RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Testing Method for On-Site Measurement of Explosive Materials Contaminated on Travel Luggage Bag and Backpack Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106038436

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Testing method for the on-site detection of explosive materials contaminated on the travel luggage bag (TLB) and backpack (BP) surfaces was established using ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) and smear matrix. Trinitrotoluene and 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane were used as model explosive materials. Two sampling methods of rolling (with a metal roller) and handrubbing were used, and stainless steel mesh was used as the smear matrix for collection of explosive material. Testing parts of the TLB and BP were selected in consideration of contaminant accumulation, physical contact, and sample collection. Explosive materials deposited on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sheet were transferred to the testing part, the explosive materials existing on the testing part were collected using the smear matrix, and then the collected explosive materials were analyzed using IMS. High signal-to-noise ratio over 10 was applied for the determination of the minimum initial explosive concentration (Cmin_PTFE) to detect in IMS. The hand-rubbing method was much more efficient than the rolling method. The Cmin_PTFE values were different according to the testing parts. The Cmin_PTFE values of the TLB were higher than those of the BP. The experimental results were explained by difference in surface morphology of the testing areas. The testing method can be helpful to select the sampling parts and to collect the explosive materials for on-site security checks.
      번역하기

      Testing method for the on-site detection of explosive materials contaminated on the travel luggage bag (TLB) and backpack (BP) surfaces was established using ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) and smear matrix. Trinitrotoluene and 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-tr...

      Testing method for the on-site detection of explosive materials contaminated on the travel luggage bag (TLB) and backpack (BP) surfaces was established using ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) and smear matrix. Trinitrotoluene and 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane were used as model explosive materials. Two sampling methods of rolling (with a metal roller) and handrubbing were used, and stainless steel mesh was used as the smear matrix for collection of explosive material. Testing parts of the TLB and BP were selected in consideration of contaminant accumulation, physical contact, and sample collection. Explosive materials deposited on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sheet were transferred to the testing part, the explosive materials existing on the testing part were collected using the smear matrix, and then the collected explosive materials were analyzed using IMS. High signal-to-noise ratio over 10 was applied for the determination of the minimum initial explosive concentration (Cmin_PTFE) to detect in IMS. The hand-rubbing method was much more efficient than the rolling method. The Cmin_PTFE values were different according to the testing parts. The Cmin_PTFE values of the TLB were higher than those of the BP. The experimental results were explained by difference in surface morphology of the testing areas. The testing method can be helpful to select the sampling parts and to collect the explosive materials for on-site security checks.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 J. Lee, 120 : 64-, 2014

      2 S. D. Harvey, 12 : 115-, 2009

      3 M. Najarro, 137 : 2614-, 2012

      4 K. M. Roscioli, 83 : 5965-, 2011

      5 A. Zalewska, 226 : 168-, 2013

      6 M. Tam, 76 : 2741-, 2004

      7 S. Armenta, 703 : 114-, 2011

      8 T. Khayamian, 59 : 327-, 2003

      9 H. Ostmark, 37 : 12-, 2012

      10 M. Wrable-Rose, 11 : 147-, 2010

      1 J. Lee, 120 : 64-, 2014

      2 S. D. Harvey, 12 : 115-, 2009

      3 M. Najarro, 137 : 2614-, 2012

      4 K. M. Roscioli, 83 : 5965-, 2011

      5 A. Zalewska, 226 : 168-, 2013

      6 M. Tam, 76 : 2741-, 2004

      7 S. Armenta, 703 : 114-, 2011

      8 T. Khayamian, 59 : 327-, 2003

      9 H. Ostmark, 37 : 12-, 2012

      10 M. Wrable-Rose, 11 : 147-, 2010

      11 O. M. Primera-Pedrozo, 10 : 1-, 2009

      12 S.-S. Choi, 9 : 2505-, 2017

      13 M. E. Staymates, 13 : 4844-, 2013

      14 J. R. Verkouteren, 15 : 373-, 2013

      15 A. Strachan, 91 : 098301-, 2003

      16 A. E. D. M. van der Heijden, 4 : 999-, 2004

      17 N. I. Golovina, 113 : 229-, 1994

      18 최성신, "Negative Ion Formation of Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate in Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization-Mass Spectrometry and in Corona Discharge Ionization-Ion Mobility Spectrometry" 대한화학회 32 (32): 1055-1058, 2011

      19 최성신, "Influence of Smear Matrix Type on Detection Efficiencies of Explosives in Corona Discharge-Ion Mobility Spectrometer" 대한화학회 37 (37): 604-607, 2016

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.58 0.11 0.38
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.23 0.213 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼