RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Two Attempts to Medicalize Reproduction and Their Implications

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105276442

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article contrasts the Korean government s two interventions, separated by 50 years, in birth control policy and support for assisted reproductive technology. One of the two interventions achieved the goal of a sharp decline in birth rate, but the other did not achieve the goal of raising the birth rate. Thus the results of the two interventions varied greatly. It is the goal of this paper to identify the reasons for this difference. Incomparing the two cases, we examine several factors: phenomena, trends, individual differences, and their considerations and moral psychology. The fact that individuals engage in moral deliberation when deciding on reproductive behaviour can be considered a key reason why the two interventions produced different results. If this hypothesis is correct, policy intervention may not lead to the desired result unless the elements of moral deliberation are considered.
      번역하기

      This article contrasts the Korean government s two interventions, separated by 50 years, in birth control policy and support for assisted reproductive technology. One of the two interventions achieved the goal of a sharp decline in birth rate, but the...

      This article contrasts the Korean government s two interventions, separated by 50 years, in birth control policy and support for assisted reproductive technology. One of the two interventions achieved the goal of a sharp decline in birth rate, but the other did not achieve the goal of raising the birth rate. Thus the results of the two interventions varied greatly. It is the goal of this paper to identify the reasons for this difference. Incomparing the two cases, we examine several factors: phenomena, trends, individual differences, and their considerations and moral psychology. The fact that individuals engage in moral deliberation when deciding on reproductive behaviour can be considered a key reason why the two interventions produced different results. If this hypothesis is correct, policy intervention may not lead to the desired result unless the elements of moral deliberation are considered.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Case 1: National Supporting Program for Infertile Couples
      • Ⅲ. Case 2: Family Planning Program
      • Ⅳ. Possible factors that may influence the success of medicalization
      • Ⅴ. Conclusion
      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Case 1: National Supporting Program for Infertile Couples
      • Ⅲ. Case 2: Family Planning Program
      • Ⅳ. Possible factors that may influence the success of medicalization
      • Ⅴ. Conclusion
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼