RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    불확정성을 복원하기 : 니콜라스 로우의 셰익스피어 편집 작업 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76355752

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Nicholas Rowe has been widely acclaimed as the authentic precursor of modem Shakespeare editing. He has shown the first concern to collect and scrutinize all of the previous editions and eradicate the errors committed by them according to some "objective" criteria. In doing this he has established the principles of emendation and collocation which have been regarded as two most important rules of modem editing to this day.
    But we can find strange discrepancy between his declared rules and his own edition. For example, he didn't restore the dramatis personae lists as they really were in various previous editions. He created them in his own style and added them to the works. There are other instances in which we can see his restoring is actually an arbitrarily remaking what he thinks Shakespeare must have written.
    Rowe has also been regarded as the first serious biographer of Shakespeare. No one else before him showed such conscious effort to collect the biographical details of Bard's life. But these details cover only a small portion of Rowe's biography. Across the remaining parts are scattered dubious episodes, rumours, myths and even Rowe's own criticism of the poet's works. In sum, his biography is nothing more than a heap of some interesting, but groundless and fictive episodes. As in editing, what he tried to was to "remake" the poet's life as he thought worthy of the poet's name.
    번역하기

    Nicholas Rowe has been widely acclaimed as the authentic precursor of modem Shakespeare editing. He has shown the first concern to collect and scrutinize all of the previous editions and eradicate the errors committed by them according to some "object...

    Nicholas Rowe has been widely acclaimed as the authentic precursor of modem Shakespeare editing. He has shown the first concern to collect and scrutinize all of the previous editions and eradicate the errors committed by them according to some "objective" criteria. In doing this he has established the principles of emendation and collocation which have been regarded as two most important rules of modem editing to this day.
    But we can find strange discrepancy between his declared rules and his own edition. For example, he didn't restore the dramatis personae lists as they really were in various previous editions. He created them in his own style and added them to the works. There are other instances in which we can see his restoring is actually an arbitrarily remaking what he thinks Shakespeare must have written.
    Rowe has also been regarded as the first serious biographer of Shakespeare. No one else before him showed such conscious effort to collect the biographical details of Bard's life. But these details cover only a small portion of Rowe's biography. Across the remaining parts are scattered dubious episodes, rumours, myths and even Rowe's own criticism of the poet's works. In sum, his biography is nothing more than a heap of some interesting, but groundless and fictive episodes. As in editing, what he tried to was to "remake" the poet's life as he thought worthy of the poet's name.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론: ‘현대적’ 편집자 니콜라스 로우
    • 2. 재구성으로서의 편집 작업
    • 3. 각색으로서의 전기 집필
    • 4. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • 1. 서론: ‘현대적’ 편집자 니콜라스 로우
    • 2. 재구성으로서의 편집 작업
    • 3. 각색으로서의 전기 집필
    • 4. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • 〈Abstract〉
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2018 평가 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
    2017-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-06-11 학회명변경 영문명 : Research Institut for Humanities -> Humanities Research Institute KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.58 0.58 0.54
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.59 0.58 0.86 0.07
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼