RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      투자자와 차입신청자 간 크라우드펀딩 도입 요인의 차이에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Differences of Crowdfunding in the Introduction Factors between Investors and Borrowers

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105051335

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose:
      Since the cost of feed for Korean pig farmers has been increasing, attracting crowdfunding for the swine industry become important. This paper applies the AHP decision-making method to build a model for the sustainable growth of crowdfunding in the swine industry.
      Design/methodology/approch:
      The result from the analysis of data collected from this research shows that both investors and borrows groups consider tangible assets to be most important for crowdfunding in the swine industry.
      Findings:
      Thus protection of investors should be resolved first by providing collateral rather than insisting on the conventional crowdfunding method that stresses the credit aspects only. The investors and borrows groups also judged the loan amount very important, suggesting that the smooth and sufficient investment should be secured for borrows group.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Since the cost of feed for Korean pig farmers has been increasing, attracting crowdfunding for the swine industry become important. This paper applies the AHP decision-making method to build a model for the sustainable growth of crowdfunding...

      Purpose:
      Since the cost of feed for Korean pig farmers has been increasing, attracting crowdfunding for the swine industry become important. This paper applies the AHP decision-making method to build a model for the sustainable growth of crowdfunding in the swine industry.
      Design/methodology/approch:
      The result from the analysis of data collected from this research shows that both investors and borrows groups consider tangible assets to be most important for crowdfunding in the swine industry.
      Findings:
      Thus protection of investors should be resolved first by providing collateral rather than insisting on the conventional crowdfunding method that stresses the credit aspects only. The investors and borrows groups also judged the loan amount very important, suggesting that the smooth and sufficient investment should be secured for borrows group.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김재영, "「크라우드펀딩」을 활용한 건설 산업기술개발 활성화 가능성 검토"

      2 김민경, "한국과 중국의 양돈산업 생산효율성 비교" 한국농식품정책학회 40 (40): 726-748, 2013

      3 박상준, "치솟는 돼지고기 가격…金값된 이유는"

      4 이혜영, "축산 사육-도축-가공-판매 ‘정책 일원화’필요"

      5 김승범, "제주 양돈농가 동산담보대출 활성화대책 필요"

      6 최영찬, "양돈산업 정보화의 현황과 전망" 31 (31): 67-72, 2014

      7 조근태, "앞서가는 리더들의 계층분석적 의사결정" 동현출판사 2003

      8 한국은행 제주본부, "동산담보대출 활성화를통한 축산농가의 자금조달여건 개선 방안" 2015

      9 장순원, "中돼지고기의 유혹…투기판으로 변한콩 시장"

      10 신기림, "中 돼지고기 급등에 사료 사재기…원료 대두박 ‘대박’"

      1 김재영, "「크라우드펀딩」을 활용한 건설 산업기술개발 활성화 가능성 검토"

      2 김민경, "한국과 중국의 양돈산업 생산효율성 비교" 한국농식품정책학회 40 (40): 726-748, 2013

      3 박상준, "치솟는 돼지고기 가격…金값된 이유는"

      4 이혜영, "축산 사육-도축-가공-판매 ‘정책 일원화’필요"

      5 김승범, "제주 양돈농가 동산담보대출 활성화대책 필요"

      6 최영찬, "양돈산업 정보화의 현황과 전망" 31 (31): 67-72, 2014

      7 조근태, "앞서가는 리더들의 계층분석적 의사결정" 동현출판사 2003

      8 한국은행 제주본부, "동산담보대출 활성화를통한 축산농가의 자금조달여건 개선 방안" 2015

      9 장순원, "中돼지고기의 유혹…투기판으로 변한콩 시장"

      10 신기림, "中 돼지고기 급등에 사료 사재기…원료 대두박 ‘대박’"

      11 김경윤, "中 ‘자산버블’ 위태위태…아파트부터돼지사료까지 줄줄이 급등"

      12 Albert, G, "Which Smartphone’s Apps may Contribute to Road Safety? An AHP Model to Evaluate Experts’ Opinions" 50 (50): 54-62, 2016

      13 Saaty, T. L, "What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process" Springer 1988

      14 Mahmoud, M, "Using AHP to Measure the Perception Gap Between Current and Potential Users of Bus Services" 36 (36): 4-23, 2013

      15 Heijden, H. V. D, "User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems" 28 (28): 695-704, 2004

      16 Potzsch, S, "Trust and Trustworthy Computing" Springer 2010

      17 Zhang, T, "Trust Building in Online Peer-To-Peer Lending" 17 (17): 250-266, 2014

      18 Zheng, H, "The Role of Trust Management in Reward-Based Crowdfunding" 40 (40): 97-118, 2016

      19 Zheng, H, "The Role of Multidimensional Social Capital in Crowdfunding: A Comparative Study in China and US" 51 (51): 488-496, 2014

      20 Mollick, E, "The Dynamics of Crowdfunding:An Exploratory Study" 29 (29): 1-16, 2014

      21 Cordova, A, "The Determinants of Crowdfunding Success: Evidence From Technology Projects" 181 (181): 115-124, 2015

      22 Macht, S. A, "The Benefits of Online Crowdfunding for Fund-Seeking Business Ventures" 23 (23): 1-14, 2014

      23 Hsu, Y. L, "The Application of Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP in Lubricant Regenerative Technology Selection" 37 (37): 419-425, 2010

      24 Hobbs, J, "Success in the Management of Crowdfunding Projects in the Creative Industries" 26 (26): 146-166, 2016

      25 Liu, K, "Prioritizing Criteria for Evaluating Cultural Contents in EFL Textbooks through AHP" 7 (7): 841-850, 2016

      26 Hermes, N, "Peer Monitoring, Social Ties and Moral Hazard in Group Ending Programs: Evidence from Eritrea" 33 (33): 149-169, 2005

      27 Wang, H, "Must-Have for Crowd-Funding Project; Credibility" 26 (26): 109-123, 2016

      28 Weiss, G. N. F, "Mitigating Adverse Selection in P2P Lending Empirical Evidence from Prosper.com" University of Bochum 2010

      29 Lin, M, "Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending" 59 (59): 17-35, 2013

      30 Chen, X, "Group Social Capital and Lending Outcomes in the Financial Credit Market: An Empirical Study of Online Peer-To-Peer Lending" 15 (15): 1-13, 2016

      31 Turskis, Z, "Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Assessment of Construction Site Alternatives for Non-Hazardous Waste Incineration Plant in Vilnius City, Applying Aras-F and AHP Methods" 20 (20): 110-120, 2012

      32 Turan, S. S, "Financial Innovation –Crowdfunding: Friend or Foe" 195 (195): 353-362, 2015

      33 이충배, "FTA 환경하에서의 양돈산업 경쟁력 제고 방안에관한 실증연구" 한국관세학회 14 (14): 153-176, 2013

      34 Tot, B, "Evaluation of Key Driver Categories Influencing Sustainable Waste management Development with the Analytic Hierarchy Process[AHP]: Serbia Example" 34 (34): 740-747, 2016

      35 Bodin, L. D, "Evaluating Information Security Investments Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process" 48 (48): 78-83, 2005

      36 Freedman, S, "Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer-to-Peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper.com" University of Indiana 2008

      37 Saaty, T. L, "Decision Making With the Analytic Hierarchy Process" 1 (1): 83-98, 2008

      38 Galuszka, P, "Crowdfunding: A Case Study of a New Model of Financing Music Production" 13 (13): 233-252, 2014

      39 이채린, "Crowdfunding 활성화를 위한 투자자 동기요인 분석 : 후원형(Reward) 플랫폼의 투자자(Funder)를 중심으로" 한국전자거래학회 20 (20): 137-151, 2015

      40 Schwienbacher, A, "Crowdfunding of Small Entrepreneurial Ventures" Oxford University Press 2010

      41 Xu, B, "Configurational Paths to Sponsor Satisfaction in Crowdfunding" 69 (69): 915-927, 2016

      42 Sener, S, "Combining AHP with GIS for Landfill Site Selection: A Case Study in the Lake Beysehir Catchment Area(Konya, Turkey)" 30 (30): 2037-2046, 2010

      43 Vaidya, O. S, "Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications" 169 (169): 1-29, 2006

      44 Asamoah, D, "AHP Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in a Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Firm in Ghana" 7 (7): 49-62, 2012

      45 Falsini, D, "A Logistics Provider Evaluation and Selection Methodology Based on AHP, DEA and Linear Programming Integration" 50 (50): 4822-4829, 2012

      46 "12월 금융개혁 기자간담회,2016. 12. 1"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.19 1.19 1.28
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.31 1.21 1.379 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼