1930년대 <개벽사>의 문예 기획과 매체 정체성의 변화양상 연구- 『혜성』, 『제일선』, 속간 『개벽』을 중심으로- = A study on the changing aspects of literary planning and media identity of <Gaebyeoksa> in the 1930s - Focusing on 『Heseong』, 『Jeilseon』, 『Gaebyeok』 -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper explores the changing aspects of literary planning and media identity of <Gaebyeoksa> magazine in the 1930s, which was neglected in the history of modern media research, and examines how <Gaebyeoksa> came to be closed after repeated ups and downs in the 1930s.
『Heseong』 was published in the 1920s as a magazine that would inherit the spirit of 『Gaebyeok』. 『Heseong』 was an editorial- oriented magazine with strong positive opinions, and this also revealed many KAPF-like tendencies in literature. Exposure of this tendency made the magazine overall heavy and difficult, so it had no choice but to be ignored by readers. As a way to overcome this problem, the editorial staff changed the title to 『Jeilseon』 and planned a new literary section to change the magazine's identity.
『Jeilseon』 was a magazine created with a focus on ‘easiness’ and the revival of ‘literary arts.’ 『Jeilseon』 reduced the editorial section and greatly expanded the literary section. Also, efforts were made to break away from the difficult and heavy image of 『Comet』 by actively recruiting new writers. However, the appointment of new writers resulted in a deterioration in the quality of literary art, leading to criticism from the literary world, and literary art that pursued 'easiness' by shifting from tendency to routine also resulted in being ignored by the reader public. 『Jeil-seon』 's literary planning succeeded in abandoning the identity of 『Hyesung』, but failed to gain popularity and identity of 『Jeilseon』.
The last published sequel, 『Gaebyeok』, was a magazine newly designed by the editors, taking into account the failures of 『Heseong』 and 『Jeilseon』, and faithfully meeting the requirements of a general magazine. The sequel, 『Gaebyeok』, was well received by readers as it secured diversity and expertise by publishing a large number of works by established writers in the literary arts project.
In short, while 『Hyesung』 and 『Jeil-seon』 were discontinued because they did not receive a favorable response from readers despite renewing the literary plan and changing identity, the sequel 『Gaebyeok』 was published in its 4th issue without being able to overcome various internal and external situations rather than internal factors of literary strategy. Finally, it was discontinued.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "혜성"

2 김근수, "한국잡지개관 및 호별목차집" 한국학연구소 534-, 1973

3 "제일선"

4 유석환, "식민지시기 근대소설의 발흥과 천도교 매체의 역할" 대동문화연구원 (73) : 231-257, 2011

5 "별건곤"

6 유석환, "개벽사의 출판활동과 근대잡지" 성균관대학교 대학원 2007

7 "개벽"

8 김경미, "『별건곤』 서사 독물의 대중성에 대한 매체 전략 연구" 한국어문학회 (133) : 239-276, 2016

9 김경미, "『별건곤』 ‘5전 잡지’의 매체 전략과 대중성의 역학관계" 한국어문학회 (148) : 131-163, 2020

10 "『개벽』속간"

11 이경돈, "『別乾坤』과 近代 趣味讀物" 대동문화연구원 (46) : 249-287, 2004

12 정용서, "1930년대 개벽사 발간 잡지의 편집자들" 역사실학회 (57) : 225-260, 2015

13 김경미, "1930년대 <개벽사> 잡지의 매체 전략과 대중성의 역학관계 연구" 배달말학회 (70) : 227-264, 2022

14 최수일, "1920년대 문학과 『개벽』의 위상" 성균관대학교 대학원 2002