The Chinese dynasties, such as the Khitan Liao(遼) or the Mandarin Sung(宋), all bestowed clothes and uniforms to the Goryeo kings. This particular act was intended to highlight the fact that the Goryeo king was a “local lord” who was to serve t...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104850843
이종서 (울산대학교)
2012
Korean
attires ; color of the clothes ; emperor ; lords ; self-consciousness ; features of the state ; 복식 ; 복색 ; 황제 ; 제후 ; 자의식 ; 국가위상
KCI등재
학술저널
37-63(27쪽)
10
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The Chinese dynasties, such as the Khitan Liao(遼) or the Mandarin Sung(宋), all bestowed clothes and uniforms to the Goryeo kings. This particular act was intended to highlight the fact that the Goryeo king was a “local lord” who was to serve t...
The Chinese dynasties, such as the Khitan Liao(遼) or the Mandarin Sung(宋), all bestowed clothes and uniforms to the Goryeo kings. This particular act was intended to highlight the fact that the Goryeo king was a “local lord” who was to serve the Chinese emperor. But in the early half period of the Goryeo dynasty, the Goryeo kings actually wore a ‘different’ uniform which was designed as a dress for the ‘emperor’ when they were working with the officials or holding domestic events. They only wore the 'lord' uniform bestowed from China when they had to greet Chinese emissaries or attended installation ceremonies arranged by the Chinese emperor. The Goryeo kings accepted their position as a lord serving China, but at the same time maintained an internal and independent set of institutions which was not that much different from the Chinese system.
Yet the dresses and uniforms of the early half of the Goryeo dynasty period did not continue into the latter half of the same dynasty. With the oppression and intervention from the Mongol Yuan empire, the kings had to abandon the traditional yellow attire, and instead chose to wear the ‘purple’ attire. By doing so they positioned themselves as lords (serving the emperor), and such status continued into the Joseon dynasty. The late Goryeo and early Joseon people accepted the world order with China at the center, and modified the Korean peninsula’s status according to that. Such action signals a fairly weakened state of the people’s independent nature and independent thinking. Then again, unlike the other descendant kings who followed in subsequent periods, the portrait of the Joseon Founder King Taejo (Yi Seong-gye) shows the king wearing a 'Blue' uniform. Such description indicates the existence of a strong self-consciousness in the minds of the Joseon people, who must have wanted to maintain independence and autonomous thinking as residents of a country placed in the East side of China.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The Chinese dynasties, such as the Khitan Liao(遼) or the Mandarin Sung(宋), all bestowed clothes and uniforms to the Goryeo kings. This particular act was intended to highlight the fact that the Goryeo king was a “local lord” who was to serve t...
The Chinese dynasties, such as the Khitan Liao(遼) or the Mandarin Sung(宋), all bestowed clothes and uniforms to the Goryeo kings. This particular act was intended to highlight the fact that the Goryeo king was a “local lord” who was to serve the Chinese emperor. But in the early half period of the Goryeo dynasty, the Goryeo kings actually wore a ‘different’ uniform which was designed as a dress for the ‘emperor’ when they were working with the officials or holding domestic events. They only wore the 'lord' uniform bestowed from China when they had to greet Chinese emissaries or attended installation ceremonies arranged by the Chinese emperor. The Goryeo kings accepted their position as a lord serving China, but at the same time maintained an internal and independent set of institutions which was not that much different from the Chinese system.
Yet the dresses and uniforms of the early half of the Goryeo dynasty period did not continue into the latter half of the same dynasty. With the oppression and intervention from the Mongol Yuan empire, the kings had to abandon the traditional yellow attire, and instead chose to wear the ‘purple’ attire. By doing so they positioned themselves as lords (serving the emperor), and such status continued into the Joseon dynasty. The late Goryeo and early Joseon people accepted the world order with China at the center, and modified the Korean peninsula’s status according to that. Such action signals a fairly weakened state of the people’s independent nature and independent thinking. Then again, unlike the other descendant kings who followed in subsequent periods, the portrait of the Joseon Founder King Taejo (Yi Seong-gye) shows the king wearing a 'Blue' uniform. Such description indicates the existence of a strong self-consciousness in the minds of the Joseon people, who must have wanted to maintain independence and autonomous thinking as residents of a country placed in the East side of China.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 임명미, "한국의 복식문화Ⅰ" 도서출판 경춘사 1997
2 "조선왕조실록"
3 이경자, "우리 옷의 전통 양식" 이화여자대학교 출판부 2003
4 한영우, "왕조의 설계자 정도전" 지식산업사 212-215, 1999
5 조선미, "왕의 얼굴" 사회평론 32-34, 2012
6 "숙종실록"
7 노명호, "고려태조 왕건 동상의 유전과 문화적 배경" 서울대 국사학과 50 : 2011
8 노명호, "고려시대의 다원적 천하관과 해동천자" 한국사연구회 105 : 27-36, 1999
9 노명호, "고려시대의 다원적 천하관과 해동천자" 한국사연구회 105 : 1999
10 "고려사"
1 임명미, "한국의 복식문화Ⅰ" 도서출판 경춘사 1997
2 "조선왕조실록"
3 이경자, "우리 옷의 전통 양식" 이화여자대학교 출판부 2003
4 한영우, "왕조의 설계자 정도전" 지식산업사 212-215, 1999
5 조선미, "왕의 얼굴" 사회평론 32-34, 2012
6 "숙종실록"
7 노명호, "고려태조 왕건 동상의 유전과 문화적 배경" 서울대 국사학과 50 : 2011
8 노명호, "고려시대의 다원적 천하관과 해동천자" 한국사연구회 105 : 27-36, 1999
9 노명호, "고려시대의 다원적 천하관과 해동천자" 한국사연구회 105 : 1999
10 "고려사"
11 노명호, "고려 태조 왕건의 동상" 지식산업사 2011
12 이민정, "고려 초기 태묘 제례복식 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2002
13 노명호, "고려 국가와 집단의식" 서울대학교출판문화원 125-, 2009
14 유희경, "개정판 한국복식문화사" 교문사 2006
15 유희경, "개정판 한국복식문화사" 교문사 120-, 1998
16 "高麗史"
17 "漢籍電子文獻"
18 "新校本舊唐書"
19 "新校本舊唐書"
20 "新校本明史"
21 "新校本宋史"
22 "帝王韻紀"
23 "宣和奉使高麗圖經"
24 "宣化奉使高麗圖經"
25 "太祖實錄"
26 "太宗實錄"
27 "世宗實錄"
28 "三國史記"
29 "http://www.tsm3.or.kr"
한․일공학 중등학교 졸업생의 일제하 진로와 해방후 변화 : 충남 강경상업학교의 사례
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2006-05-23 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국문화연구소 -> 규장각한국학연구원영문명 : Institute of Korean Studies -> Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies | ![]() |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.82 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.85 | 0.85 | 2.07 | 0.37 |