RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    마약성 진통제를 이용한 암성 통증의 효율적 관리에 대한 약사의 임상업무 개발 = Cancer Pain Management through a Pharmacist-based Opioid Analgesics Administration

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82369127

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Patients with cancer have diverse symptoms, impairments in physical and psychological functioning, and other difficulties that can undermine their quality of life.
    Generally, oral and transdermal morphine has been recognized as the analgesic of first choice in the management of increasing or persisting cancer pain. In this study, we evaluated the adequacy of pain control using opioid analgesics in terminal cancer patients in this hospital, and considered the pharmacist's role in the cancer pain management process. From August to October 2005, we conducted medication counseling of opioid analgesics in cancer patients, and gave them questionnaires to evaluate the efficacy of the opioid analgesics and occurring complications. Also, we investigated the ratio of pharmacist's intervention in using opioid analgesics. On the cancer pain intensity, 83 percent of patients experienced moderate to severe pain. 60 percent of patients satisfied opioid's analgesic effects, but 28.5 percents complained inadequate pain management. 62.8% of patients experienced adverse effects by opioid analgesics, and the list of common adverse effects includes constipation (40.6%), drowsiness (27.5%), dry mouth (20.3%), nausea and vomiting (8.7%). The rationale of the clinical pharmacist's intervention in using opioid analgesics was 35.7 percent, including alteration of the prescription about opioid analgesics (35.2%), relief from the adverse effects (26.5%), improvement of the patient's recognition about using opioids (26.5%). The results showed most patients administrated opioid analgesics had severe pain, and some of them experienced inadequate pain control or adverse effects. In conclusion, the pharmacists should be clinically well experienced and evaluate administrating opioid analgesic's efficacy. In addition, they should induce modification of the inappropriate prescription as the communication mediators between the doctor and the patients. Then, cancer pain management service could be more effective and patient's quality of life would be more improved.
    번역하기

    Patients with cancer have diverse symptoms, impairments in physical and psychological functioning, and other difficulties that can undermine their quality of life. Generally, oral and transdermal morphine has been recognized as the analgesic of first...

    Patients with cancer have diverse symptoms, impairments in physical and psychological functioning, and other difficulties that can undermine their quality of life.
    Generally, oral and transdermal morphine has been recognized as the analgesic of first choice in the management of increasing or persisting cancer pain. In this study, we evaluated the adequacy of pain control using opioid analgesics in terminal cancer patients in this hospital, and considered the pharmacist's role in the cancer pain management process. From August to October 2005, we conducted medication counseling of opioid analgesics in cancer patients, and gave them questionnaires to evaluate the efficacy of the opioid analgesics and occurring complications. Also, we investigated the ratio of pharmacist's intervention in using opioid analgesics. On the cancer pain intensity, 83 percent of patients experienced moderate to severe pain. 60 percent of patients satisfied opioid's analgesic effects, but 28.5 percents complained inadequate pain management. 62.8% of patients experienced adverse effects by opioid analgesics, and the list of common adverse effects includes constipation (40.6%), drowsiness (27.5%), dry mouth (20.3%), nausea and vomiting (8.7%). The rationale of the clinical pharmacist's intervention in using opioid analgesics was 35.7 percent, including alteration of the prescription about opioid analgesics (35.2%), relief from the adverse effects (26.5%), improvement of the patient's recognition about using opioids (26.5%). The results showed most patients administrated opioid analgesics had severe pain, and some of them experienced inadequate pain control or adverse effects. In conclusion, the pharmacists should be clinically well experienced and evaluate administrating opioid analgesic's efficacy. In addition, they should induce modification of the inappropriate prescription as the communication mediators between the doctor and the patients. Then, cancer pain management service could be more effective and patient's quality of life would be more improved.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼