RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인도 종교의 이단(異端)과 외도(外道) 논쟁에 대한 고찰 = A Study on the Controversies of nastika and titthiya in Indian Religions

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105033544

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study, focusing on the interrelationship between social change and religious debate, attempts to explain the controversies of nastika (heterodoxy) of Vedic religion and of titthiya (non-Buddhist) of Buddhism in one context. India experienced political, economic and social changes in the 6th century BCE. Religiously, the period is characterized by the confrontations between Brahmanism of the old Vedic tradition and the newly emerging thinkers of non-Vedic tradition. The latter rejected the Vedic sacrifice and was negative about the caste system. When their teachings were rapidly propagating in northern India, the debate of nastika was beginning with the lawmakers of Brahmanism, who felt they were threats and defined their teachings as nastika. Gotama Buddha, who was among the thinkers of non-Vedic tradition, penetrated into the core of the problems which Brahmanism and non-Vedic ideas had at the time. He confronted Brahmanism with the doctrine of ahimsa (non-killing) and anatta (non-self), criticized the thinkers who ignored the importance and causality of human behavior, and emphasized the religious ethics with the doctrine of the Eightfold Path. The controversies of nastika and titthiya in India, resultingly, were an opportunity to recognize the importance of religious ethics. Ethical issue, since then, have been presented as a main criterion for astika (orthodoxy) and nastika disputes in Indian religious history.
    번역하기

    This study, focusing on the interrelationship between social change and religious debate, attempts to explain the controversies of nastika (heterodoxy) of Vedic religion and of titthiya (non-Buddhist) of Buddhism in one context. India experienced poli...

    This study, focusing on the interrelationship between social change and religious debate, attempts to explain the controversies of nastika (heterodoxy) of Vedic religion and of titthiya (non-Buddhist) of Buddhism in one context. India experienced political, economic and social changes in the 6th century BCE. Religiously, the period is characterized by the confrontations between Brahmanism of the old Vedic tradition and the newly emerging thinkers of non-Vedic tradition. The latter rejected the Vedic sacrifice and was negative about the caste system. When their teachings were rapidly propagating in northern India, the debate of nastika was beginning with the lawmakers of Brahmanism, who felt they were threats and defined their teachings as nastika. Gotama Buddha, who was among the thinkers of non-Vedic tradition, penetrated into the core of the problems which Brahmanism and non-Vedic ideas had at the time. He confronted Brahmanism with the doctrine of ahimsa (non-killing) and anatta (non-self), criticized the thinkers who ignored the importance and causality of human behavior, and emphasized the religious ethics with the doctrine of the Eightfold Path. The controversies of nastika and titthiya in India, resultingly, were an opportunity to recognize the importance of religious ethics. Ethical issue, since then, have been presented as a main criterion for astika (orthodoxy) and nastika disputes in Indian religious history.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 강신보, "초기 불교의 팔정도와 중용의 덕과의 비교" 한국인도학회 6 (6): 2001

    2 남수영, "초기 불교의 중도 개념 재검토" 인도연구소 21 (21): 57-86, 2015

    3 "종교학대사전, “이단”"

    4 유성욱, "인도의 역사 1" 종교와이성 2007

    5 아키라, 히라카와, "인도불교의 역사(상)" 민족사 2004

    6 황순일, "아지비까(Ājīvika)를 중심으로 본 윤회와 행위이론의 인도적 기원" 인도철학회 (26) : 151-176, 2009

    7 이재숙, "마누법전" 한길사 1999

    8 김수아, "논문 : 불교에서 비판하는 외도와 인도철학사상" 종교문제연구소 (15) : 163-182, 2008

    9 Nicholson, Andrew J, "Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History" Columbia University Press 2013

    10 Gombrich, Richard, "Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo" Routledge 2002

    1 강신보, "초기 불교의 팔정도와 중용의 덕과의 비교" 한국인도학회 6 (6): 2001

    2 남수영, "초기 불교의 중도 개념 재검토" 인도연구소 21 (21): 57-86, 2015

    3 "종교학대사전, “이단”"

    4 유성욱, "인도의 역사 1" 종교와이성 2007

    5 아키라, 히라카와, "인도불교의 역사(상)" 민족사 2004

    6 황순일, "아지비까(Ājīvika)를 중심으로 본 윤회와 행위이론의 인도적 기원" 인도철학회 (26) : 151-176, 2009

    7 이재숙, "마누법전" 한길사 1999

    8 김수아, "논문 : 불교에서 비판하는 외도와 인도철학사상" 종교문제연구소 (15) : 163-182, 2008

    9 Nicholson, Andrew J, "Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History" Columbia University Press 2013

    10 Gombrich, Richard, "Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo" Routledge 2002

    11 Chakravarti, Uma, "The Social Dimensions of Early Buddhism" Munshiram Manoharlal 1996

    12 Müller, M. Max, "The Sacred Books of the East (Vol. 13 Mahāvagga)" Motilal Banarsidass 1998

    13 Müller, M. Max, "The Sacred Books of the East (Vol. 10 Dhammapada)" Motilal Banarsidass 1998

    14 Bhattacharyya, Ramkrishna, "Reasoners and religious law-makers: an ancient Indian case study" 26 (26): 2009

    15 Sharma, R. S, "Material Culture and Social Formations in Ancient India" MacMillan 1997

    16 Kosambi, D. D, "Introduction to Indian History, Bombay, Popular Prakashan" 1998

    17 Dasgupta, S. N, "Indian Philosophy (vol. 1)" Motilal Banrsidass 1992

    18 Winternitz, M, "History of Indian Literature I" Munshiram Manoharlal 1991

    19 Plott, John C, "Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1" Motilal Banarsidass 2000

    20 Buddhadatta, A. P, "English-Pali Dictionary" Motilal Banarsidass 1997

    21 Potter, Karl H, "Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies Ⅷ : Buddhist Philosophy from 100 to 350 AD" Motilal Banarsidass 1999

    22 Eliade, M, "Encyclopecia of Religion, Vol. 11" MacMillan 1988

    23 Thapar, Romila, "Early India from the Origins to AD 1300" Penguin Books 2002

    24 Varma, Vishwanath Prasad, "Early Buddhism and Its Origin" Munshiram Manoharlal 1973

    25 Rhys Davids, T. W, "Dīgha Nikaya: Dialogues of the Buddha" Motilal Banarsidass 2000

    26 Jaini, Padmanabh S, "Collected Papers on Buddhist Studies" Motilal Banarsidass 2001

    27 Joshi, Lal Mani, "Brahmanism, Buddhism, and Hinduism, Kandy" Buddhist Publication Society 2007

    28 Sharma, Krishna, "Bhakti and the Bhakti Movement: A New Perspective" Munshiram Manoharlal 1987

    29 Olivelle, Patrick, "Between the Empires: Society in India 300 BCE to 400 CE:Society in India" Oxford University Press 2006

    30 Thera, Nyanaponika, "Aṅguttara Nikāya: Discourses of the Buddha an Anthology Part 1, Kandy" Buddhist Publication Society 2010

    31 Blackburn, Anne M, "Approaching the Dhamma:Buddhist Texts and Practices in South and Southeast Asia" 2003

    32 Jha, D. N, "Ancient India" Manohar 1999

    33 Flood, Gavind D, "An Introduction to Hinduism" Cambridge University Press 1997

    34 Wolpert, Stanley, "A New History of India" Oxford University Press 2004

    35 Bapat, B. V, "2500 Years of Buddhism" MIBGI 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.34 0.34 0.36
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.33 0.33 0.736 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼