RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Comparative Analysis of SDIs for Korea, Japan and China

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104996857

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Ever since the concept of "Sustainable Development" was introduced, there is no internationally standardized system with which to compare and evaluate sustainable development between nations and regions. This paper aims to develop sustainable development indicators (SDIs) suitable for North-east Asian countries, and to evaluate the degree of regional sustainable development through a comparative study on SDIs. Related with sustainable development of Korea, Japan and China, the indicators are selected by referring to the SDIs of the international organizations and nations. In particular, correction, addition, and deletion are used in order to constitute indicator systems suitable for the actual circumstances of these three countries based on the indicators of the UN. 4 sectors, 43 indicators, in this paper, are selected as regional SDIs. The comparative analysis of regional SDIs provides that Korea, Japan and China show similar path of sustainable development by but have different time lag.
      번역하기

      Ever since the concept of "Sustainable Development" was introduced, there is no internationally standardized system with which to compare and evaluate sustainable development between nations and regions. This paper aims to develop sustainable developm...

      Ever since the concept of "Sustainable Development" was introduced, there is no internationally standardized system with which to compare and evaluate sustainable development between nations and regions. This paper aims to develop sustainable development indicators (SDIs) suitable for North-east Asian countries, and to evaluate the degree of regional sustainable development through a comparative study on SDIs. Related with sustainable development of Korea, Japan and China, the indicators are selected by referring to the SDIs of the international organizations and nations. In particular, correction, addition, and deletion are used in order to constitute indicator systems suitable for the actual circumstances of these three countries based on the indicators of the UN. 4 sectors, 43 indicators, in this paper, are selected as regional SDIs. The comparative analysis of regional SDIs provides that Korea, Japan and China show similar path of sustainable development by but have different time lag.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Toward Indicators for Institutional Sustainability: Lessons from an Analysis of Agenda 21" 2 : 61-77, 2002

      2 "Sustainable Development Indicators for Korea" 10 (10): 115-128, 2002

      3 "Progress of Korea Statistical Indicators Based on OECD Sustainable Development Indicators" 12 (12): 35-52, 2004a

      4 "Overview of Sustainable Development Indicators Used by National and International Agencies" 2002

      5 "Northeast Asia Sustainable Development Indicators" 2004b

      6 "Development of National Sustainable Development Indicators" Ministry of Environment 2001

      7 "Assessing Sustainable Development: Principles and in Practice" Manitoba, Canada 1997

      8 "Asia and Pacific Regional Expert Workshop on Sustainable Development Indicators" International Workshop Proceedings,Seoul 2003

      1 "Toward Indicators for Institutional Sustainability: Lessons from an Analysis of Agenda 21" 2 : 61-77, 2002

      2 "Sustainable Development Indicators for Korea" 10 (10): 115-128, 2002

      3 "Progress of Korea Statistical Indicators Based on OECD Sustainable Development Indicators" 12 (12): 35-52, 2004a

      4 "Overview of Sustainable Development Indicators Used by National and International Agencies" 2002

      5 "Northeast Asia Sustainable Development Indicators" 2004b

      6 "Development of National Sustainable Development Indicators" Ministry of Environment 2001

      7 "Assessing Sustainable Development: Principles and in Practice" Manitoba, Canada 1997

      8 "Asia and Pacific Regional Expert Workshop on Sustainable Development Indicators" International Workshop Proceedings,Seoul 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-06-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean Official Statistics -> Journal of the Korean Official Statistics KCI등재
      2020-06-03 학회명변경 영문명 : Sratistics Korea -> Statistics Korea KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-07-18 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Official Statistics KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-07-07 학술지등록 한글명 : 통계연구
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.5
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.49 0.48 0.981 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼