首都圈 亂開發形 住居團地의 類型 및 實態分析에 關한 硏究 = A Study on Types and Characteristics of Unplanned Residential District in the Seoul Metropolitan Area

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

After the construction of five new-towns in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, the development of residential area depends on unplanned way with priority to small scaled development in quasi-agricultural and quasi-urban zone. Unplanned development in the Seoul Metropolitan Area results from increase of residential area development pressure, enlargement of commutable area, the based-law which controls national land use, and so on. This kind of unplanned development is represented by many types as a result of negative effects it makes. This study brings to a focus into unplanned residential district which suffers lack of urban infrastructure facilities.
Unplanned residential district is divided into three types.
1. The new-town vicinity type which has a locational advantage resulted from adjacency to New-town's urban infrastructure facilities.
2. The principal road vicinity type which lies adjacent to the main street such as Kyung-bu expressway.
3. The isolated type which separates from new-to주s and principal road for the pursuit of economical advantages.
Followings are main inquiries of this study :
1. Does the negative effect of unplanned residential district appear dissimilarly by conditions of location?
2. What quantitative and qualitative level of urban infrastructure facility can be solutions for unplanned residential development? By means of literature and statistical reviews, utilization of GIS application program and field survey, following results are derived.
First, inhabitants of unplanned residential districts feel inconvenience and dissatisfaction in using urban infrastructure facilities as well as deficiency.
Second, the negative effect of unplanned residential district appear dissimilarly by conditions of location. inhabitants of each unplanned residential district show different responses for asking the need and satisfaction of urban infrastructure facilities.
Third, unplanned residential districts suffer from lack of urban infrastructure facilities. Due to uniform application of law related to residential district construction, companies and people who owned land can pursue economical advantage easily without provision of required urban infrastructure facilities.
As concern about unplanned development draws public attention, the government has tried to solve the unplanned development problem such as "the low for national land use and plan". In spite of this effort, there are suspicions about this effectof low yet and if the government desire to solve the problem, it should not overlook the reason unplanned residential district takes place. Unplanned residential districts result from housing policy which pursue economical and political objective only and does not consider inhabitant's demand. Therefore, government prepare possible solutions in a viewpoint of inhabitants, and make based-law for inhabitants' participation in residential district construction. And government must consider residential district development which is constructed and will be also.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 6
• 1. 연구의 범위 = 6
• 2. 연구의 방법 = 7
• 제3절 선행연구의 검토 = 9
• 제2장 이론적 배경 = 16
• 제1절 주거단지 개발에 관한 이론적 배경 = 16
• 1. 주거단지의 개념 및 의의 = 16
• 2. 주거단지 개발의 필요성 = 19
• 3. 주거단지 개발의 변천과정 = 21
• 4. 대도시 근교 주거단지개발 = 24
• 제2절 난개발 및 난개발형 주거단지의 개념 및 유형 = 26
• 1. 선행연구의 정리 = 26
• 2. 난개발 및 난개발형 주거단지의 개념 = 27
• 3. 난개발 주거단지의 유형 = 30
• 제3절 도시기반시설에 관한 이론적 배경 = 33
• 1. 도시기반시설의 개념 = 33
• 2. 도시기반시설의 특성 = 34
• 제3장 난개발형 주거단지의 발생원인 및 문제점 = 36
• 제1절 난개발형 주거단지의 발생원인 = 36
• 1. 수도권 개발압력의 증가 = 36
• 2. 통근권의 광역화 전개 = 38
• 3. 근거법적 요인 = 40
• 4. 개발이익의 귀속에 의한 요인 = 51
• 5.도시기반시설 설치의무의 적용에 의한 요인 = 52
• 제2절 난개발형 주거단지의 문제점 = 55
• 1. 도시기반시설의 양적 부족문제 = 55
• 2. 도시기반시설의 질적 수준 저하의 문제 = 55
• 3. 도시기반시설의 설치부담의 지역별 형평성 문제 = 56
• 제4장 수도권 난개발형 주거단지의 현황 = 58
• 제1절 난개발형 주거단지의 유형별 현황 = 58
• 1. 대상지의 일반 현황 = 58
• 2. 대상지의 개발 현황 = 60
• 제2절 난개발형 주거단지의 공급 필요량 및 접근성 = 63
• 1. 도시기반시설의 공급 필요량 = 63
• 2. 도시기반시설의 접근성 = 66
• 제5장 난개발형 주거단지의 실태조사 = 70
• 제1절 조사 개요 = 70
• 1. 조사의 목적 = 70
• 2. 조사의 범위 = 70
• 3. 조사의 방법 = 71
• 제2절 조사대상자의 특성 분석 = 72
• 1. 조사대상자의 인구통계학적 특성 = 72
• 2. 도시기반시설의 이용도 분석 = 80
• 제3절 도시기반시설의 만족도 분석 = 84
• 1. 도시기반시설의 양적 만족도 조사 = 84
• 2. 도시기반시설의 질적 만족도 조사 = 87
• 제4절 설문조사결과의 종합 = 100
• 제5절 정책적 시사점 = 105
• 제6장 결론 = 110
• <참고문헌> = 113
• #부록1 : 설문지 = 118
• #부록2 : 쌍대비교에 의한 가중치 산정 = 123
• = 123