RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국교회와 구원론: “새 관점”에 대한 복음주의의 대응 -로마서와 갈라디아서에 나타난 바울의 “이신칭의”(the Justification by Faith)교훈을 중심으로- = Korean Church and Soteriology: An Evangelical Response to the New Perspective -With Special Reference to Paul`s Teachings of “Justification by Faith” in Romans and Galatians-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82420410

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This is an evangelical response to the reinterpretation of the New Perspective on Paul(NPP) about the Pauline teaching of the justification of faith. Recently E.P. Sanders, James D,G. Dunn, and N.T. Wright, the most outstanding advocates of the NPP, have challenged the traditional understanding of Paul`s teaching on `justification by faith`, by arguing firstly, it(`justification by faith`) is a Gentile mission product rather than the core teaching of Paul`s gospel; secondly, it is an social-ecclesiological doctrine rather than an soteriological; thirdly, it makes away with the imputation; and fourthly, it is related with the present verdict rather than the future verdict which will be given in accordance with the whole life of the believer. Throughout an exegetical research on Paul`s teachings on `justification by faith` in Romans and Galatians, this paper defends the traditionalunderstanding of `justification by faith`, by arguing firstly, it is a core part of Paul`s gospel, secondly, it is soteriological as well as ecclesiological, thirdly, it goes on with the imputation, and fourthly it is related with both the present and the future verdict. Therefore, this paper concludes that the reinterpretation of the NPP about the Pauline teaching of `justification by faith has no biblical foundation, although the NPP has provided some new insights on the role of the covenant and the law within Second Temple Judaism, as well as on the horizontal meaning of the righteousness in the Pauline letters.
    번역하기

    This is an evangelical response to the reinterpretation of the New Perspective on Paul(NPP) about the Pauline teaching of the justification of faith. Recently E.P. Sanders, James D,G. Dunn, and N.T. Wright, the most outstanding advocates of the NPP, h...

    This is an evangelical response to the reinterpretation of the New Perspective on Paul(NPP) about the Pauline teaching of the justification of faith. Recently E.P. Sanders, James D,G. Dunn, and N.T. Wright, the most outstanding advocates of the NPP, have challenged the traditional understanding of Paul`s teaching on `justification by faith`, by arguing firstly, it(`justification by faith`) is a Gentile mission product rather than the core teaching of Paul`s gospel; secondly, it is an social-ecclesiological doctrine rather than an soteriological; thirdly, it makes away with the imputation; and fourthly, it is related with the present verdict rather than the future verdict which will be given in accordance with the whole life of the believer. Throughout an exegetical research on Paul`s teachings on `justification by faith` in Romans and Galatians, this paper defends the traditionalunderstanding of `justification by faith`, by arguing firstly, it is a core part of Paul`s gospel, secondly, it is soteriological as well as ecclesiological, thirdly, it goes on with the imputation, and fourthly it is related with both the present and the future verdict. Therefore, this paper concludes that the reinterpretation of the NPP about the Pauline teaching of `justification by faith has no biblical foundation, although the NPP has provided some new insights on the role of the covenant and the law within Second Temple Judaism, as well as on the horizontal meaning of the righteousness in the Pauline letters.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Piper,John, "칭의 교리를 사수하라" 부흥과 개혁사 2007

    2 최갑종, "로마서 듣기 온 세상을 향한 기독교복음의 진수" 대서 2009

    3 최갑종, "‘새 관점의 바울 연구’ 다시 보기" 한국복음주의신약학회 8 (8): 93-124, 2009

    4 De Roo,J.C.R, "‘Works of the Law’ at Qumran and in Paul in NTM" Phoenix 2007

    5 최갑종, "ΠΙΣΤΙΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ, 어떻게 해석할 것인가?: 로마서 3:21-31에 나타나는 ΠΙΣΤΙΣ와 ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥΣΝΕ을 중심으로" 한국복음주의신학회 52 : 65-107, 2009

    6 Gathercole,Simon J, "Where is Boasting? Early Jewish Soteriology and Paul’s Response in Romans 1-5" Eerdmans 2002

    7 Wright,N.T, "What Saint Paul Really Said" Eerdmans 1997

    8 Avemarie,F, "Tora und Leben:Untersuchungen zur Heilsbedeutung der Tora in der frühen rabbinischen Literatur in TSAT" Mohr 1996

    9 Eskola,T.Theodicy and Predestination in Pauline Soteriology.WUNT 2, "Theodicy and Predestination in Pauline Soteriology in WUNT" Mohr 100-, 1998

    10 Dunn,James D.G., "The Theology of Paul the Apostle" Eerdmans 1998

    1 Piper,John, "칭의 교리를 사수하라" 부흥과 개혁사 2007

    2 최갑종, "로마서 듣기 온 세상을 향한 기독교복음의 진수" 대서 2009

    3 최갑종, "‘새 관점의 바울 연구’ 다시 보기" 한국복음주의신약학회 8 (8): 93-124, 2009

    4 De Roo,J.C.R, "‘Works of the Law’ at Qumran and in Paul in NTM" Phoenix 2007

    5 최갑종, "ΠΙΣΤΙΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ, 어떻게 해석할 것인가?: 로마서 3:21-31에 나타나는 ΠΙΣΤΙΣ와 ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥΣΝΕ을 중심으로" 한국복음주의신학회 52 : 65-107, 2009

    6 Gathercole,Simon J, "Where is Boasting? Early Jewish Soteriology and Paul’s Response in Romans 1-5" Eerdmans 2002

    7 Wright,N.T, "What Saint Paul Really Said" Eerdmans 1997

    8 Avemarie,F, "Tora und Leben:Untersuchungen zur Heilsbedeutung der Tora in der frühen rabbinischen Literatur in TSAT" Mohr 1996

    9 Eskola,T.Theodicy and Predestination in Pauline Soteriology.WUNT 2, "Theodicy and Predestination in Pauline Soteriology in WUNT" Mohr 100-, 1998

    10 Dunn,James D.G., "The Theology of Paul the Apostle" Eerdmans 1998

    11 Bird,F, "The Saving Righteousness of God:Studies on Paul,Justification,and the New Perspective" Paternoster 2007

    12 Dunn,James D.G., "The New Perspective on Paul" Eerdmans 2008

    13 Piper,John, "The Future of Justification. A Response to N. T. Wright" Crossway Books 2007

    14 Tobin,Thomas H, "Rhetoric in Its Context:The Argument of Romans" Hendrickson 2004

    15 Stuhlmacher,P, "Revisiting Paul’s Doctrine of Justification:A Challenge to the New Perspective" InterVarsity 2001

    16 Westerholm,S, "Perspectives Old and New on Paul" Eerdmans 2004

    17 Schreiner,T.R., "Paul. Apostle of God’s Glory in Christ. A Pauline Theology" InterVarsity 2001

    18 Das,A.A, "Paul,the Law and the Covenant" Hendrickson 2001

    19 Sanders,E.P, "Paul, the Law, and the Jewish People" Fortress 1983

    20 Talbert, C. H, "Paul, Judaism, and the Revisionist" 63 : 1-22, 2001

    21 Kim,Seyoon, "Paul and the New Perspective:Second Thoughts on the Origin of Paul’s Gospel" Eerdmans 2002

    22 Sanders,E.P, "Paul and Palestinian Judaism. A Comparison of Pattern of Religion" Fortress Press 1977

    23 Laato,T, "Paul and Judaism:An Anthropological Approach" Scholars Press 1995

    24 Ortlund, Daniel C., "Justified by Faith, Judged according to Works: Another Look at a Pauline Paradox" 52 (52): 323-39, 2009

    25 Husbands,Mark, "Justification:What’s at Stake in the Current Debates" InterVarsity Press 2004

    26 Wright,N.T, "Justification. God’s Plan & Paul’s Vision" IVP Academic 2009

    27 Carson, D. A., "Justification and Variegated Nomism. Vol. 1: The Complexities of Second Temple Judaism" Baker Academic 2001

    28 Carson, D. A., "Justification and Variegated Nomism Vol. 2: The Paradoxes of Paul" Baker Academic 2004

    29 Fesko,J.V., "Justification Understanding the Classic Reformed Doctrine" P & R. Pub. 2008

    30 VanLandingham,Chris, "Judgment & Justification in Early Judaism and the Apostle Paul" Hendrickson 2006

    31 Neusner, J, "Judaic Law from Jesus to the Mishnah: A Systematic Reply to Professor E. P. Sanders" Scholars 1993

    32 Calvin,John., "Institutes of the Christian Religion in Ford Lewis Battles" Westminster 1960

    33 Seifrid,M.A, "Christ,Our Righteousness:Paul’s Theology of Justification" Inter Varsity Press 2000

    34 Wright,N.T, "4QMMT and Paul: Justification, ‘Works’ and Eschatology in History and Exegesis: New Testament Essays in Honor of Dr. E. Earle Ellis for His 80th Birthday" T & T Clark 104-132, 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.75 0.75 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.49 0.63 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼