RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    동물권 담론의 해체 - 법미학적·정신분석학적 성찰 - = Deconstructing of Animal Rights Discourse- Legal Aesthetic and Psychoanalytic Reflections -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109962683

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Animal discourse, which envisions a "new justice for animals," should not mimic modern human rights concepts. But rather it should critically reflect on and deconstruct modernity and be reconstructed within a postmodern context. Therefore, this article sequentially deconstructs animal discourse from legal aesthetics and psychoanalysis perspectives.
    First, legal aesthetics enables a way of thinking that decenters law, arguing that justice must be constructed not only on rational and ethical dimensions but also on aesthetic ones. By examining the images represented in animal discourse from a legal aesthetic perspective, we can critically deconstruct the modernity underlying animal discourse. Second, psychoanalysis distances itself from modernity, which has limited humans to conscious and rational beings, and focuses on the human unconscious. This applies beyond the individual to social structures, and analyzing animal discourse through this allows us to more clearly reveal its structural limitations.
    Currently, animal images often repeat the existing human-animal dichotomy and reproduce anthropocentric thinking, rather than fostering a shift in values ​​through ‘new’ aesthetic experiences. In particular, animal images reflect and reproduce key arguments of animal rights while simultaneously reinforcing them. This leads to animal discourse adopting a dichotomous structure of ‘protection and abuse’. From a psychoanalytic perspective, this risks inadvertently turning participants into ‘neurotic’ subjects, as the practice of ‘animal protection’ connects with the superego.
    Ultimately, despite unprecedented participation and interest, the current structure of animal discourse, with its ‘rights-centered’ and ‘protection/abuse’ dichotomies, makes it difficult to ensure an end to animal abuse and exploitation, or even a healthy coexistence between humans and animals. If animal discourse truly dreams of a “new justice for animals,” it must move beyond the moral and normative control of human behavior through law, dismantling anthropocentric thinking and moving toward a “Animal Turn” where humans and animals can be revealed as mutually relevant subjects.
    번역하기

    Animal discourse, which envisions a "new justice for animals," should not mimic modern human rights concepts. But rather it should critically reflect on and deconstruct modernity and be reconstructed within a postmodern context. Therefore, this articl...

    Animal discourse, which envisions a "new justice for animals," should not mimic modern human rights concepts. But rather it should critically reflect on and deconstruct modernity and be reconstructed within a postmodern context. Therefore, this article sequentially deconstructs animal discourse from legal aesthetics and psychoanalysis perspectives.
    First, legal aesthetics enables a way of thinking that decenters law, arguing that justice must be constructed not only on rational and ethical dimensions but also on aesthetic ones. By examining the images represented in animal discourse from a legal aesthetic perspective, we can critically deconstruct the modernity underlying animal discourse. Second, psychoanalysis distances itself from modernity, which has limited humans to conscious and rational beings, and focuses on the human unconscious. This applies beyond the individual to social structures, and analyzing animal discourse through this allows us to more clearly reveal its structural limitations.
    Currently, animal images often repeat the existing human-animal dichotomy and reproduce anthropocentric thinking, rather than fostering a shift in values ​​through ‘new’ aesthetic experiences. In particular, animal images reflect and reproduce key arguments of animal rights while simultaneously reinforcing them. This leads to animal discourse adopting a dichotomous structure of ‘protection and abuse’. From a psychoanalytic perspective, this risks inadvertently turning participants into ‘neurotic’ subjects, as the practice of ‘animal protection’ connects with the superego.
    Ultimately, despite unprecedented participation and interest, the current structure of animal discourse, with its ‘rights-centered’ and ‘protection/abuse’ dichotomies, makes it difficult to ensure an end to animal abuse and exploitation, or even a healthy coexistence between humans and animals. If animal discourse truly dreams of a “new justice for animals,” it must move beyond the moral and normative control of human behavior through law, dismantling anthropocentric thinking and moving toward a “Animal Turn” where humans and animals can be revealed as mutually relevant subjects.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼