영상물의 제작에 있어서 시청각 자료 및 소품의 정당한 사용(fair use)의 범위 = Scope of Fair Use of Visual or Audio-Visual Materials and Set-dressing in Production of Audio-Visual Works -Analysis of Korean and American Cases

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The scope of fair use of copyrighted material is difficult to ascertain. Although scholars and practitioners point to four abstract factors such as the purpose of such use, the nature of the work using the material, the amount of the portion used, and the possibility of interfering with the market potential of the material being used, juggling these four factors has not produced a user-friendly guilde line that can be readily adopted and used by professionals in the cultural industry and the art world. This article attempts at establishing such guilde line, first by deconstructing the four factors from the empirical viewpoints ― namely, surveying how the weighing of the four factors actually play out in real cases ― and then by refining the central concept of transformative use again through the test of real cases. In this article, the author focuses on the scope of fair use as applied to the use of visual or audio-visual materials and set-dressing in production of audio-visual works such as films and television programs. The author arrives at a new practical definition of fair use, namely, using a copyrighted material for a purpose wholly different from the author's creative purpose to an extent narrowly tailored to that purpose.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 법률의 내용
• Ⅱ. 새로운 가설
• Ⅲ. 미국 판례들
• Ⅳ. 한국 판례들
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "전주지방법원 2005.12. 1. 선고 2005나1936 손해배상금" 2005

2 "선고 89나32908 손해배상"

3 "대법원 2006. 2. 9. 선고 2005도7793 저작권법위반" 2006

4 "대법원 2004. 5. 13. 선고 2004도1075 판결, 1998. 7. 10. 선고 97다34839 판결" 2004

5 "대법원 1997.11.25. 선고 97도2227 저작권법위반" 2007

6 "and Copyright in a Nutshell" West Publishing 1990

7 "Wade Williams Distribution, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Co., No. 00-5002, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5730" 2005

8 "Video Pipeline, Inc. v. Buena Vista Home 342 F.3d 191" 2003

9 "Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.155 F.Supp.2d 1" 2001

10 "Sandoval v. New Line Cinema Corp, 973 F.Supp. 40" 1997

11 "Ringgold v. Black Entertainment TV, 126 F.3d 70" 1997

12 "Monster Communications, Inc. v. Turner Broadcasting System, In 935 F.Supp. 49" 1996

13 "Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 900 F.Supp" 1995

14 "Los Angeles News Serv. v. KCAL-TV Channel 9, 108 F.3d 1119" 1997

15 "L.A. News Service v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc., 305 F.3d 924" 2002

16 "Kohn on Music Publishing" Aspen Publishers

17 "Kane v. Comedy Partners, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2003 WL 22383387" 2003

18 "Jackson v. Warner Bros.,Inc., 993 F.Supp. 585, 44 U.S.P.Q.2d 1603" 1997

19 "Hofheinz v. Discovery Communications, Inc., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2001 WL 1111970" 2001

20 "Hofheinz v. AMC Productions, Inc147 F" 2001

21 "Establishment of Vaduz" Black Inc Inc 503-, 1980

22 "Elvis Presley Enterprises v. Passport Video, 349 F.3d 622" 2003

23 "Castle Rock Entertainment v. Carol Publishing Group, 150 F.3d 132" 1998

24 "Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley Ltd.448 F.3d 60 C.A.2 (N.Y.)" 2006