucianism.
      번역하기

      Hulbert’s History of Korea was published in Seoul, Korea in 1905. His book is significant in many ways. First of all, it was a history book on Korea at the time of Korea losing it diplomatic sovereignty to Japan. Also, this book reflects a view-poin...

      Hulbert’s History of Korea was published in Seoul, Korea in 1905. His book is significant in many ways. First of all, it was a history book on Korea at the time of Korea losing it diplomatic sovereignty to Japan. Also, this book reflects a view-point of a Westerner on Korean history and tradition. In addition, Hulbert’s book is a good historical source to understand the Korean condition while he was serving for the Korean government.
      Besides the various historical significances of his book, this paper focuses on the subject that what was a Westerner’s view point about the kingship of Joseon. Joseon was the dynasty established based on the ideology of Neo- Confucianism. Although Neo-Confucianism was born in China, Joseon was the only kingdom adopting this ideology as a national creed.
      Although Hulbert understood Asia and especially Korea well, as a Westerner, he reflect unique view on the kingship of Joseon. It is important to analyze his view because Joseon’s kingship was very effective and well-functioning for him. His view-point with Western influences, he provided interesting analyses on the kingship of Neo-Confucian dynasty of Joseon. Although some scholars criticize his book, it is worth to analyze his book to see what a Westerner see of history of Korea. It is important to learn the different viewpoints on the history of Korea at the era of globalization. Understanding various viewpoints and historical approaches give more objective view in writing and understanding history.
      Achieving this goal, this paper analyzes the descriptions on the parts of Sejong and Yeongjo in Hulbert’s book. Throughout the 600 years of Joseon history, Sejong and Yeongjo were two king who exercised the centralized kingship than any other kings of the dynasty. The system of centralized kingship is the political aim of the Neo-Confucianism. Doing so, this paper will provide better understanding on the subject of Neo-Confucian political system as well as the political nature of Joseon. In addition, seeing this subject through an eye of Westerner provides the different viewpoint to understand the history of Joseon as well as Neo-Confucianism.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Osgood, Cornelius, "The Koreans and Their Culture" Ronald Press Company 1951

      2 Lee Sang-ik, "On the Concepts of “New Korea” Envisioned by Enlightenment Reformers" 40 (40): 34-64, 2000

      3 함한희, "Korean Culture Seen through Westerners' Eyes" 유네스코한국위원회 43 (43): 106-128, 2003

      4 김종명, "King Sejong’s Buddhist Faith and the Invention of the Korean Alphabet: A Historical Perspective" 유네스코한국위원회 47 (47): 134-159, 2007

      5 Weems, Clarence N., "Hulbert’s History of Korea, vol. 1 & 2" Hillary House Publishers 1962

      6 Kim Kwang-ok, "History, Power, Culture and Anthropology in Korea: Toward a New Paradigm for Korean Studies" 40 (40): 54-100, 2000

      7 Song Young-bae, "Confucian Response to the Shock of Western Culture: From Orthodox Resistance to Confucian Reformative Visions" 40 (40): 5-33, 2000

      8 이승환, "A Dialogue between Confucianism and Liberalism" 유네스코한국위원회 42 (42): 5-26, 2002

      1 Osgood, Cornelius, "The Koreans and Their Culture" Ronald Press Company 1951

      2 Lee Sang-ik, "On the Concepts of “New Korea” Envisioned by Enlightenment Reformers" 40 (40): 34-64, 2000

      3 함한희, "Korean Culture Seen through Westerners' Eyes" 유네스코한국위원회 43 (43): 106-128, 2003

      4 김종명, "King Sejong’s Buddhist Faith and the Invention of the Korean Alphabet: A Historical Perspective" 유네스코한국위원회 47 (47): 134-159, 2007

      5 Weems, Clarence N., "Hulbert’s History of Korea, vol. 1 & 2" Hillary House Publishers 1962

      6 Kim Kwang-ok, "History, Power, Culture and Anthropology in Korea: Toward a New Paradigm for Korean Studies" 40 (40): 54-100, 2000

      7 Song Young-bae, "Confucian Response to the Shock of Western Culture: From Orthodox Resistance to Confucian Reformative Visions" 40 (40): 5-33, 2000

      8 이승환, "A Dialogue between Confucianism and Liberalism" 유네스코한국위원회 42 (42): 5-26, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
      2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2018-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 () KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.44 0.44 0.41
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.38 0.38 0.811 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼