공법상 소송유형과 소송형식 = 항고소송과 당사자소송을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Whereas administrative organs can require payments of individuals, individuals can, vise versa, claim to state monetary compensation, e.g. claims for overpaid or wrongly paid taxes or quasi-taxes, claims for damages due to illegal use of administrative power, or claims for compensation despite legal use of power. Individuals can also enjoy special rights stemmed from statutes regarding social security. Individuals are to make choice of the type of proceedings, pursuant to the nature of cases, between administrative litigation proceedings - which covers both cancellation proceedings and party proceedings - and civil proceedings. An administrative act performed by an administrative organ can theoretically be classified as either an act of public authority, which can be reviewed through cancellation proceedings, or an act without authority, which can be dealt in party proceedings, but aforementioned classification is sometimes not appropriate because of the ambiguity of the nature of an administrative act. This ambiguity raises a question whether cancellation proceedings and party proceedings can be tried in one batch. It seems feasible for a plaintiff to apply for cancellation proceedings against administrative organ and to apply for party proceedings against state at the same time in identical case, in which court can first order cancellation of the administrative act and then payment to the plaintiff. With regard to administrative litigation proceedings, the most significant criteria to differentiate cancellation proceedings and party proceedings is the way how the right of plaintiff arises. When the specific right of plaintiff does not derive from a statute itself but from the specific administrative act of administrative organ, i.e. full or partly admission of a right, and an administrative organ rejects the admission of the right, the plaintiff can demand the rejection be cancelled through cancellation proceedings. In contrast, when a specific right of plaintiff can be construed directly from a statute, regardless of an administrative act, the plaintiff is obliged to take party proceedings against the state circumventing administrative organ. Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Korea regards the nature of claims for overpaid or wrongly paid taxes and claims for damages against state as private ones, which would mean that the proceedings for both claims should be civil proceedings. However, since the grounds for both claims are either void or invalid impose of taxes or illegal use of administrative power and the claims started from the territory of public law, the claims are to be tried under party proceedings. Numerous statutes provide for the claims for compensation from state despite legal use of its power, general statute governing principle of the claims is not enacted. As a result, the processes of compensation or procedure of litigation of each separate claims for compensation must be dealt with case-by-case base. The judgments of the Supreme Court can be a good reference, with a distinct limitation that the amendment of statutes is a frequent event and that the structure of each claims for compensation is altered often. It is necessary to great extent to scrutinize statutes before applying judgments to any specific case.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 공법상 소송 형태에 관한 입법례
• Ⅲ. 공법상 소송 형태에 관한 한국 행정소송법의 입장과 전망
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 고종주, "행정주체에 대한 금전급부청구권의 행사방법" 부산판례연구회 12 : 2001

2 "행정소송법 개정자료집"

3 안철상, "행정소송Ⅰ" 한국사법행정학회 2008

4 박균성, "행정법론(상)" 박영사 2008

5 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2008

6 박정훈, "항고소송과 당사자소송의 관계"

7 신동윤, "하천법상의 하천구역과 손실보상" 34 : 2002

8 박윤흔, "최신행정법강의(상)" 박영사 2009

9 이상경, "조세소송과 전심절차" 60 :

10 임영호, "신 하천법상의 지방2급하천과 손실보상" 대한변호사협회 (290) : 2000

11 임영호, "민주화운동관련자 명예회복 및 보상 등에 관한 법률'에 따른 보상금 등의 지급을 구하는 소송의 형태" 법원도서관 (76) : 2008

12 이현수, "민주화보상법상 금전적 구제의 법적 성격 ―보상심의위원회의 심의결정의 법적 성격 및 이에 대한 소송유형을 중심으로―" 한국공법학회 34 (34): 199-231, 2005

13 정하중, "대법원판례의 어업보상에 대한 소고" 서강대학교 법학연구소 4 : 2002

14 최형기, "과오납금환급청구소송의 성격" 60 :

15 하명호, "공법상 당사자소송과 민사소송의 구별과 소송상 취급" 대한변호사협회 (380) : 52-72, 2008

16 原田尙彦, "行政法要論" 学陽書房 2004

17 塩野宏, "行政法Ⅰ" 有斐閣 2005

18 조한중, ""수산업법 소정의 손실보상청구권의 법적 성질 및 그 행사방법" in 특별법연구" 박영사 1997

19 조해현, ""민주화운동관련자명예회복및보상등에관한법률에 기한 행정소송의 형태" in 행정판례연구" 박영사 2006

20 하명호, ""1984.12.31. 전에 하천구역으로 편입된 토지에 대한 손실보상청구의 소송형태" in 특별법연구" 박영사 2006