RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      E-learning을 활용한 일반인 심폐소생술 교육의 효과 = E-learning can be Helpful for Mastering Basic Life Support Skills on Public

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104608699

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose: Barriers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)education are magnified by relative cost and course availability.
      E-learning has emerged as a viable solution for continuous,on-demand training and organizational learning.
      We assessed the hypothesis that E-learning is a viable strategy for CPR training of the general public and sought to evaluate its effects on CPR quality compared to traditional classroom-based methods.
      Methods: The E-learning program was specifically designed to teach basic life support skills, and consisted of 50 minutes internet lectures and simulation videos. The training session was freely available to twenty two officers in rural South Korea. The trainees were able to practice with a mannequin and an automated external defibrillator (AED)trainer at their place of employment over the course of 3days. The control group was trained at a hospital by certified instructors using the same equipment during a 2 hour period.
      At the end of the course, the participant’s skills were evaluated using a checklist and a skill performance test.
      Results: Forty two subjects were enrolled finally with 19 and 23 belonging to the E-learning and the control groups,respectively. One E-learning trainee was excluded because he was absent from the skills test. The mean time to learn CPR and AED techniques was 29.0±24.5 minutes in the elearning group. The mean age of the E-learning group was significantly older than that of the control group (32.4±4.0vs. 26.0±1.5, p<0.001). However, we did not find any significant differences in their weight, height or CPR educational status. Before the education sessions, the willingness to perform CPR and their confidence in performing CPR were not significantly different among the two groups. Regarding skill performance, there were no significant differences between the groups except the volume of ventilation. The control group showed a higher volume of ventilation than the elearning group (1,031.7±521.6 vs. 548.8±303.3, p=0.004).
      Conclusion: E-learning accompanied with appropriate practice can be a helpful tool for public CPR training. The demand for E-learning will increase, and this study shows that e-learning programs can be successful, yielding similar results as traditional, classroom-based training.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Barriers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)education are magnified by relative cost and course availability. E-learning has emerged as a viable solution for continuous,on-demand training and organizational learning. We assessed the hypoth...

      Purpose: Barriers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)education are magnified by relative cost and course availability.
      E-learning has emerged as a viable solution for continuous,on-demand training and organizational learning.
      We assessed the hypothesis that E-learning is a viable strategy for CPR training of the general public and sought to evaluate its effects on CPR quality compared to traditional classroom-based methods.
      Methods: The E-learning program was specifically designed to teach basic life support skills, and consisted of 50 minutes internet lectures and simulation videos. The training session was freely available to twenty two officers in rural South Korea. The trainees were able to practice with a mannequin and an automated external defibrillator (AED)trainer at their place of employment over the course of 3days. The control group was trained at a hospital by certified instructors using the same equipment during a 2 hour period.
      At the end of the course, the participant’s skills were evaluated using a checklist and a skill performance test.
      Results: Forty two subjects were enrolled finally with 19 and 23 belonging to the E-learning and the control groups,respectively. One E-learning trainee was excluded because he was absent from the skills test. The mean time to learn CPR and AED techniques was 29.0±24.5 minutes in the elearning group. The mean age of the E-learning group was significantly older than that of the control group (32.4±4.0vs. 26.0±1.5, p<0.001). However, we did not find any significant differences in their weight, height or CPR educational status. Before the education sessions, the willingness to perform CPR and their confidence in performing CPR were not significantly different among the two groups. Regarding skill performance, there were no significant differences between the groups except the volume of ventilation. The control group showed a higher volume of ventilation than the elearning group (1,031.7±521.6 vs. 548.8±303.3, p=0.004).
      Conclusion: E-learning accompanied with appropriate practice can be a helpful tool for public CPR training. The demand for E-learning will increase, and this study shows that e-learning programs can be successful, yielding similar results as traditional, classroom-based training.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이원웅, "일반인 심폐소생술 교육 후 목격자 심폐소생술에 대한 자신감 및 태도변화" 대한응급의학회 20 (20): 505-509, 2009

      2 "http://www.kacpr.org/"

      3 Heidenreich JW, "Uninterrupted chest compression CPR is easier to perform and remember than standard CPR" 63 : 123-130, 2004

      4 Connolly M, "The ‘ABC for life’ programme-teaching basic life support in schools" 72 : 270-279, 2007

      5 Kim KJ, "Medical education in Korea: the e-learning consortium" 31 : e397-e401, 2009

      6 Gormley GJ, "Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students’ experiences and attitudes" 31 : e6-e12, 2009

      7 Nishiyama C, "Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training program with or without preparatory self-learning video: a randomized controlled trial" 80 : 1164-1168, 2009

      8 Sajeva M, "E-learning: Web-based education" 19 : 645-649, 2006

      9 Autti T, "E-learning is a well-accepted tool in supplementary training among medical doctors: an experience of obligatory radiation protection training in healthcare" 48 : 508-513, 2007

      10 Monsieurs KG, "E-learning in resuscitation ; Removing the instructor, the manikin, or both?" 12 : 53-56, 2009

      1 이원웅, "일반인 심폐소생술 교육 후 목격자 심폐소생술에 대한 자신감 및 태도변화" 대한응급의학회 20 (20): 505-509, 2009

      2 "http://www.kacpr.org/"

      3 Heidenreich JW, "Uninterrupted chest compression CPR is easier to perform and remember than standard CPR" 63 : 123-130, 2004

      4 Connolly M, "The ‘ABC for life’ programme-teaching basic life support in schools" 72 : 270-279, 2007

      5 Kim KJ, "Medical education in Korea: the e-learning consortium" 31 : e397-e401, 2009

      6 Gormley GJ, "Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students’ experiences and attitudes" 31 : e6-e12, 2009

      7 Nishiyama C, "Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training program with or without preparatory self-learning video: a randomized controlled trial" 80 : 1164-1168, 2009

      8 Sajeva M, "E-learning: Web-based education" 19 : 645-649, 2006

      9 Autti T, "E-learning is a well-accepted tool in supplementary training among medical doctors: an experience of obligatory radiation protection training in healthcare" 48 : 508-513, 2007

      10 Monsieurs KG, "E-learning in resuscitation ; Removing the instructor, the manikin, or both?" 12 : 53-56, 2009

      11 Levy Y, "Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses" 48 : 185-204, 2007

      12 Wong D, "A Critical Literature Review on e-Learning Limitations" 2 : 55-62, 2007

      13 ECC Committee, "2005 Ameican Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care" 112 : 1-203, 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2020-05-08 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Emergency Medicine -> The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.23 0.23 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.22 0.22 0.339 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼