RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      제4차 산업혁명에 따른 사회경제적 변화와 기본소득의 윤리적 가치 및 경제적 합리성에 대한 정책적 재론 = The 4th Industrial Revolution of Socio-economic Changes and the Policy Reargument of the Basic Income's Ethical Value and Economic Rationality

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105319937

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In recent years, it has been a prevailing factor in the economic, industrial and social aspects that is the digital transformation or the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR). On the one hand, potential future key technologies are anticipated the change of human living environment and on the other hand, job losses and a further de-industrialization and socioeconomic changes are concerned. The current debate on the 4IR is a reflection of employees regarding ergonomics, integration and collaboration with technologies. This technological change will cause changes in work demands and more importantly, the substitution of new technologies, such as automations, for human resources. In order to take account of transforming socioeconomic changes led by the 4IR, the introduction of basic income is proposed as an alternative solution to such the changes. However, as its main characteristics of nondiscriminatory and unconditional provision of incomes for all, the basic income has been brought deeply divided arguments, particularly in the ethical value and economic rationality. The study focuses on the reargument over the ethical value and economic rationality of the basic income in the socioeconomic changes led by the 4IR.
      번역하기

      In recent years, it has been a prevailing factor in the economic, industrial and social aspects that is the digital transformation or the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR). On the one hand, potential future key technologies are anticipated the change of...

      In recent years, it has been a prevailing factor in the economic, industrial and social aspects that is the digital transformation or the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR). On the one hand, potential future key technologies are anticipated the change of human living environment and on the other hand, job losses and a further de-industrialization and socioeconomic changes are concerned. The current debate on the 4IR is a reflection of employees regarding ergonomics, integration and collaboration with technologies. This technological change will cause changes in work demands and more importantly, the substitution of new technologies, such as automations, for human resources. In order to take account of transforming socioeconomic changes led by the 4IR, the introduction of basic income is proposed as an alternative solution to such the changes. However, as its main characteristics of nondiscriminatory and unconditional provision of incomes for all, the basic income has been brought deeply divided arguments, particularly in the ethical value and economic rationality. The study focuses on the reargument over the ethical value and economic rationality of the basic income in the socioeconomic changes led by the 4IR.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Meyer, D., "Why Adidas is Turning to Robots in Germany and the U.S" Fortune

      2 Dworkin, R., "What is Equality? Part II: Equality of Resources" 10 : 283-345, 1981

      3 World Bank, "The world development report 2016: digital dividends" World Bank Group 2016

      4 Quartz, "The robot that takes your job should pay taxes, says Bill Gates" Quartz

      5 De Wispelaere, J., "The Struggle for Strategy: On the Politics of the Basic Income Proposal" 36 (36): 131-141, 2016

      6 Deloitte, "The State of the State 2016-17: Brexit and the business of government, UK Public Sector"

      7 Ackerman, B, "The Stakeholder Society" Yale University Press 1999

      8 van Donselaar, G., "The Right to Exploit: Parasitism, Scarcity, Basic Income" Oxford University Press 2009

      9 Credit Suisse Research Institute, "The Global Wealth Report 2015" Credit Suisse Research Institute 2015

      10 World Economic Forum, "The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution" Global Challenge Insight Report by World Economic Forum 2016

      1 Meyer, D., "Why Adidas is Turning to Robots in Germany and the U.S" Fortune

      2 Dworkin, R., "What is Equality? Part II: Equality of Resources" 10 : 283-345, 1981

      3 World Bank, "The world development report 2016: digital dividends" World Bank Group 2016

      4 Quartz, "The robot that takes your job should pay taxes, says Bill Gates" Quartz

      5 De Wispelaere, J., "The Struggle for Strategy: On the Politics of the Basic Income Proposal" 36 (36): 131-141, 2016

      6 Deloitte, "The State of the State 2016-17: Brexit and the business of government, UK Public Sector"

      7 Ackerman, B, "The Stakeholder Society" Yale University Press 1999

      8 van Donselaar, G., "The Right to Exploit: Parasitism, Scarcity, Basic Income" Oxford University Press 2009

      9 Credit Suisse Research Institute, "The Global Wealth Report 2015" Credit Suisse Research Institute 2015

      10 World Economic Forum, "The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution" Global Challenge Insight Report by World Economic Forum 2016

      11 Schwab, K, "The Fourth Industrial Revolution" Crown Business 2016

      12 Dworkin, R., "Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality" Harvard University Press 2000

      13 Birnbaum, S., "Should surfers be ostracized? Basic income, liberal neutrality, and the work ethos, Politics" 10 (10): 396-419, 2011

      14 Roemer, J. E., "Second Thoughts on Property Relation and Exploitation" 15 : 257-266, 1989

      15 van Parijs, P., "Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism?" Clarendon Press 1995

      16 Paine, T., "Political Writings" Cambridge University Press 1997

      17 van Parijs, P., "Political Ecology: From Autonomous Sphere to Basic Income" 4 (4): 1-9, 2009

      18 Washington Post, "Picking on robots won't deal with job destruction" Washington Post Opinions

      19 Dombrowski, U., "Mental strain as field of action in the 4th industrial revolution, Variety Management in Manufacturing" 17 : 100-105, 2014

      20 Business Insider, "Mark Cuban calls universal basic income 'one of the worst possible responses' to robot automation"

      21 White, S., "Liberal Equality, Exploitation, and the Case for an Unconditional Basic Income" XLV : 312-326, 1997

      22 Rawls, J. ., "Justice as Fairness: A Restatement" Harvard University Press 2001

      23 De Wispelaere, J., "Is there (or should there be) a right to basic income?" 42 (42): 920-936, 2016

      24 Neugebauer, R., "Industrie 4.0- From the perspective of applied research" 57 : 2-7, 2016

      25 United Bank of Switzerland, "Extreme automation and connectivity: The global, regional, and investment implications of the Fourth Industrial Revolution" 2016

      26 Futurism, "Elon Musk: Automation will Force Government to Introduce Universal Basic Income"

      27 McKinsey Global Institute, "Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy" McKinsey & Company

      28 Standing, G, "Beyond the New Paternalism: Basic Security as Equality" Verso 2002

      29 van Parijs, P., "Basic Income: A Simple and Powerful Idea for the Twenty-First Century" 32 (32): 7-39, 2004

      30 Baker, J., "Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform" Verso 1992

      31 Oxfam, "An Economy For the 1%: How privilege and power in the economy drive extreme inequality and how this can be stopped"

      32 Friedman, M., "A Theory of the Consumption Function" Princeton University Press 1957

      33 Rawls, J., "A Theory of Justice" Harvard University Press 1971

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.85 0.85 0.98
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.01 1.01 1.111 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼