RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    17세기 시조 한역의 성격과 의미 = The Aspect of a Classical Chinese Translation of Sijo(시조) in the 17th century and its Meaning

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45028344

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The aim of this paper is to examine the aspect of a Classical Chinese translation of Sijo in the 17th century and its literary-historical meaning. The results are as follows. There are two methods of Classical Chinese translation in the late 17th century. The one is to transform Sijo into Sino-Korean poetry privately, and the other is to convey Sijo just as like that in accordance with the surroundings of a performance. The former is to take over the aspect of a Classical Chinese translation until the 16th century, while, the latter is to show a new trend that takes a serious view of Sijo music and is eager to record Sijo. The early stage of Classical Chinese Translation of Sijo is an experimental and fragmentary work which is not only customary but also regarded as an expediency. Arriving around the late 17th century and the early 18th century, it shows a trend of generalization by many authors. Two methods of Classical Chinese translation, a `representation` for `record` and a `conversion-to-poem` by `conversion-to-self, can be understood as a transitional figure in the history of Classical Chinese translation of Sijo. The process of Classical Chinese translation of Sijo puts a series of repetitional process into its own body. With studying such Classical Chinese translation of Sijo, we`ll be able to step up to literary-historical facts of late Chosun more concretely and precisely.
    번역하기

    The aim of this paper is to examine the aspect of a Classical Chinese translation of Sijo in the 17th century and its literary-historical meaning. The results are as follows. There are two methods of Classical Chinese translation in the late 17th cen...

    The aim of this paper is to examine the aspect of a Classical Chinese translation of Sijo in the 17th century and its literary-historical meaning. The results are as follows. There are two methods of Classical Chinese translation in the late 17th century. The one is to transform Sijo into Sino-Korean poetry privately, and the other is to convey Sijo just as like that in accordance with the surroundings of a performance. The former is to take over the aspect of a Classical Chinese translation until the 16th century, while, the latter is to show a new trend that takes a serious view of Sijo music and is eager to record Sijo. The early stage of Classical Chinese Translation of Sijo is an experimental and fragmentary work which is not only customary but also regarded as an expediency. Arriving around the late 17th century and the early 18th century, it shows a trend of generalization by many authors. Two methods of Classical Chinese translation, a `representation` for `record` and a `conversion-to-poem` by `conversion-to-self, can be understood as a transitional figure in the history of Classical Chinese translation of Sijo. The process of Classical Chinese translation of Sijo puts a series of repetitional process into its own body. With studying such Classical Chinese translation of Sijo, we`ll be able to step up to literary-historical facts of late Chosun more concretely and precisely.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼