How Do the More Recent Reconstruction Algorithms Affect the Interpretation Criteria of PET/CT Images?

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose Recently, a new Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) Reconstruction Algorithm was introduced by GE Healthcare, Q.Clear; it promises to provide better PET image resolution compared to the widely used Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM). The aimof this study is to compare the performance of these two algorithms on several types of findings, in terms of image quality, lesion detectability, sensitivity, and specificity.
Methods Between September 6th 2017 and July 31st 2018, 663 whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed at the Nuclear Medicine Department of S. Martino Hospital (Belluno, Italy). Based on the availability of clinical/radiological follow-up data, 240 scans were retrospectively reviewed. For each scan, a hypermetabolic finding was selected, reporting both for OSEM and Q.Clear: SUVmax and SUVmean values of the finding, the liver and the background close to the finding; size of the finding; percentage variations of SUVmax and SUVmean. Each finding was subsequently correlated with clinical and radiological follow-up, to define its benign/malignant nature.
Results Overall, Q.Clear improved the SUVvalues in each scan, especially in small findings (< 10mm), high SUVmax values (≥ 10), and medium/low backgrounds. Furthermore, Q.Clear amplifies the signal of hypermetabolic findings without modifying the background signal, which leads to an increase in signal-to-noise ratio, improving overall image quality. Finally, Q.Clear did not affect PET sensitivity or specificity, in terms of number of reported findings and characterization of their nature.
Conclusions Q.Clear is an iterative algorithm that improves significantly the quality of PET images compared to OSEM, increasing the SUVmax of findings (in particular for small findings) and the signal-to-noise ratio. However, due to the intrinsic characteristics of this algorithm, it will be necessary to adapt and/or modify the current interpretative criteria based of quantitative evaluation, to avoid an overestimation of the disease burden.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 A. Iriarte, "System models for PET statistical iterative reconstruction: A review" Elsevier BV 48 : 30-48, 2016

2 Cheson BD, "Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma : the Lugano classification" 32 : 3059-3068, 2014

3 Vandenberghe S, "Recent developments in time-of-flight PET" 3 : 3-, 2016

4 Slomka PJ, "Recent advances and future Progress in PET instrumentation" 46 : 5-19, 2016

5 Ter Voert EEGW, "Quantitative performance and optimal regularization parameter in block sequential regularized expectation maximization recontructions in clinical 68Ga-PSMA PET/MR" 8 : 70-, 2018

6 Ahn S, "Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET" 60 : 5733-5751, 2015

7 Van der Vos CS, "Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET" 44 : 4-16, 2017

8 Reynés-Llompart G, "Phantom, clinical, and texture indices evaluation and optimization of a penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method (Q.Clear) on a BGO PET/CT scanner" 45 : 3214-3222, 2018

9 Reynés-Llompart G, "Phantom, clinical, and texture indices evaluation and optimization of a penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method (Q.Clear) on a BGO PET/CT scanner" 45 : 3214-3222, 2018

10 Teoh EJ, "Phantom and clinical evaluation of the Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT system" 56 : 1447-1452, 2015

11 GE Healthcare, "PET/CT Millennium specifics"

12 Tarantola G, "PET Instrumentation and Reconstuction Algorthms in whole-body applications" 44 : 756-769, 2003

13 Rowley LM, "Optimization of image reconstruction for 90Y selective internal radiotherapy on a lutetium yttrium Orthosilicate PET/CT system using a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm" 58 : 658-664, 2017

14 Teoh EJ, "Novel penalised likelihood reconstruction of PET in the assessment of histologically verified small pulmonary nodules" 26 : 576-584, 2016

15 Eric Berg, "Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography" Elsevier BV 48 (48): 311-331, 2018

16 Volterrani D, "Fondamenti di medicina nucleare. Tecniche e Applicazioni" Springer Verlag 2010

17 Barrington SF, "FDG PET for therapy monitoring in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas" 44 : 97-110, 2017

18 Chilcott AK, "Effect of a Bayesian penalized likelihood PET reconstruction compared with ordered subset expectation maximization on clinical image quality over a wide range of patient weights" 210 : 153-157, 2018

19 O’ Doherty J, "Effect of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction on [13N]-NH3 rest perfusion quantification" 24 : 282-290, 2016

20 Parvizi N, "Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDGPET-CTimprove signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?" 84 : 1873-1878, 2015

21 Howard BA, "Comparison of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction versus OS-EM for characterization of small pulmonary nodules in oncologic PET/CT" 31 : 623-628, 2017

22 Teoh EJ, "Clear on an LYSO PET/CT system" 56 : 1447-1452, 2015

23 Teoh EJ, "Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) of 18F-fluciclovine PET for imaging of recurrent prostate cancer: semi-quantitative and clinical evaluation" 91 : 20170727-, 2018

24 Surti S, "Advances in time-of-flight PET" 32 : 12-22, 2016

25 Vallot D, "A clinical evaluation of the impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on PET FDG metrics" 38 : 979-984, 2017

26 Teoh EJ, "18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of histopathologically confirmed mediastinal lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer using a penalised likelihood reconstruction" 26 : 4098-5006, 2016