RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      성인 여성의 만성 발목 불안정성 유무에 따른 한발 전방 점프 착지 시 동적 자세 조절 능력 차이 분석 = Differences in Dynamic Postural Control Ability during Landing Single-leg Forward Jumps in Adult Women With and Without Chronic Ankle Instability

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109636880

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the kinematic and kinetic variables of the lower limb during single-leg forward jump landing in adult women with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI) and to examine its effects on postural stability.
      Method: Participants were classified into the CAI group (n = 17, mean age 22.18 ± 2.38 years, mean height 161.97 ± 3.66 cm, mean weight 54.30 ± 8.15 kg) and the control group (n = 17, mean age 23.24 ± 2.97 years, mean height 164.32 ± 6.07 cm, mean weight 55.29 ± 6.38 kg). Participants performed a forward jump using the non-dominant foot and landed on the dominant foot. The study measured lower limb joint angles, the center of mass (COM) and center of pressure (COP) inclination angles of the pelvis, loading rate, and leg stiffness. An independent t-test was used to compare postural control ability between the two groups, with the significance level set at α < .05.
      Results: Compared to the control group, the CAI group exhibited a significantly smaller hip abduction angle and a significantly greater hip internal rotation angle. The knee flexion angle was larger, and the ankle dorsiflexion and inversion angles were significantly greater in the CAI group. In terms of the COM-COP inclination angle of the pelvis, the anterior-posterior inclination angle was significantly smaller in the CAI group.
      Conclusion: Differences were observed only in kinematic variables during movement, whereas no significant differences were found in loading rate and leg stiffness. This suggests that the two groups employ different postural control strategies to absorb the same impact forces and recover a stable posture.
      번역하기

      Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the kinematic and kinetic variables of the lower limb during single-leg forward jump landing in adult women with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI) and to examine its effects on postural stab...

      Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the kinematic and kinetic variables of the lower limb during single-leg forward jump landing in adult women with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI) and to examine its effects on postural stability.
      Method: Participants were classified into the CAI group (n = 17, mean age 22.18 ± 2.38 years, mean height 161.97 ± 3.66 cm, mean weight 54.30 ± 8.15 kg) and the control group (n = 17, mean age 23.24 ± 2.97 years, mean height 164.32 ± 6.07 cm, mean weight 55.29 ± 6.38 kg). Participants performed a forward jump using the non-dominant foot and landed on the dominant foot. The study measured lower limb joint angles, the center of mass (COM) and center of pressure (COP) inclination angles of the pelvis, loading rate, and leg stiffness. An independent t-test was used to compare postural control ability between the two groups, with the significance level set at α < .05.
      Results: Compared to the control group, the CAI group exhibited a significantly smaller hip abduction angle and a significantly greater hip internal rotation angle. The knee flexion angle was larger, and the ankle dorsiflexion and inversion angles were significantly greater in the CAI group. In terms of the COM-COP inclination angle of the pelvis, the anterior-posterior inclination angle was significantly smaller in the CAI group.
      Conclusion: Differences were observed only in kinematic variables during movement, whereas no significant differences were found in loading rate and leg stiffness. This suggests that the two groups employ different postural control strategies to absorb the same impact forces and recover a stable posture.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼