RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Long-term Treatment Outcomes Between Surgical Correction and Conservative Management for Penile Fracture: Retrospective Analysis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104590898

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Early surgical management is the standard of care for penile fracture.
      Conservative treatment is an option with recent reports revealing lower success rates.
      We reviewed the data and long-term outcomes of patients with penile injury submitted to surgical or conservative treatment.
      Materials and Methods: Between January 2004 and February 2012, 42 patients with penile blunt trauma on an erect penis were admitted to our center. We analyzed the following variables: age, etiology, symptoms and signs, diagnostic tests, treatment used, complications and erectile function during the follow-up. One patient was excluded due to missing information. Thirty-five patients underwent surgical repair and 6 patients were submitted to conservative management.
      Results: Mean follow-up was 19.2 months (range, 7 days to 72 months). The mean elapsed time from trauma to surgery was 21.3±12.5 hours. Trauma during sexual relationship was the main cause (80.9%) of penile fracture. Urethral injury was present in five patients submitted to surgery. Dorsal vein injury occurred in three patients with false penile fracture and concomitant spongious corpus lesion was present in three patients. During follow-up, 31 cases (88.6%) of the surgical group and four cases (66.7%) of the conservative group reported sufficient erections for intercourse, with no voiding dysfunction and no penile curvature. However, the remaining two patients (33.3%) from the conservative group developed erectile dysfunction and three patients (50%) developed penile deviation.
      Conclusions: Surgical approach provides excellent functional outcomes and lower complications. Early surgical management of penile fracture provides superior results and conservative approach should be avoided.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Early surgical management is the standard of care for penile fracture. Conservative treatment is an option with recent reports revealing lower success rates. We reviewed the data and long-term outcomes of patients with penile injury submitt...

      Purpose: Early surgical management is the standard of care for penile fracture.
      Conservative treatment is an option with recent reports revealing lower success rates.
      We reviewed the data and long-term outcomes of patients with penile injury submitted to surgical or conservative treatment.
      Materials and Methods: Between January 2004 and February 2012, 42 patients with penile blunt trauma on an erect penis were admitted to our center. We analyzed the following variables: age, etiology, symptoms and signs, diagnostic tests, treatment used, complications and erectile function during the follow-up. One patient was excluded due to missing information. Thirty-five patients underwent surgical repair and 6 patients were submitted to conservative management.
      Results: Mean follow-up was 19.2 months (range, 7 days to 72 months). The mean elapsed time from trauma to surgery was 21.3±12.5 hours. Trauma during sexual relationship was the main cause (80.9%) of penile fracture. Urethral injury was present in five patients submitted to surgery. Dorsal vein injury occurred in three patients with false penile fracture and concomitant spongious corpus lesion was present in three patients. During follow-up, 31 cases (88.6%) of the surgical group and four cases (66.7%) of the conservative group reported sufficient erections for intercourse, with no voiding dysfunction and no penile curvature. However, the remaining two patients (33.3%) from the conservative group developed erectile dysfunction and three patients (50%) developed penile deviation.
      Conclusions: Surgical approach provides excellent functional outcomes and lower complications. Early surgical management of penile fracture provides superior results and conservative approach should be avoided.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Mydlo JH, "Urethrography and cavernosography imaging in a small series of penile fractures: a comparison with surgical findings" 51 : 616-619, 1998

      2 Bennani S, "Traumatic rupture of the corpus cavernosum" 8 : 548-552, 1998

      3 Mydlo JH, "Surgeon experience with penile fracture" 166 : 526-528, 2001

      4 Yapanoglu T, "Seventeen years' experience of penile fracture: conservative vs. surgical treatment" 6 : 2058-2063, 2009

      5 Fergany AF, "Review of Cleveland Clinic experience with penile fracture" 54 : 352-355, 1999

      6 El-Bahnasawy MS, "Penile fractures: the successful outcome of immediate surgical intervention" 12 : 273-277, 2000

      7 Kamdar C, "Penile fracture: preoperative evaluation and surgical technique for optimal patient outcome" 102 : 1640-1644, 2008

      8 Gamal WM, "Penile fracture: long-term results of surgical and conservative management" 71 : 491-493, 2011

      9 Koifman L, "Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases" 29 : 35-39, 2003

      10 Kowalczyk J, "Penile fracture: an unusual presentation with lacerations of bilateral corpora cavernosa and partial disruption of the urethra" 44 : 599-600, 1994

      1 Mydlo JH, "Urethrography and cavernosography imaging in a small series of penile fractures: a comparison with surgical findings" 51 : 616-619, 1998

      2 Bennani S, "Traumatic rupture of the corpus cavernosum" 8 : 548-552, 1998

      3 Mydlo JH, "Surgeon experience with penile fracture" 166 : 526-528, 2001

      4 Yapanoglu T, "Seventeen years' experience of penile fracture: conservative vs. surgical treatment" 6 : 2058-2063, 2009

      5 Fergany AF, "Review of Cleveland Clinic experience with penile fracture" 54 : 352-355, 1999

      6 El-Bahnasawy MS, "Penile fractures: the successful outcome of immediate surgical intervention" 12 : 273-277, 2000

      7 Kamdar C, "Penile fracture: preoperative evaluation and surgical technique for optimal patient outcome" 102 : 1640-1644, 2008

      8 Gamal WM, "Penile fracture: long-term results of surgical and conservative management" 71 : 491-493, 2011

      9 Koifman L, "Penile fracture: experience in 56 cases" 29 : 35-39, 2003

      10 Kowalczyk J, "Penile fracture: an unusual presentation with lacerations of bilateral corpora cavernosa and partial disruption of the urethra" 44 : 599-600, 1994

      11 Zargooshi J, "Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: the long-term results of surgical treatment" 89 : 890-894, 2002

      12 Zargooshi J, "Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: report of 172 cases" 164 : 364-366, 2000

      13 Mellinger BC, "New surgical approach for operative management of penile fracture and penetrating trauma" 39 : 429-432, 1992

      14 Muentener M, "Long-term experience with surgical and conservative treatment of penile fracture" 172 : 576-579, 2004

      15 Naraynsingh V, "Late delayed repair of fractured penis" 31 : 231-233, 2010

      16 Creecy AA, "Fracture of the penis: traumatic rupture of corpora cavernosa" 78 : 620-627, 1957

      17 Ishikawa T, "Fracture of the penis: nine cases with evaluation of reported cases in Japan" 10 : 257-260, 2003

      18 Eke N, "Fracture of the penis" 89 : 555-565, 2002

      19 Ruckle HC, "Fracture of penis: diagnosis and management" 40 : 33-35, 1992

      20 Feki W, "False penile fracture: report of 16 cases" 19 : 471-473, 2007

      21 Agrawal SK, "Experience with penile fractures in Saudi Arabia" 67 : 644-646, 1991

      22 Mansi MK, "Experience with penile fractures in Egypt: long-term results of immediate surgical repair" 35 : 67-70, 1993

      23 Bar-Yosef Y, "Dorsal vein injuries observed during penile exploration for suspected penile fracture" 4 (4): 1142-1146, 2007

      24 Nasser TA, "Delayed surgical repair of penile fracture under local anesthesia" 5 : 2464-2469, 2008

      25 Mydlo JH, "Blunt, penetrating and ischemic injuries to the penis" 168 (168): 1433-1435, 2002

      26 Uygur MC, "13 years' experience of penile fracture" 31 : 265-266, 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-03-12 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한비뇨기과학회 -> 대한비뇨의학회 KCI등재
      2016-03-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Investigative and Clinical Urology KCI등재
      2016-01-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : Korean Journal of Urology -> Investigative and Clinical Urology KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-02-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한비뇨기과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Urology
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Urology -> 미등록
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.14 0.14 0.13
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.12 0.314 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼