RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    SCOPUS KCI등재

    성인의 건강증진 생활양식과 자아존중감, 지각된 건강상태와의 비교연구 = Correlational Study of Health Promoting Life Stlyes, Self Esteem and Perceived Health Status of Adulthood

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2033283

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, there has been a growing concern over health promotion in Korea.
    This descriptive correlational study was undertaken in order to compare the health promoting life styles, self esteem, and perceived health status of older adults with those of young and middle-aged adults, to examine the relationship of self esteem, perceived health status, and sociodemographic characteristics to health promoting life styles through out adulthood, and to identify predicters of health promoting life styles.
    The instrument of this study was a structured questionnaire included Health Promoting Life Style, Self Esteem, Perceived Health Status, Sociodemographic Characteristics.
    Six dimensions of life style such as self-actualization, reponsibility for health, nutrition, exercise, interpersonal relationship, and stress control were measured by the Health- Promoting Lifestyle Profile(HPLP) in 553 adults aged 18 to 89.
    Data were collected from November 1995 to January 1996.
    Analysis of the data was done by use of descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Pearson Correlation Coefficient and stepwise multiple regression.
    The results of this study are as follows :
    1. The health promoting life styles activities were showed statistically significant difference among the three groups. Young adults had high scores in overall health promoting life style than middle-aged and older adults. In self actualization dimension, young adults had high scores(2,914) than middle aged and older adults. In responsibility for health, exercise, interpersonnal relationship, and stress management dimensions. middle aged adults had high scores than young and older adults. In nutrition dimension, older adults had high scores than young and middle aged adults.
    2. The self esteem and perceived health status were showed statistically significant difference among the three groups. Middle-aged adults had high scores in self esteem and young adults perceived good health status.
    3. With regard to the relationship between health promoting life styles and all variables, self esteem and educational status correlated positively with health promoting life styles in all the three groups.
    4. The combination of age, self esteem, educational status, sex, family income explained 24.1% of the variance of the likelihood of engagement in health promoting life styles inadulthood, specially self esteem and age were the predicter of health promoting life styles in the three groups.
    번역하기

    Recently, there has been a growing concern over health promotion in Korea. This descriptive correlational study was undertaken in order to compare the health promoting life styles, self esteem, and perceived health status of older adults with those ...

    Recently, there has been a growing concern over health promotion in Korea.
    This descriptive correlational study was undertaken in order to compare the health promoting life styles, self esteem, and perceived health status of older adults with those of young and middle-aged adults, to examine the relationship of self esteem, perceived health status, and sociodemographic characteristics to health promoting life styles through out adulthood, and to identify predicters of health promoting life styles.
    The instrument of this study was a structured questionnaire included Health Promoting Life Style, Self Esteem, Perceived Health Status, Sociodemographic Characteristics.
    Six dimensions of life style such as self-actualization, reponsibility for health, nutrition, exercise, interpersonal relationship, and stress control were measured by the Health- Promoting Lifestyle Profile(HPLP) in 553 adults aged 18 to 89.
    Data were collected from November 1995 to January 1996.
    Analysis of the data was done by use of descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Pearson Correlation Coefficient and stepwise multiple regression.
    The results of this study are as follows :
    1. The health promoting life styles activities were showed statistically significant difference among the three groups. Young adults had high scores in overall health promoting life style than middle-aged and older adults. In self actualization dimension, young adults had high scores(2,914) than middle aged and older adults. In responsibility for health, exercise, interpersonnal relationship, and stress management dimensions. middle aged adults had high scores than young and older adults. In nutrition dimension, older adults had high scores than young and middle aged adults.
    2. The self esteem and perceived health status were showed statistically significant difference among the three groups. Middle-aged adults had high scores in self esteem and young adults perceived good health status.
    3. With regard to the relationship between health promoting life styles and all variables, self esteem and educational status correlated positively with health promoting life styles in all the three groups.
    4. The combination of age, self esteem, educational status, sex, family income explained 24.1% of the variance of the likelihood of engagement in health promoting life styles inadulthood, specially self esteem and age were the predicter of health promoting life styles in the three groups.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼