RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    변혁에의 갈망과 과학적 사회주의의 조우 -1920년대 중후반 임화의 평론을 중심으로 = Encounter between desire for revolution and scientific socialism-focusing on Lim Hwa`s criticisms in the late 1920`s

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99968296

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since 1926, Lim Hwa started to have obvious identity as a proletarian critic until around 1930. In this period, he first started writing critics and become a member of KAPF. Especially the critics written in 1926`s showed how he started writing critics for certain reasons. The contents of those critics were related to art which makes freedom of suppression that individual encounters, and the liberation of arts itself which trying to get out of conservative arts. This point showed that he has paid attention on the political possi bility of literature at the starting point of his critiques. At the same time, it provided a clue for explaining Lim Wha`s internal motivation for having interest on proletarian literature. In 1927, he joined the anarchism controversies. Since then, he started to form his own identity as a significant debater of KAPF. In this controversies, he argued that KAPF should be separated from the anarchist influence, but showed the attitude of accepting the concept of `action of emotions` that anarchists had at the same time. He insisted proletarian literature should be developed in the process of joining action of emotions and scientific socialism. The action of emotions mean internal motivation for the revolution and scientific socialism means external principle for the realization of revolution. After 1930 when he moved to Tokyo, he had written critiques for literature, films, playing, arts and other areas of culture. The logic behind these critiques were based on `form and matter monism.` He had been influenced by `theory of purpose consciousness` mainly talked by Park Younghee and content-oriented trend, In terms of he emphasized the revolution of format, his critiques are distinguished from Park Younghee`s criticism. It proves that his criticism had not accepted as a political trend. Emphasizing these characteristics leads to explore new aspects of Lim Hwa`s interest on arts of politics or politics of arts whether he intended or not.
    번역하기

    Since 1926, Lim Hwa started to have obvious identity as a proletarian critic until around 1930. In this period, he first started writing critics and become a member of KAPF. Especially the critics written in 1926`s showed how he started writing critic...

    Since 1926, Lim Hwa started to have obvious identity as a proletarian critic until around 1930. In this period, he first started writing critics and become a member of KAPF. Especially the critics written in 1926`s showed how he started writing critics for certain reasons. The contents of those critics were related to art which makes freedom of suppression that individual encounters, and the liberation of arts itself which trying to get out of conservative arts. This point showed that he has paid attention on the political possi bility of literature at the starting point of his critiques. At the same time, it provided a clue for explaining Lim Wha`s internal motivation for having interest on proletarian literature. In 1927, he joined the anarchism controversies. Since then, he started to form his own identity as a significant debater of KAPF. In this controversies, he argued that KAPF should be separated from the anarchist influence, but showed the attitude of accepting the concept of `action of emotions` that anarchists had at the same time. He insisted proletarian literature should be developed in the process of joining action of emotions and scientific socialism. The action of emotions mean internal motivation for the revolution and scientific socialism means external principle for the realization of revolution. After 1930 when he moved to Tokyo, he had written critiques for literature, films, playing, arts and other areas of culture. The logic behind these critiques were based on `form and matter monism.` He had been influenced by `theory of purpose consciousness` mainly talked by Park Younghee and content-oriented trend, In terms of he emphasized the revolution of format, his critiques are distinguished from Park Younghee`s criticism. It proves that his criticism had not accepted as a political trend. Emphasizing these characteristics leads to explore new aspects of Lim Hwa`s interest on arts of politics or politics of arts whether he intended or not.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김석근, "후쿠모토이즘[福本主義]과 식민지하 한국사회주의운동" 고려대 아세아문제연구소 94 : 1995

    2 김영민, "한국문학비평논쟁사" 한길사 1993

    3 브르통, 앙드레, "초현실주의 선언" 미메시스 2012

    4 "조선지광"

    5 "조선중앙일보"

    6 "조선일보"

    7 이훈, "임화의 초기 문학론 연구-프로문학으로의 전환 과정을 중심으로" 국어국문학회 111 : 1994

    8 김윤식, "임화연구" 문학사상사 1989

    9 신두원, "임화문학예술전집 4(평론 1)" 소명출판 2009

    10 칸딘스키, 바실리, "예술에서의 정신적인 것에 대하여-칸딘스키 예술론" 열화당 2010

    1 김석근, "후쿠모토이즘[福本主義]과 식민지하 한국사회주의운동" 고려대 아세아문제연구소 94 : 1995

    2 김영민, "한국문학비평논쟁사" 한길사 1993

    3 브르통, 앙드레, "초현실주의 선언" 미메시스 2012

    4 "조선지광"

    5 "조선중앙일보"

    6 "조선일보"

    7 이훈, "임화의 초기 문학론 연구-프로문학으로의 전환 과정을 중심으로" 국어국문학회 111 : 1994

    8 김윤식, "임화연구" 문학사상사 1989

    9 신두원, "임화문학예술전집 4(평론 1)" 소명출판 2009

    10 칸딘스키, 바실리, "예술에서의 정신적인 것에 대하여-칸딘스키 예술론" 열화당 2010

    11 김미영, "식민지시대 문인들의 미술평론의 두 가지 양상 ― 임화와 권구현을 중심으로 ―" 규장각한국학연구원 44 (44): 175-199, 2008

    12 "문장"

    13 "매일신보"

    14 "동아일보"

    15 이종영, "내면성의 형식들" 새물결 2002

    16 안현정, "근대의 시선, 조선미술전람회" 이학사 2012

    17 랑시에르, 자크, "감성의 분할-미학과 정치" 인간사랑 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 () KCI등재후보
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 0.9
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.86 0.87 1.721 0.34
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼