RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    ARIA분류에 따른 알레르기 비염의 유병률 = Prevalence of Allergic Rhinitis on the Basis of ARIA Classification

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101610595

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background and Objectives:Allergic rhinitis (AR) is commonly sub-classified into seasonal and perennial rhinitis. The recent “Allergic Rhinitis and its impact on Asthma (ARIA) Workshop” proposed to replace these terms by intermittent vs persistent AR. But the validity of this new classification is still largely unknown. Subjects and Method:Three hundred-eleven allergic rhinitis patients were included in this study. Patients were categorized into seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) groups, according to sensitized allergens. Twenty-eight items questionnaire filled out by patients were designed for this study. Based on the questionnaire, patients were classified into either intermittent or persistent AR. Patients information and associated factors were analysed between the groups. Results:Within the population with AR, 58% of the subjects had persistent AR. About 41% of the patients were classified as moderate-severe persistent AR. There was no association between the intermittent/persistent and the SAR/PAR classifications. Subjects with persistent AR had more severe symptoms, higher rate of self-awareness and had been previously diagnosed with AR. There were no significant difference in sensitization to allergens. However, grass, tree, house dust mite allergy is more common in persistent AR than in intermittent AR. More patients in Blockers and Mixed groups had persistent AR. Conclusion:A statistical comparison of the two classifications showed that they cannot be used interchangeably, as they do not represent the same stratum of disease. There is also an evidencethat the persistent type describes a distinct group with characteristics that differentiates them from intermittent AR. These results support the validity of the new ARIA classification as shown in other studies. (Korean J Otolaryngol 2006;49:623-8)
    번역하기

    Background and Objectives:Allergic rhinitis (AR) is commonly sub-classified into seasonal and perennial rhinitis. The recent “Allergic Rhinitis and its impact on Asthma (ARIA) Workshop” proposed to replace these terms by intermittent vs persiste...

    Background and Objectives:Allergic rhinitis (AR) is commonly sub-classified into seasonal and perennial rhinitis. The recent “Allergic Rhinitis and its impact on Asthma (ARIA) Workshop” proposed to replace these terms by intermittent vs persistent AR. But the validity of this new classification is still largely unknown. Subjects and Method:Three hundred-eleven allergic rhinitis patients were included in this study. Patients were categorized into seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) groups, according to sensitized allergens. Twenty-eight items questionnaire filled out by patients were designed for this study. Based on the questionnaire, patients were classified into either intermittent or persistent AR. Patients information and associated factors were analysed between the groups. Results:Within the population with AR, 58% of the subjects had persistent AR. About 41% of the patients were classified as moderate-severe persistent AR. There was no association between the intermittent/persistent and the SAR/PAR classifications. Subjects with persistent AR had more severe symptoms, higher rate of self-awareness and had been previously diagnosed with AR. There were no significant difference in sensitization to allergens. However, grass, tree, house dust mite allergy is more common in persistent AR than in intermittent AR. More patients in Blockers and Mixed groups had persistent AR. Conclusion:A statistical comparison of the two classifications showed that they cannot be used interchangeably, as they do not represent the same stratum of disease. There is also an evidencethat the persistent type describes a distinct group with characteristics that differentiates them from intermittent AR. These results support the validity of the new ARIA classification as shown in other studies. (Korean J Otolaryngol 2006;49:623-8)

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "the new ARIAclassification and global approaches to treatment" 4 : 1-4, 2004

    2 "of theclassification of ARIA (allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma)" 58 : 672-675, 2003

    3 "The cost ofproductivity losses associated with allergic rhinitis" 6 : 373-378, 2000

    4 "Internationalconsensus report on diagnosis and management of rhinitis" 49 : 1-34, 1994

    5 "Executive summary of joint task forcepractice parameters on diagnosis and management of rhinitis" 81 : 463-468, 1998

    6 "Epidemiology of seasonal and perennial rhinitis:Clinical presentation and medical history" 46 : 895-901, 1991

    7 "Epidemiological characterization of the intermittentand persistent types of allergic rhinitis" 60 : 350-353, 2005

    8 "Comparative degree and type pf sensitization to common indoorand outdoor allergens in subjects with allergic rhinitis and /or asthma" 27 : 52-59, 1997

    9 "Clinical statisticalstudy on offending allergens of patients with allergic rhinitis:Prevalence of multiple sensitization" 46 : 48-53, 2003

    10 "Characteristics of intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis:DREAMS study group" 35 : 728-732, 2005

    1 "the new ARIAclassification and global approaches to treatment" 4 : 1-4, 2004

    2 "of theclassification of ARIA (allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma)" 58 : 672-675, 2003

    3 "The cost ofproductivity losses associated with allergic rhinitis" 6 : 373-378, 2000

    4 "Internationalconsensus report on diagnosis and management of rhinitis" 49 : 1-34, 1994

    5 "Executive summary of joint task forcepractice parameters on diagnosis and management of rhinitis" 81 : 463-468, 1998

    6 "Epidemiology of seasonal and perennial rhinitis:Clinical presentation and medical history" 46 : 895-901, 1991

    7 "Epidemiological characterization of the intermittentand persistent types of allergic rhinitis" 60 : 350-353, 2005

    8 "Comparative degree and type pf sensitization to common indoorand outdoor allergens in subjects with allergic rhinitis and /or asthma" 27 : 52-59, 1997

    9 "Clinical statisticalstudy on offending allergens of patients with allergic rhinitis:Prevalence of multiple sensitization" 46 : 48-53, 2003

    10 "Characteristics of intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis:DREAMS study group" 35 : 728-732, 2005

    11 "Catrgorization of patients with allergic rhinitis: Acomparative profile of "sneezers and runners" and "blockers"" 94 : 60-64, 2005

    12 "Allergic rhinitis:A neglected diseased" 14 : 1-6, 2000

    13 "Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma" 108 : 147-334, 2001

    14 "A three-year aerobiologic pollen survey of theTampa Bay area" 534-40,

    15 "A clinical statistics ofallergic rhinitis in Honam area" 32 : 1067-73, 1989

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼