RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      The effect of the type of anesthesia on the quality of postoperative recovery after orthopedic forearm surgery

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106555251

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Although the quality of postoperative recovery may be affected by factors, there are few investigations whether the type of anesthesia also affects it. In this single-blinded, prospective, observational study, we compared the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing orthopedic forearm surgery under general or regional anesthesia (brachial plexus block).
      Methods: Ninety-seven subjects, aged 18–65 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, undergoing orthopedic forearm surgery, were allocated to general or regional anesthesia group. The quality of postoperative recovery was assessed using a validated Korean version of Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40K) questionnaire. Patients were surveyed three times, the day before surgery (baseline) and 1st and 7th day after the surgery, and the scores of both groups were compared.
      Results: We analyzed 47 and 50 patients in general and regional anesthesia, respectively. The global QoR-40K score and those of each of its five dimensions were not significantly different between the two groups at baseline, 1st and 7th day postoperatively. In two-way RM ANOVA, the global QoR-40K score at postoperative 1st day was significantly lower than that of baseline (P < 0.001) and postoperative 7th day (P < 0.001), respectively, in both general and regional anesthesia groups. However, there was no significant difference at each timepoint between the two groups.
      Conclusions: The present study suggests that brachial plexus block with intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion does not improve the quality of postoperative recovery compared to sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia with remifentanil infusion in patients undergoing orthopedic forearm surgery.
      번역하기

      Background: Although the quality of postoperative recovery may be affected by factors, there are few investigations whether the type of anesthesia also affects it. In this single-blinded, prospective, observational study, we compared the quality of po...

      Background: Although the quality of postoperative recovery may be affected by factors, there are few investigations whether the type of anesthesia also affects it. In this single-blinded, prospective, observational study, we compared the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing orthopedic forearm surgery under general or regional anesthesia (brachial plexus block).
      Methods: Ninety-seven subjects, aged 18–65 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, undergoing orthopedic forearm surgery, were allocated to general or regional anesthesia group. The quality of postoperative recovery was assessed using a validated Korean version of Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40K) questionnaire. Patients were surveyed three times, the day before surgery (baseline) and 1st and 7th day after the surgery, and the scores of both groups were compared.
      Results: We analyzed 47 and 50 patients in general and regional anesthesia, respectively. The global QoR-40K score and those of each of its five dimensions were not significantly different between the two groups at baseline, 1st and 7th day postoperatively. In two-way RM ANOVA, the global QoR-40K score at postoperative 1st day was significantly lower than that of baseline (P < 0.001) and postoperative 7th day (P < 0.001), respectively, in both general and regional anesthesia groups. However, there was no significant difference at each timepoint between the two groups.
      Conclusions: The present study suggests that brachial plexus block with intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion does not improve the quality of postoperative recovery compared to sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia with remifentanil infusion in patients undergoing orthopedic forearm surgery.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이준호, "Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire" 대한마취통증의학회 71 (71): 467-475, 2018

      2 Myles PS, "Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score : the QoR-40" 84 : 11-15, 2000

      3 Tanaka Y, "Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40" 25 : 509-515, 2011

      4 Abdallah FW, "Ultrasound-guided multilevel paravertebral blocks and total intravenous anesthesia improve the quality of recovery after ambulatory breast tumor resection" 120 : 703-713, 2014

      5 McNaught A, "Ultrasound reduces the minimum effective local anaesthetic volume compared with peripheral nerve stimulation for interscalene block" 106 : 124-130, 2011

      6 Lee WK, "Type of anaesthesia and patient quality of recovery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anaesthesia with desflurane anaesthesia" 114 : 663-668, 2015

      7 Catro-Alves LJ, "The effect of neuraxial versus general anesthesia techniques on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy : a prospective, randomized, controlled trial" 113 : 1480-1486, 2011

      8 Leslie K, "Quality of recovery from anesthesia in neurosurgical patients" 99 : 1158-1165, 2003

      9 Murphy GS, "Preoperative dexamethasone enhances quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy : effect on in-hospital and postdischarge recovery outcomes" 114 : 882-890, 2011

      10 Bosco L, "Pre-or postoperative interscalene block and/or general anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery : a retrospective observational study" 64 : 1048-1058, 2017

      1 이준호, "Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire" 대한마취통증의학회 71 (71): 467-475, 2018

      2 Myles PS, "Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score : the QoR-40" 84 : 11-15, 2000

      3 Tanaka Y, "Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40" 25 : 509-515, 2011

      4 Abdallah FW, "Ultrasound-guided multilevel paravertebral blocks and total intravenous anesthesia improve the quality of recovery after ambulatory breast tumor resection" 120 : 703-713, 2014

      5 McNaught A, "Ultrasound reduces the minimum effective local anaesthetic volume compared with peripheral nerve stimulation for interscalene block" 106 : 124-130, 2011

      6 Lee WK, "Type of anaesthesia and patient quality of recovery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anaesthesia with desflurane anaesthesia" 114 : 663-668, 2015

      7 Catro-Alves LJ, "The effect of neuraxial versus general anesthesia techniques on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy : a prospective, randomized, controlled trial" 113 : 1480-1486, 2011

      8 Leslie K, "Quality of recovery from anesthesia in neurosurgical patients" 99 : 1158-1165, 2003

      9 Murphy GS, "Preoperative dexamethasone enhances quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy : effect on in-hospital and postdischarge recovery outcomes" 114 : 882-890, 2011

      10 Bosco L, "Pre-or postoperative interscalene block and/or general anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery : a retrospective observational study" 64 : 1048-1058, 2017

      11 Na SH, "Patient quality of recovery on the day of surgery after propofol total intravenous anesthesia for vitrectomy : a randomized controlled trial" 97 : e12699-, 2018

      12 Tran DQ, "Minimum effective volume of lidocaine for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block" 36 : 466-469, 2011

      13 Myles PS, "Minimal Clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales" 125 : 39-45, 2016

      14 Gornall BF, "Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40 : a quantitative systematic review" 111 : 161-169, 2013

      15 Elkassabany NM, "Improved quality of recovery from ambulatory shoulder surgery after implementation of a multimodal perioperative pain management protocol" 20 : 1012-1019, 2019

      16 Donabedian A, "Evaluating the quality of medical care" 83 : 691-729, 2005

      17 Kim DH, "Efficacy of ultrasound-guided serratus plane block on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery : a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study" 126 : 1353-1361, 2018

      18 Kim SY, "Efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on emergence agitation and quality of recovery after nasal surgery" 111 : 222-228, 2013

      19 Kim HJ, "Effects of deep vs moderate neuromuscular block on the quality of recovery after robotic gastrectomy" 63 : 306-313, 2019

      20 McCartney CJ, "Early but no long-term benefit of regional compared with general anesthesia for ambulatory hand surgery" 101 : 461-467, 2004

      21 Elkassabany N, "Does regional anesthesia improve the quality of postoperative pain management and the quality of recovery in patients undergoing operative repair of tibia and ankle fractures?" 29 : 404-409, 2015

      22 Arnuntasupakul V, "A randomized trial comparing axillary block versus targeted intracluster injection supraclavicular block for upper limb surgery" 62 : 1287-1294, 2015

      23 Yazer MS, "A randomized comparison between infraclavicular block and targeted intracluster injection supraclavicular block" 40 : 11-15, 2015

      24 Techasuk W, "A randomized comparison between double-injection and targeted intracluster-injection ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block" 118 : 1363-1369, 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼