RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      남녀 대학생들이 거짓말시 나타내는비언어적 행동단서의 차이 = Sex Differences of Nonverbal Behaviors During Deception

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104031602

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study was examined the sex differences of nonverbal behaviors cues during deception. 62 students participated in the experiment in pairs, with one of them as an subject and the other as an accomplice. 31 subjects(male; 15, female; 16) were led to cheat on an exam and were asked six questions about the exam individually. After separating lie and truth responses to each question, the mean frequency of nonverbal behaviors were compared when they were telling a truth with when they were lying.
      There were 16 nonverbal behaviors measured by frequency:paralanguage (latency period, high pitch of voice, speech hesitations, speech errors, frequency of pauses), facial characteristics (gaze aversion, smiles, blinking, use of tongues), body movements (illustrators, adaptors, hand and finger movements, leg and foot movements, head movements, trunk movements, shifting positions).
      The result of the research showed more behaviors of speech hesitations, smiles, illustrators, adaptors and showed less behaviors of speech errors, hand/leg/trunk movements when they were lying than telling a truth. On the other hand, sex differences of nonverbal behaviors during deception were found that female students showed less speech hesitations, hand movements when they were lying.
      번역하기

      This study was examined the sex differences of nonverbal behaviors cues during deception. 62 students participated in the experiment in pairs, with one of them as an subject and the other as an accomplice. 31 subjects(male; 15, female; 16) were led to...

      This study was examined the sex differences of nonverbal behaviors cues during deception. 62 students participated in the experiment in pairs, with one of them as an subject and the other as an accomplice. 31 subjects(male; 15, female; 16) were led to cheat on an exam and were asked six questions about the exam individually. After separating lie and truth responses to each question, the mean frequency of nonverbal behaviors were compared when they were telling a truth with when they were lying.
      There were 16 nonverbal behaviors measured by frequency:paralanguage (latency period, high pitch of voice, speech hesitations, speech errors, frequency of pauses), facial characteristics (gaze aversion, smiles, blinking, use of tongues), body movements (illustrators, adaptors, hand and finger movements, leg and foot movements, head movements, trunk movements, shifting positions).
      The result of the research showed more behaviors of speech hesitations, smiles, illustrators, adaptors and showed less behaviors of speech errors, hand/leg/trunk movements when they were lying than telling a truth. On the other hand, sex differences of nonverbal behaviors during deception were found that female students showed less speech hesitations, hand movements when they were lying.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      본 연구는 거짓말과 관련된 정서를 표현하는 데 있어서 남녀의 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해서 대학생 62명(남자; 30명, 여자; 32명)을 대상으로 2명씩 동성짝을 이루게 하여 한 사람은 실험참여자, 다른 한 사람은 실험협조자 역할을 하였다. 실험참여자는 주관식 중간과제 평가시험 동안 실험협조자의 주도아래 부정행위를 하였다. 그런 다음 일대일 면담과정에서 실험참여자들(남; 15명, 여; 16명)이 평가시험에 관한 질문에 답을 하는 동안 나타내는 비언어적 행동들의 빈도수를 측정하였다. 각 비언어적 행동은 언어혼란(답변지연시간, 목소리 높이, 말주저, 말실수, 잠시멈춤빈도), 얼굴동작(시선회피, 웃음, 눈깜박임, 혀내밀기), 몸동작(치장행동, 부연설명동작, 손/손가락 움직임, 발/발가락 움직임, 머리움직임, 몸움직임, 자세바꾸기)으로 총 16개였다. 각 비언어적 행동들의 평균 빈도수를 종속변인으로 하여 진술(진실·거짓말; 피험자내설계) × 성별(남․여; 피험자간설계) 반복측정 변량분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 진술에 따른 주효과는 말주저, 말실수, 웃음, 부연설명동작, 치장행동, 손/발/몸 움직임에서 나타났다. 즉 위의 비언어적 행동들이 거짓말의 탐지단서가 될 수 있는 것으로 나타났다. 한편, 성별에 따른 주효과는 발견되지 않았다. 그리고 상호작용효과는 말주저에서만 유의미한 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 남자는 거짓을 말할 때 말주저가 증가하는 것으로 나타났으나, 여자는 진실을 말할 때와 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 여성들이 남성들에 비해서 거짓말과 관련된 부정적 정서 표현을 더 잘 조절하고 통제할 수 있음을 보여주는 결과이다.
      번역하기

      본 연구는 거짓말과 관련된 정서를 표현하는 데 있어서 남녀의 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해서 대학생 62명(남자; 30명, 여자; 32명)을 대상으로 2명씩 동성짝을 이루게 하여 ...

      본 연구는 거짓말과 관련된 정서를 표현하는 데 있어서 남녀의 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해서 대학생 62명(남자; 30명, 여자; 32명)을 대상으로 2명씩 동성짝을 이루게 하여 한 사람은 실험참여자, 다른 한 사람은 실험협조자 역할을 하였다. 실험참여자는 주관식 중간과제 평가시험 동안 실험협조자의 주도아래 부정행위를 하였다. 그런 다음 일대일 면담과정에서 실험참여자들(남; 15명, 여; 16명)이 평가시험에 관한 질문에 답을 하는 동안 나타내는 비언어적 행동들의 빈도수를 측정하였다. 각 비언어적 행동은 언어혼란(답변지연시간, 목소리 높이, 말주저, 말실수, 잠시멈춤빈도), 얼굴동작(시선회피, 웃음, 눈깜박임, 혀내밀기), 몸동작(치장행동, 부연설명동작, 손/손가락 움직임, 발/발가락 움직임, 머리움직임, 몸움직임, 자세바꾸기)으로 총 16개였다. 각 비언어적 행동들의 평균 빈도수를 종속변인으로 하여 진술(진실·거짓말; 피험자내설계) × 성별(남․여; 피험자간설계) 반복측정 변량분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 진술에 따른 주효과는 말주저, 말실수, 웃음, 부연설명동작, 치장행동, 손/발/몸 움직임에서 나타났다. 즉 위의 비언어적 행동들이 거짓말의 탐지단서가 될 수 있는 것으로 나타났다. 한편, 성별에 따른 주효과는 발견되지 않았다. 그리고 상호작용효과는 말주저에서만 유의미한 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 남자는 거짓을 말할 때 말주저가 증가하는 것으로 나타났으나, 여자는 진실을 말할 때와 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 여성들이 남성들에 비해서 거짓말과 관련된 부정적 정서 표현을 더 잘 조절하고 통제할 수 있음을 보여주는 결과이다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김우룡, "비언어적 커뮤니케이션론" 나남출판 2005

      2 전우병, "거짓말 탐지의 비언어적 지표탐색과 훈련효과" 2005

      3 Buck, "personality and physiological variables in the communication of emotion via facial expression Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 587-596, 1974

      4 Ekman, "clues to deceit in the marketplace" 1985

      5 Kalbfleisch, "application of deception research in a troubled world Journal of Applied Communication Research" 308-334, 1992

      6 Ekman, "and body in detecting deceit Journal of Nonverbal Behavior" 125-135, 1991

      7 Nelson A.,, "You don't say:Navi- gating nonverbal communication between the sexes" Baror International Co 2004

      8 Zuckerman, "Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception Advances in experimental social psychology" Academic Press 1-57, 1981

      9 Trower, "University of Pittsburgh Press" 1978

      10 male, "This study was examined the sex differences of nonverbal behaviors cues during deception 62 students participated in the experiment in pairs with one of them as an subject and the other as an accomplice were led to cheat on an exam and were asked six questions about the exam individually After separating lie and truth responses to each question the mean frequency of nonverbal behaviors were compared when they were telling a truth with when they were lying" 31-,

      1 김우룡, "비언어적 커뮤니케이션론" 나남출판 2005

      2 전우병, "거짓말 탐지의 비언어적 지표탐색과 훈련효과" 2005

      3 Buck, "personality and physiological variables in the communication of emotion via facial expression Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 587-596, 1974

      4 Ekman, "clues to deceit in the marketplace" 1985

      5 Kalbfleisch, "application of deception research in a troubled world Journal of Applied Communication Research" 308-334, 1992

      6 Ekman, "and body in detecting deceit Journal of Nonverbal Behavior" 125-135, 1991

      7 Nelson A.,, "You don't say:Navi- gating nonverbal communication between the sexes" Baror International Co 2004

      8 Zuckerman, "Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception Advances in experimental social psychology" Academic Press 1-57, 1981

      9 Trower, "University of Pittsburgh Press" 1978

      10 male, "This study was examined the sex differences of nonverbal behaviors cues during deception 62 students participated in the experiment in pairs with one of them as an subject and the other as an accomplice were led to cheat on an exam and were asked six questions about the exam individually After separating lie and truth responses to each question the mean frequency of nonverbal behaviors were compared when they were telling a truth with when they were lying" 31-,

      11 smiles, "There were 16 nonverbal behaviors measured by frequency high pitch of voice frequency of pauses use of tongues"

      12 Phillips, "The social skills basis of psycho- pathology Alternatives to abnormal psychology" 1978

      13 Snyder,M, "The self-monitoring of expressive behavior" 30 : 526-537, 1974

      14 smiles, "The result of the research showed more behaviors of speech hesitations adaptors and showed less behaviors of speech errors hand/leg/trunk movements when they were lying than telling a truth sex differences of nonverbal behaviors during deception were found that female students showed less speech hesitations hand movements when they were lying"

      15 smiles, "The result of the research showed more behaviors of speech hesitations adaptors and showed less behaviors of speech errors hand/leg/trunk movements when they were lying than telling a truth sex differences of nonverbal behaviors during deception were found that female students showed less speech hesitations hand movements when they were lying"

      16 Snyder, "The psychology of self-montoring" 1987

      17 Gudjonsson, G., "The psychology of interrogations and confessions:a handbook" Wiley 2002

      18 Tang, "The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception Journal of Nonverbal Behavior" 177-202, 1988

      19 In J, "The motiva- tional impairment effect in the communication of deception" 51-70, 1989

      20 Argyle, "The contribution of social interaction research to social skills training" Guilford Press 261-286, 1981

      21 Buck,R, "The communication of emotion" Guilford Press 1984

      22 Frank,M.G.,, "The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high- stake lies" 72 : 1429-1439, 1997

      23 Vrij, A, "Telling and detecting lies:some future directions in research" Forensic Update 14-19, 1998

      24 Vrij, A., & Mann, S, "Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation:the case of a convicted murder." 15 : 187-203, 2001

      25 Elliot,G.C, "Some effects of deception and level of self-monitoring on planning and reacting to a self-presentation" 37 : 1282-1292, 1979

      26 Sternberg,R.J.,, "Social intelligence and decoding skills in nonverbal communication" 3 : 168-192, 1985

      27 Woo Byoung Jhon, "Sex Differences of Nonverbal Behaviors During Deception" Kyonggi University

      28 Rosenthal, "Sensitivity to nonverbal communication" Johns Hopkins University Press 1979

      29 Ekman, "Relative impotance of face and speech in judgments of personality and affect Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 270-277, 1980

      30 Zuckerman, "Posed and spontaneous communication of emotion via facial and vocal cues Journal of Personality" 712-733, 1979

      31 Garrido, E, "Police officers; credibility judgments:accuracy and esti- mated ability" 39 (39): 254-275, 2004

      32 Friedman,H.S.,Riggio,R.E.,, "Personality and the enactment of emotion" 5 : 35-48, 1980

      33 Ekman,P.,, "Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception" 32 : 88-106, 1969

      34 Remland,M, "Nonverbal communication in every life" Houghton Mifflim 2000

      35 DePaulo,B.M, "Nonverbal behavior and self- presentation" 111 : 203-243, 1992

      36 Hall, "Multichan- nel integrations of nonverbal behavior" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1985195-225

      37 Krauss, "Modalities and cues in the detection of deception Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association" 1976

      38 Riggio, "Manual for the Social Skills Inventory" Consulting Psychologists Press 1989

      39 Ekman, "Journal of nonverbal Behavior" lying and (lying and): 163-176, 1988

      40 Friedman, "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" Prince Understanding and assessing nonverbal expressiveness 333-351, 1980

      41 Riggio,R.E.,, "Individual differ- ences and cues to deception" 45 : 899-915, 1983

      42 Riggio,R.E.,, "Impression formation:The role of expressive behavior" 50 : 421-427, 1986

      43 Kraut,R.E, "Humans as lie detectors:some second thoughts" 30 : 209-216, 1980

      44 Zuckerman, "Human as lie detectors Journal of Communication" 129-139, 1980

      45 Archer, "How to expand your social intelligence quotient" 1980

      46 Zuckerman, "Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty Journal of Experimental Social Psychology" 378-396, 1979

      47 Lippa,R, "Expressive control and the leakage of dispositional introversion-extroversion during role- played teaching" 44 : 541-559, 1976

      48 Harper, "Encoding-decoding of nonverbal emotional message Sex differences in spontaneous and enacted ex- pression Journal of Nonverbal Behavior" 131-145, 1980

      49 Ekman, "Emotion in the human face" Pergamon Press 1972

      50 Ekman,P, "Differential communication of affect bt head and body cues" 2 : 726-735, 1965

      51 Lanier, "Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology" 1096-1103, 1983

      52 Vrij, A, "Detecting lies and deceit:the psychology of lying and implications for professional practice" John Wiley & Sons. 2000

      53 Ekman,P.,, "Detecting deception from the body or face" 29 : 288-298, 1974

      54 Vrij, A, "Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior" 24 (24): 239-263, 2000

      55 Vrij, A, "Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults" 30 (30): 8-41, 2004

      56 Davis,M.,, "Demeanor and credibility" 106 : 5-54, 1995

      57 Lindsay, "Cues to Deception" 74-118, 2003

      58 Akehurst,L.,, "Creating suspects in police interviews" 29 : 192-210, 1999

      59 Wagner, "Communication of individual emotions by spontaneous facial expressions Journal of Person- ality and Social Psychology" 737-743, 1986

      60 Vrij, A., "Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview" 129 : 15-29, 1995

      61 Riggio,R.E, "Assessment of basic social skills" 51 : 649-660, 1986

      62 Riggio, "Application of nonverbal behavioral theories and research" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc 3-23, 1992

      63 Feldman, "Application of nonverbal behav- ioral theories and research" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc 3-23, 1992

      64 Snyder, "Advances in experimental social psychology" Aca- demic Press 85-128, 1979

      65 Scherer, "Acoustic concomitants of emotional dimensions Judging affect from synthesized tone sequences" Oxford University Press (nverbal communi- cation) : 249-253, 1979

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.16 1.16 0.95
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.96 1.58 1.54 0.4
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼