RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      탈중앙화된 자율 조직 의사결정을 위한 도구 = A Decision Making Tool for Decentralized Autonomous Organization

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106931989

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Blockchain enabled Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), a new form of organization with conveying its core value – trust. Token holders who are participating DAO’s governance share their thoughts, information, and ideas in online forum. But it is problem that chronological form of DAO’s online forum makes token holders hard to find crucial information, meaning that many of them might not understand what is happening discussion. In this paper, we studied not only a decision making process which feature is iteration, visualization, and applicable to DAO with 6 steps in total but also a decision making tool which is based on the process of this paper. The tool has features to help participants such as voting model, visualization features which gives guidance to them for their decision during the process. Our experiment showed that the process and tool is somewhat reasonable, and the information during the process is effective for participants. This work is expected to be applied to current DAOs to make a decision among the token holders.
      번역하기

      Blockchain enabled Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), a new form of organization with conveying its core value – trust. Token holders who are participating DAO’s governance share their thoughts, information, and ideas in online forum. Bu...

      Blockchain enabled Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), a new form of organization with conveying its core value – trust. Token holders who are participating DAO’s governance share their thoughts, information, and ideas in online forum. But it is problem that chronological form of DAO’s online forum makes token holders hard to find crucial information, meaning that many of them might not understand what is happening discussion. In this paper, we studied not only a decision making process which feature is iteration, visualization, and applicable to DAO with 6 steps in total but also a decision making tool which is based on the process of this paper. The tool has features to help participants such as voting model, visualization features which gives guidance to them for their decision during the process. Our experiment showed that the process and tool is somewhat reasonable, and the information during the process is effective for participants. This work is expected to be applied to current DAOs to make a decision among the token holders.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최동빈, "머신러닝을 이용한 세금 계정과목 분류" 한국반도체디스플레이기술학회 18 (18): 73-77, 2019

      2 SAATY, Thomas L., "The analytic hierarchy process" Springer 59-67, 1989

      3 PARK, Jung-Won, "Supporting distributed collaborative prioritization for WinWin requirements capture and negotiations" 578-584, 1999

      4 PARK, Jung-Won, "Supporting distributed collaborative prioritization" IEEE 560-563, 1999

      5 BUDER, Jürgen, "Selective reading of large online forum discussions: The impact of rating visualizations on navigation and learning" 44 : 191-201, 2015

      6 NAKAMOTO, "Satoshi. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system"

      7 VAN DE, Andrew, "Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision-making effectiveness" 14 (14): 203-212, 1971

      8 DISALVO, Carl, "Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern" ACM 2397-2406, 2014

      9 "MakerDAO whitepaper"

      10 HERRING, Susan C., "Interactional coherence in CMC" IEEE 13-, 1999

      1 최동빈, "머신러닝을 이용한 세금 계정과목 분류" 한국반도체디스플레이기술학회 18 (18): 73-77, 2019

      2 SAATY, Thomas L., "The analytic hierarchy process" Springer 59-67, 1989

      3 PARK, Jung-Won, "Supporting distributed collaborative prioritization for WinWin requirements capture and negotiations" 578-584, 1999

      4 PARK, Jung-Won, "Supporting distributed collaborative prioritization" IEEE 560-563, 1999

      5 BUDER, Jürgen, "Selective reading of large online forum discussions: The impact of rating visualizations on navigation and learning" 44 : 191-201, 2015

      6 NAKAMOTO, "Satoshi. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system"

      7 VAN DE, Andrew, "Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision-making effectiveness" 14 (14): 203-212, 1971

      8 DISALVO, Carl, "Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern" ACM 2397-2406, 2014

      9 "MakerDAO whitepaper"

      10 HERRING, Susan C., "Interactional coherence in CMC" IEEE 13-, 1999

      11 SHIRANI, Ashraf, "Group decision support systems and incentive structures" 33 (33): 231-240, 1998

      12 PUTHAL, Deepak, "Everything you wanted to know about the blockchain: Its promise, components, processes, and problems" 7 (7): 6-14, 2018

      13 "DigixDAO whitepaper"

      14 "DigixDAO governance guide"

      15 SAATY, Thomas L., "Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process" 1 (1): 83-98, 2008

      16 BROWN, Richard Gendal, "Corda: an introduction" 1 : 15-, 2016

      17 DUPONT, Quinn, "Bitcoin and Beyond (Open Access)" Routledge 157-177, 2017

      18 CACHIN, Christian, "Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric" 4-, 2016

      19 SAATY, Thomas L., "Analytic network process" Springer US 2013

      20 PALOMARES, Ivan, "A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making" 22 (22): 516-530, 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-03-25 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국반도체및디스플레이장비학회 -> 한국반도체디스플레이기술학회
      영문명 : The Korean Society of Semiconductor & Display Equipment Technology -> The Korean Society of Semiconductor & Display Technology
      KCI등재
      2010-03-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 반도체및디스플레이장비학회지 -> 반도체디스플레이기술학회지
      외국어명 : Journal of the Semiconductor and Display Equipment Technology -> Journal of the Semiconductor & Display Technology
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.29 0.29 0.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.21 0.18 0.217 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼