국내 마취과의사의 간행윤리 의식 분석 = A Questionnaire Survey of Domestic Anesthesiologists for the Ethics in Publishing

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The importance of publication ethics has recently been emphasized.Therefore, inquiries regarding dual publications were analyzed to obtain basic data on whether domestic anesthetists recognized its importance and understood its practicalities.
Methods:The data for the questionnaire was collected from doctors who participated in a review workshop with full consent. A total of 15 questions were classified into 3 categories:a general interest regarding the ethics of publication, personal objective opinions and reactivity toward an illegal act in this regard.
Results:Thirty-eight participants responded spontaneously to the questionnaire.Thirty-six participants were aware of the principle of dual publications and 35 participants were aware of the contents in the home page.Twenty participants had contact with lectures or other media related to redundant publishing.Fourteen participants answered ‘yes’ regarding their colleague in an illegal action.However, 25 participants said that they were prepared to report an illegal act to the department or society.Only 5 participants tried to take into consideration ethical issues of dual publication while 15 participants were tempted regarding dual publication while writing a paper.Twenty-seven participants agreed with the principle of duplicate or illegal publication.Thirty participants were prepared to have a consistent attitude toward any individual that committed a violation against publication ethics.Nineteen participants worried about the possibility of exposure of an illegal publication.
Conclusions: According to the development of a watch system, dual publication can easily be detected. Regular education regarding publication ethics and notification to members to prevent an illegal act is necessary.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The importance of publication ethics has recently been emphasized.Therefore, inquiries regarding dual publications were analyzed to obtain basic data on whether domestic anesthetists recognized its importance and understood its practicalities.
Methods:The data for the questionnaire was collected from doctors who participated in a review workshop with full consent. A total of 15 questions were classified into 3 categories:a general interest regarding the ethics of publication, personal objective opinions and reactivity toward an illegal act in this regard.
Results:Thirty-eight participants responded spontaneously to the questionnaire.Thirty-six participants were aware of the principle of dual publications and 35 participants were aware of the contents in the home page.Twenty participants had contact with lectures or other media related to redundant publishing.Fourteen participants answered ‘yes’ regarding their colleague in an illegal action.However, 25 participants said that they were prepared to report an illegal act to the department or society.Only 5 participants tried to take into consideration ethical issues of dual publication while 15 participants were tempted regarding dual publication while writing a paper.Twenty-seven participants agreed with the principle of duplicate or illegal publication.Thirty participants were prepared to have a consistent attitude toward any individual that committed a violation against publication ethics.Nineteen participants worried about the possibility of exposure of an illegal publication.
Conclusions: According to the development of a watch system, dual publication can easily be detected. Regular education regarding publication ethics and notification to members to prevent an illegal act is necessary.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, "Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals" 126 : 36-47, 1997

2 Self DJ, "Teaching medical ethics to first-year students by using film discussion to develop their moral reasoning" 68 : 383-385, 1993

3 Marshall E, "San Diego's tough stand on research fraud" 234 : 534-535, 1986

4 Schein M, "Redundant surgical publications: tip of the iceberg?" 129 : 655-661, 2001

5 Huston P, "Redundancy, disaggregation, and the integrity of medical research" 347 : 1024-1026, 1996

6 Relman AS, "Lessons from the Darsee affair" 308 : 1415-1417, 1983

7 Rogers LF, "In any language" 174 : 1487-, 2000

8 Tramer MR, "Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study" 315 : 635-640, 1997

9 Committee On Publication Ethics (COPE), "Guidelines on good publication practice" 163 : 249-252, 2000

10 Smith G, "Ethics in publishing" 66 : 421-422, 1991

11 Moffic HS, "Ethics education for psychiatry" 2 : 161-166, 1991

12 Rogers LF, "Duplicate publication or not? Case 2" 174 : 1790-1791, 2000

13 Rogers LF, "Duplicate publication or not?" 174 : 1789-1790, 2000

14 Bailey BJ, "Duplicate publication in the field of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery" 126 : 211-216, 2002

15 Hanke CW, "Dual publication and manipulation of the editorial process" 182 : 250-251, 1991

16 White BD, "Clinical ethics training for staff physicians: designing and evaluating a model program" 4 : 229-235, 1993

17 Rennie D, "Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin" 271 : 469-471, 1994

18 Sulmasy DP, "A randomized trial of ethics education for medical house officers" 19 : 157-163, 1993