RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The Stories We Tell Ourselves: Multiplicity’s Impact on the Post 9/11 Strategic Narrative and Its Influence on America’s Military Strategy.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16798324

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022

      • 학위수여대학

        The University of Utah Political Science

      • 수여연도

        2022

      • 작성언어

        영어

      • 주제어
      • 학위

        Ph.D.

      • 페이지수

        223 p.

      • 지도교수/심사위원

        Advisor: Steele, Brent J.

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The substance of this dissertation is focused on exploring strategic narratives and the influence narratives have on military strategy development. The social nature of stories links narratives employed in strategic situations with meaning-making during times of conflict. Exploring strategic narratives within security studies provides greater richness and texture to our understanding of decisions made during conflicts. Presently, there are two broad approaches to understanding strategic narratives. The open-social construction approach views narratives as socially constructed storylines that shape understanding of events relative to the culture or society that composes the narrative. The open-social construction approach is a bottom-up methodology. Oppositely, the elite employment approach takes a top-down perspective. Strategic narratives are elite tools employed to achieve political or military agendas. However, this dissertation takes both approaches and proposes a hybrid strategic narrative approach. This approach attempts to reintroduce the social perspective back into strategic narratives.The US military recognizes the importance of strategic narratives and has sought to operationalize them within conflict. However, the military has not fully leveraged the body of academic literature to understand how strategic narratives have influence. Moreover, the theory in this dissertation argues that while the military is trying to operationalize strategic narratives, it is missing how strategic narratives influence strategy on the front end.By way of an applicable case, the attacks on 9/11 represent an inflection point between two periods where there is a distinct change within the strategic narratives and military strategy. During both periods, the American strategic narrative ecology comprised the president, Congress, news agencies, academics, and the broader public. Using the 9/11 case, this dissertation presents the framework to explore the change in strategic narratives and military strategy after the 9/11 attacks.
      번역하기

      The substance of this dissertation is focused on exploring strategic narratives and the influence narratives have on military strategy development. The social nature of stories links narratives employed in strategic situations with meaning-making dur...

      The substance of this dissertation is focused on exploring strategic narratives and the influence narratives have on military strategy development. The social nature of stories links narratives employed in strategic situations with meaning-making during times of conflict. Exploring strategic narratives within security studies provides greater richness and texture to our understanding of decisions made during conflicts. Presently, there are two broad approaches to understanding strategic narratives. The open-social construction approach views narratives as socially constructed storylines that shape understanding of events relative to the culture or society that composes the narrative. The open-social construction approach is a bottom-up methodology. Oppositely, the elite employment approach takes a top-down perspective. Strategic narratives are elite tools employed to achieve political or military agendas. However, this dissertation takes both approaches and proposes a hybrid strategic narrative approach. This approach attempts to reintroduce the social perspective back into strategic narratives.The US military recognizes the importance of strategic narratives and has sought to operationalize them within conflict. However, the military has not fully leveraged the body of academic literature to understand how strategic narratives have influence. Moreover, the theory in this dissertation argues that while the military is trying to operationalize strategic narratives, it is missing how strategic narratives influence strategy on the front end.By way of an applicable case, the attacks on 9/11 represent an inflection point between two periods where there is a distinct change within the strategic narratives and military strategy. During both periods, the American strategic narrative ecology comprised the president, Congress, news agencies, academics, and the broader public. Using the 9/11 case, this dissertation presents the framework to explore the change in strategic narratives and military strategy after the 9/11 attacks.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼