RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    복식미학 연구를 위한 방법론 제안 -복식 비평 모델을 중심으로- = Methodological Approaches to Aesthetic Research on Dress- Focused on a Model for Dress Criticism -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104779423

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    A criticism model for dress was developed to offer a methodological insight into research on aesthetics of dress.Concepts from Edmund B. Feldmans art criticism model, James D. Carneys style-relative model of art criticism,and Sung Bok Kims fashion criticism model were borrowed and integrated to create a criticism model for dress,comprising identification of styles, descriptive features, aesthetic value features, external interpretation, socio-culturalinterpretation, and evaluation. Both inductive and deductive approaches for the identification of styles can be madein the process of dress criticism. In the former case, descriptive features and aesthetic features are sequentiallyidentified to locate the styles of dress. In the latter case, styles are identified first, and descriptive features andaesthetic features are identified accordingly. Logical criticisms can be made based on the critics backgroundknowledge of the history of dress and art.
    번역하기

    A criticism model for dress was developed to offer a methodological insight into research on aesthetics of dress.Concepts from Edmund B. Feldmans art criticism model, James D. Carneys style-relative model of art criticism,and Sung Bok Kims fashion cri...

    A criticism model for dress was developed to offer a methodological insight into research on aesthetics of dress.Concepts from Edmund B. Feldmans art criticism model, James D. Carneys style-relative model of art criticism,and Sung Bok Kims fashion criticism model were borrowed and integrated to create a criticism model for dress,comprising identification of styles, descriptive features, aesthetic value features, external interpretation, socio-culturalinterpretation, and evaluation. Both inductive and deductive approaches for the identification of styles can be madein the process of dress criticism. In the former case, descriptive features and aesthetic features are sequentiallyidentified to locate the styles of dress. In the latter case, styles are identified first, and descriptive features andaesthetic features are identified accordingly. Logical criticisms can be made based on the critics backgroundknowledge of the history of dress and art.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "복식미학 강의1" 교문사 2004

    2 "미와 예술의 논리" 집문당 1995

    3 "and practice in Home Economics Journal of Theory in Home Economics" 1-14, 1991

    4 "Understanding aesthetics for the merchandising design professional" Fairchild Publications 1997

    5 "The social psychology of clothing" Fairchild Publications 1997

    6 "The growth of sociological theories" Sage 1984

    7 "Individuality in clothing selection and personal appearance" Macmillan 1986

    8 "Fashion as a domain of aesthetic inquiry" New York University 1997

    9 "Dress as a cultural sub-system A unifying metatheory for Clothing and Textiles" 1-7, 1987

    10 "Dress and identity" 10 (10): 1-8, 1992

    1 "복식미학 강의1" 교문사 2004

    2 "미와 예술의 논리" 집문당 1995

    3 "and practice in Home Economics Journal of Theory in Home Economics" 1-14, 1991

    4 "Understanding aesthetics for the merchandising design professional" Fairchild Publications 1997

    5 "The social psychology of clothing" Fairchild Publications 1997

    6 "The growth of sociological theories" Sage 1984

    7 "Individuality in clothing selection and personal appearance" Macmillan 1986

    8 "Fashion as a domain of aesthetic inquiry" New York University 1997

    9 "Dress as a cultural sub-system A unifying metatheory for Clothing and Textiles" 1-7, 1987

    10 "Dress and identity" 10 (10): 1-8, 1992

    11 "Consumer behavior toward dress" 1979

    12 "Art as image and idea" Prentice-Hall Inc 1967

    13 "A paradigm for the study of the social meanings of clothes Complementarity of social-psychological theories" 53-62, 1991

    14 "A historical theory of art criticism" 28 (28): 13-29, 1994

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-11 통합 KCI등재
    2013-06-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한가정학회지 -> Family and Environment Research
    외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association -> Family and Environment Research
    KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-11-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.76 0.76 0.96
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.02 1.04 1.279 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼