RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

    Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Comparison of the Efficacies and Feasibilities of Regional and General Anesthesia

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104592127

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: To compare surgical outcomes and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under regional or general anesthesia.
    Materials and Methods: One hundred and one patients who underwent PCNL as a first-line treatment for kidney calculi between June 2004 and June 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were classified into two groups by anesthetic method: 77 were allocated to the regional anesthesia group and 24 to the general anesthesia group. Patient general characteristics, stone features, surgical outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups.
    Results: The two groups were similar in terms of mean age and stone size, number, and type. Furthermore, they did not differ significantly in terms of general characteristics, treatment outcomes, or complications excluding postoperative fever. However, mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the regional anesthesia group than in the general anesthesia group (8.9±3.2 days vs. 11.5±6.9 days, respectively, p=0.025). Also, the postoperative fever rate was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group (53.2% vs. 83.3%, respectively, p=0.007).
    Conclusions: Regional anesthesia is as effective as general anesthesia during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and is associated with shorter hospital stays and lower rates of postoperative fever.
    번역하기

    Purpose: To compare surgical outcomes and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under regional or general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: One hundred and one patients who underwent PCNL as a first-line treatment for kidney calcul...

    Purpose: To compare surgical outcomes and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under regional or general anesthesia.
    Materials and Methods: One hundred and one patients who underwent PCNL as a first-line treatment for kidney calculi between June 2004 and June 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were classified into two groups by anesthetic method: 77 were allocated to the regional anesthesia group and 24 to the general anesthesia group. Patient general characteristics, stone features, surgical outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups.
    Results: The two groups were similar in terms of mean age and stone size, number, and type. Furthermore, they did not differ significantly in terms of general characteristics, treatment outcomes, or complications excluding postoperative fever. However, mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the regional anesthesia group than in the general anesthesia group (8.9±3.2 days vs. 11.5±6.9 days, respectively, p=0.025). Also, the postoperative fever rate was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group (53.2% vs. 83.3%, respectively, p=0.007).
    Conclusions: Regional anesthesia is as effective as general anesthesia during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and is associated with shorter hospital stays and lower rates of postoperative fever.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 권택민, "경피적 신쇄석술: 단일 병원 610례의 경험" 대한비뇨기과학회 50 (50): 669-674, 2009

    2 Lojanapiwat B, "Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches" 20 : 491-494, 2006

    3 Al-Kohlany KM, "Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy" 173 : 469-473, 2005

    4 Faas CL, "The effects of spinal anesthesia vs epidural anesthesia on 3 potential postoperative complications: pain, urinary retention, and mobility following inguinal herniorrhaphy" 70 : 441-447, 2002

    5 Stening SG, "Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole caliceal calculi" 12 : 359-362, 1998

    6 Jun-Ou J, "Supracostal access: does it affect tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy efficacy and safety?" 36 : 171-176, 2010

    7 Gonano C, "Spinal versus general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: anesthesia drug and supply costs" 102 : 524-529, 2006

    8 Neligan PJ., "Postoperative noninvasive ventilation" 30 : 495-511, 2012

    9 Corbel L, "Percutaneous surgery for lithiasis: results and perspectives. Apropos of 390 operations" 3 : 658-665, 1993

    10 Fernstrom I, "Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique" 10 : 257-259, 1976

    1 권택민, "경피적 신쇄석술: 단일 병원 610례의 경험" 대한비뇨기과학회 50 (50): 669-674, 2009

    2 Lojanapiwat B, "Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches" 20 : 491-494, 2006

    3 Al-Kohlany KM, "Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy" 173 : 469-473, 2005

    4 Faas CL, "The effects of spinal anesthesia vs epidural anesthesia on 3 potential postoperative complications: pain, urinary retention, and mobility following inguinal herniorrhaphy" 70 : 441-447, 2002

    5 Stening SG, "Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole caliceal calculi" 12 : 359-362, 1998

    6 Jun-Ou J, "Supracostal access: does it affect tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy efficacy and safety?" 36 : 171-176, 2010

    7 Gonano C, "Spinal versus general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: anesthesia drug and supply costs" 102 : 524-529, 2006

    8 Neligan PJ., "Postoperative noninvasive ventilation" 30 : 495-511, 2012

    9 Corbel L, "Percutaneous surgery for lithiasis: results and perspectives. Apropos of 390 operations" 3 : 658-665, 1993

    10 Fernstrom I, "Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique" 10 : 257-259, 1976

    11 Kuzgunbay B, "Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus combined spinal-epidural anesthesia" 23 : 1835-1838, 2009

    12 El-Husseiny T, "Percutaneous endourologic procedures in high-risk patients in the lateral decubitus position under regional anesthesia" 23 : 1603-1606, 2009

    13 Shir Y, "Intraoperative blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidural versus general anesthesia" 45 : 993-999, 1995

    14 Trivedi NS, "Interpleural block: a new technique for regional anaesthesia during percutaneous nephrostomy and nephrolithotomy" 37 (37): 479-481, 1990

    15 Davis FM, "Influence of spinal and general anaesthesia on haemostasis during total hip arthroplasty" 59 : 561-571, 1987

    16 Kasper DL, "Harrison’s principle of internal medicine. 16th ed" McGrawhill 2005

    17 Salonia A, "General versus spinal anesthesia with different forms of sedation in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: results of a prospective, randomized study" 13 : 1185-1190, 2006

    18 Mehrabi S, "General versus spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy" 10 : 756-761, 2013

    19 Aravantinos E, "Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under assisted local anaesthesia: a prospective study on selected patients with upper urinary tract obstruction" 51 : 224-227, 2007

    20 Tangpaitoon T, "Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective and randomized study comparing regional epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia" 38 : 504-511, 2012

    21 Barak M, "ETView tracheoscopic ventilation tube for surveillance after tube position in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy" 104 : 501-504, 2010

    22 Reynolds T., "Declaration of Helsinki revised" 92 : 1801-1803, 2000

    23 신태승, "Complications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Classified by the Modified Clavien Grading System: A Single Center’s Experience over 16 Years" 대한비뇨기과학회 52 (52): 769-775, 2011

    24 Maurer SG, "Comparison of outcomes of using spinal versus general anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty" 36 : E101-E106, 2007

    25 Dindo D, "Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey" 240 : 205-213, 2004

    26 Preminger GM, "Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations" 173 : 1991-2000, 2005

    27 Miller RD, "Basics of anesthesia. 6th ed" Elsevier 2011

    28 Singh V, "A prospective randomized study comparing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia" 87 : 293-298, 2011

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2019-03-12 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한비뇨기과학회 -> 대한비뇨의학회 KCI등재
    2016-03-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Investigative and Clinical Urology KCI등재
    2016-01-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : Korean Journal of Urology -> Investigative and Clinical Urology KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-02-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한비뇨기과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Urology
    외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Urology -> 미등록
    KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.14 0.14 0.13
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.13 0.12 0.314 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼