RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 AHCI SCOPUS

      The Dilemma of Korean Conservatism

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104970064

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A paradoxical argument has been made repeatedly with regard to conservatism in Korea: “There is a conservative force, but no conservative philosophy in Korean politics. This is what I would define as the dilemma of Korean conservatism. Thus Koreansboth academic scholars and politicianshave been suffering from a perennial complex, this being the lack of a proper conservative political philosophy. However, this complex is derived from a misguided internalization of West-centrism, a phenomenon that is quite common in many contemporary Third World countries that have been spellbound by West-centrsim. When they consider conservative philosophy, they usually have a Burkean (or British) conservative political philosophy in mind. But the conditions that had led to the formation of such a conservative political philosophy have been utterly lacking in Korea. The fundamental reason for this difference is, of course, derived from the fact that the context of modernization in Korea, like many Third World countries, was radically different from that in England. Thus, I will first try to articulate the three causes for such this difference in the paper: the conservative monopoly of politics and political power, the original contradiction between political and philosophical conservatism, and the heavy dependency of Korean political theories upon outside (Western) sources for their formation and innovation. Thereafter I will suggest two strategies for nourishing philosophical conservatism in order to overcome this dilemma: one outlines a strategy of aligning political conservatism with the support for liberal democracy and the market economy more tightly, and the other is a strategy of taking advantage of traditional cultural resources such as Confucianism.
      번역하기

      A paradoxical argument has been made repeatedly with regard to conservatism in Korea: “There is a conservative force, but no conservative philosophy in Korean politics. This is what I would define as the dilemma of Korean conservatism. Thus Koreansb...

      A paradoxical argument has been made repeatedly with regard to conservatism in Korea: “There is a conservative force, but no conservative philosophy in Korean politics. This is what I would define as the dilemma of Korean conservatism. Thus Koreansboth academic scholars and politicianshave been suffering from a perennial complex, this being the lack of a proper conservative political philosophy. However, this complex is derived from a misguided internalization of West-centrism, a phenomenon that is quite common in many contemporary Third World countries that have been spellbound by West-centrsim. When they consider conservative philosophy, they usually have a Burkean (or British) conservative political philosophy in mind. But the conditions that had led to the formation of such a conservative political philosophy have been utterly lacking in Korea. The fundamental reason for this difference is, of course, derived from the fact that the context of modernization in Korea, like many Third World countries, was radically different from that in England. Thus, I will first try to articulate the three causes for such this difference in the paper: the conservative monopoly of politics and political power, the original contradiction between political and philosophical conservatism, and the heavy dependency of Korean political theories upon outside (Western) sources for their formation and innovation. Thereafter I will suggest two strategies for nourishing philosophical conservatism in order to overcome this dilemma: one outlines a strategy of aligning political conservatism with the support for liberal democracy and the market economy more tightly, and the other is a strategy of taking advantage of traditional cultural resources such as Confucianism.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Yugyojeok jabonjuui-ui ingan jonjung-gwa gongsaengjuui(The Respect of Human Dignity and the Principle of Symbiosis in Confucian Capitalism)" Seoul: Yulwhadang 2 : 1999

      2 "Yugyojeok jabonjuui-ui ingan jonjung-gwa gongsaengjuui(The Respect of Human Dignity and the Principle of Symbiosis in Confucian Capitalism)" Seoul: Yulwhadang 2 : 1999

      3 "The Third Wave" University of the Oklahoma Press 1991

      4 "The Third Wave" University of the Oklahoma Press 1991

      5 "The Society of No Thoughts" 1989

      6 "The Society of No Thoughts" 1989

      7 "The Rhetoric of Reaction" The Belknap Press of Harvard University 1991

      8 "The Rhetoric of Reaction" The Belknap Press of Harvard University 1991

      9 "Seogu bosujuui-ui giwon-gwa baljeon(The Origin and Evolution of Western Conservatism) In Hanguk-ui bosujuui" 1999

      10 "Seogu bosujuui-ui giwon-gwa baljeon(The Origin and Evolution of Western Conservatism) In Hanguk-ui bosujuui" 1999

      1 "Yugyojeok jabonjuui-ui ingan jonjung-gwa gongsaengjuui(The Respect of Human Dignity and the Principle of Symbiosis in Confucian Capitalism)" Seoul: Yulwhadang 2 : 1999

      2 "Yugyojeok jabonjuui-ui ingan jonjung-gwa gongsaengjuui(The Respect of Human Dignity and the Principle of Symbiosis in Confucian Capitalism)" Seoul: Yulwhadang 2 : 1999

      3 "The Third Wave" University of the Oklahoma Press 1991

      4 "The Third Wave" University of the Oklahoma Press 1991

      5 "The Society of No Thoughts" 1989

      6 "The Society of No Thoughts" 1989

      7 "The Rhetoric of Reaction" The Belknap Press of Harvard University 1991

      8 "The Rhetoric of Reaction" The Belknap Press of Harvard University 1991

      9 "Seogu bosujuui-ui giwon-gwa baljeon(The Origin and Evolution of Western Conservatism) In Hanguk-ui bosujuui" 1999

      10 "Seogu bosujuui-ui giwon-gwa baljeon(The Origin and Evolution of Western Conservatism) In Hanguk-ui bosujuui" 1999

      11 "Sasang-ui jeongae-reul tonghae bon hanguk-ui geundae moseup(Korean Modernity Analyzed in Terms of the Evolution of Political Thought) In Hanguk-ui geundae-wa geundaesung bipan (The Critique of Modernization and Modernity in Korea)" Seoul: The Institute of Korean Historical Studies 1996

      12 "Sasang-ui jeongae-reul tonghae bon hanguk-ui geundae moseup(Korean Modernity Analyzed in Terms of the Evolution of Political Thought) In Hanguk-ui geundae-wa geundaesung bipan (The Critique of Modernization and Modernity in Korea)" Seoul: The Institute of Korean Historical Studies 1996

      13 "Political Ideologies in Korean Society Dominant Ideologies of Korean Society edited by the Korean Research Institute for Industrial Societies" (kdu) : 1991

      14 "Political Ideologies in Korean Society Dominant Ideologies of Korean Society edited by the Korean Research Institute for Industrial Societies" (kdu) : 1991

      15 "On the Correlation between the Division and the Social Situation Korean Society in the Age of Division edited by Byeon Hyeong-yun et al" 1985

      16 "On the Correlation between the Division and the Social Situation Korean Society in the Age of Division edited by Byeon Hyeong-yun et al" 1985

      17 "Minju jeongchi-wa hanguk bosujuui-ui wisang(The Position of Korean Conservatism in Democratic Politics) In Hanguk-ui bosujuui (Conservatism in Korea)" Goyang: Ingansarang 1999

      18 "Minju jeongchi-wa hanguk bosujuui-ui wisang(The Position of Korean Conservatism in Democratic Politics) In Hanguk-ui bosujuui (Conservatism in Korea)" Goyang: Ingansarang 1999

      19 "Hangukjeok bosu(Korean-Style Conservatism) In Hanguk-ui bosujuui" 1999

      20 "Hangukjeok bosu(Korean-Style Conservatism) In Hanguk-ui bosujuui" 1999

      21 "Hanguk-ui bosujuui-wa yugyo(Korean Conservatism and Confucianism) In Hanguk-ui bosujuui" 1999

      22 "Hanguk-ui bosujuui-wa yugyo(Korean Conservatism and Confucianism) In Hanguk-ui bosujuui" 1999

      23 "Hanguk-ui bosujuui (Conservatism in Korea)" Goyang: Ingansarang 1999

      24 "Hanguk-ui bosujuui (Conservatism in Korea)" Goyang: Ingansarang 1999

      25 "Democracy in Confucian Societies The Challenge of Justification In Toward Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia edited by Daniel Bell et al" Martin’s Press 1995

      26 "Democracy in Confucian Societies The Challenge of Justification In Toward Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia edited by Daniel Bell et al" Martin’s Press 1995

      27 "Asiajeok gachi-wa jabonjuui: joyuljeok bunhwa-ui seonjinseong(Asian Values and Capitalism: Coordinated Differentiation and Its Edge), Cheolhak yeongu (Philosophical Review)" 1999

      28 "Asiajeok gachi-wa jabonjuui: joyuljeok bunhwa-ui seonjinseong(Asian Values and Capitalism: Coordinated Differentiation and Its Edge), Cheolhak yeongu (Philosophical Review)" 1999

      29 "2 of Marxism" 1972

      30 "2 of Marxism" 1972

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2018-11-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      2017-03-07 학회명변경 영문명 : The Academy of Korean -> The Academy of Korean Studies KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 A&HCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.1 0.24
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.2 0.394 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼