RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      『文章』 게재 시의 특성 = The Characteristics of Poems Published in Munjang - Focusing on the aspects of mixing the ‘old’ and the ‘new’

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82387160

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It is very difficult to have an overall understanding of 195 poems published in Munjang. Munjang was not the literary magazine for writers from specific trends or schools of literary thoughts. It published poems of 55 poets and it is not too much to say that almost all prominent poets of that period published their poems in Munjang. Therefore, it would be very difficult to find out the characteristics of poems published in Munjang according to a single standard.
      Among poems in Munjang, Poems by Jeong Ji-yong and Paek Seok are influenced by the ‘old’. They accepted the past literary tradition and developed a new form, and extended the context of temporal and spatial meanings of poems. This paper confirmed the intensity of admiration for the past in poems by Jo Ji-hoon and Park Jong-hwa. These are examples of the influence of the ‘old’ in Munjang. Especially, intense admiration expressed in their poems is an extreme of taste in antique or classicism shown in poems of Munjang. Jeong Ji-yong mobilized sense to restore the world of landscape in his later poems. His sense was obtained from the tradition of the Orient. The ‘new’, an elaborate and detailed sense succeeded and developed by Jeong Ji-yong and the ‘old’, an inclination for taste in antique or classicism of Munjang meet.
      The relation between 195 poems by 55 poets and the inclination for taste in antique or classicism of Munjang is very distinctive. This paper made detailed investigation into how the characteristics of Munjang was reflected in all poems published in Munjang or how each poet reacted to this characteristics. And with this investigation, it examined how the inclination for taste in antique or classicism of Munjang permeated into the characteristics of poems in that period and how it was modified by each poet. As with the case of Jeong Ji-yong, poems in Munjang showed the aspects of mixing the ‘old’ and the ‘new.’ Classifying poems in Munjang into the ‘old’ and the ‘new’, this paper clarified that these two were not in opposition but in the process of compromising. The old and the new are distinguished externally, however, the difference is not so great except the primary characteristics of subject matter and form. This paper revealed that there is no value rank between the ‘old’ and the ‘new.’ They were equal and parallel at the same time. In poems of Munjang, the ‘old’, presented with the inclination for taste in antique or classicism and the ‘new’ of those days, products of modern era coexisted together.
      번역하기

      It is very difficult to have an overall understanding of 195 poems published in Munjang. Munjang was not the literary magazine for writers from specific trends or schools of literary thoughts. It published poems of 55 poets and it is not too much to s...

      It is very difficult to have an overall understanding of 195 poems published in Munjang. Munjang was not the literary magazine for writers from specific trends or schools of literary thoughts. It published poems of 55 poets and it is not too much to say that almost all prominent poets of that period published their poems in Munjang. Therefore, it would be very difficult to find out the characteristics of poems published in Munjang according to a single standard.
      Among poems in Munjang, Poems by Jeong Ji-yong and Paek Seok are influenced by the ‘old’. They accepted the past literary tradition and developed a new form, and extended the context of temporal and spatial meanings of poems. This paper confirmed the intensity of admiration for the past in poems by Jo Ji-hoon and Park Jong-hwa. These are examples of the influence of the ‘old’ in Munjang. Especially, intense admiration expressed in their poems is an extreme of taste in antique or classicism shown in poems of Munjang. Jeong Ji-yong mobilized sense to restore the world of landscape in his later poems. His sense was obtained from the tradition of the Orient. The ‘new’, an elaborate and detailed sense succeeded and developed by Jeong Ji-yong and the ‘old’, an inclination for taste in antique or classicism of Munjang meet.
      The relation between 195 poems by 55 poets and the inclination for taste in antique or classicism of Munjang is very distinctive. This paper made detailed investigation into how the characteristics of Munjang was reflected in all poems published in Munjang or how each poet reacted to this characteristics. And with this investigation, it examined how the inclination for taste in antique or classicism of Munjang permeated into the characteristics of poems in that period and how it was modified by each poet. As with the case of Jeong Ji-yong, poems in Munjang showed the aspects of mixing the ‘old’ and the ‘new.’ Classifying poems in Munjang into the ‘old’ and the ‘new’, this paper clarified that these two were not in opposition but in the process of compromising. The old and the new are distinguished externally, however, the difference is not so great except the primary characteristics of subject matter and form. This paper revealed that there is no value rank between the ‘old’ and the ‘new.’ They were equal and parallel at the same time. In poems of Munjang, the ‘old’, presented with the inclination for taste in antique or classicism and the ‘new’ of those days, products of modern era coexisted together.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 본론
      • 3. 결론
      • 【참고문헌】
      • 【Abstract】
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 본론
      • 3. 결론
      • 【참고문헌】
      • 【Abstract】
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 황종연, "한국문학의 근대와 반근대-1930년대 후반기 문학의 전통주의 연구" 동국대 1992

      2 이봉범, "잡지 『문장』의 성격과 위상" 반교어문학회 22 (22): 105-137, 2007

      3 정종현, "식민지 후반기 한국문학에 나타난 동양론 연구" 동국대 2006

      4 황종연, "문장파 문학의 정신사적 성격" 동악어문학회 21 : 1986

      5 류준형, "문장지의 시조 작품 연구" 국어국문학회 95 : 1986

      6 김이상, "문장지의 시 연구1" 한국어문교육학회 5 : 1982

      7 김윤식, "문장지의 세계관 in: 한국근대문학사상비판" 일지사 1980

      8 이숭원, "문장지 시에 나타난 고향의식 시고" 한국어교육학회 36 : 1980

      9 이명희, "문장이 보여준 ‘전통’의 의미와 의의 in: 1930년대 후반 문학의 근대성과 자기 성찰" 깊은샘 1998

      10 배개화, "『문장』지의 내간체 수용 양상" 한국현대소설학회 (21) : 141-160, 2004

      1 황종연, "한국문학의 근대와 반근대-1930년대 후반기 문학의 전통주의 연구" 동국대 1992

      2 이봉범, "잡지 『문장』의 성격과 위상" 반교어문학회 22 (22): 105-137, 2007

      3 정종현, "식민지 후반기 한국문학에 나타난 동양론 연구" 동국대 2006

      4 황종연, "문장파 문학의 정신사적 성격" 동악어문학회 21 : 1986

      5 류준형, "문장지의 시조 작품 연구" 국어국문학회 95 : 1986

      6 김이상, "문장지의 시 연구1" 한국어문교육학회 5 : 1982

      7 김윤식, "문장지의 세계관 in: 한국근대문학사상비판" 일지사 1980

      8 이숭원, "문장지 시에 나타난 고향의식 시고" 한국어교육학회 36 : 1980

      9 이명희, "문장이 보여준 ‘전통’의 의미와 의의 in: 1930년대 후반 문학의 근대성과 자기 성찰" 깊은샘 1998

      10 배개화, "『문장』지의 내간체 수용 양상" 한국현대소설학회 (21) : 141-160, 2004

      11 차혜영, "‘조선학’과 식민지 근대의 ‘지(知)’의 제도 - 『문장』을 중심으로" 국어국문학회 141 : 505-533, 2005

      12 이명찬, "1940년 전후의 시정신-인문평론과 문장을 중심으로" 18 : 1999

      13 최승호, "1930년대 후반기 시의 전통지향적 미의식 연구-문장파 자연시를 중심으로" 서울대 1994

      14 차승기, "1930년대 후반 전통론 연구" 연세대 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-04-01 평가 등재후보로 하락(현장점검) (기타) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.39 0.39 0.41
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.5 0.5 0.701 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼